KnowBe4 vs SecurityIQ comparison

KnowBe4 and InfoSec Institute are both solutions in the Security Awareness Training category. KnowBe4 is ranked #1 with an average rating of 9.5, while InfoSec Institute is ranked #5 with an average rating of 9.0. KnowBe4 holds a 29.2% mindshare in SAT, compared to InfoSec Institute’s 0.9% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of KnowBe4 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of InfoSec Institute users who would recommend it.

KnowBe4

Read 5 KnowBe4 reviews

1,655 Views
1,243 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SecurityIQ

Read 1 SecurityIQ review

80 Views
39 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

KnowBe4

SecurityIQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between KnowBe4 and SecurityIQ based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about KnowBe4, Proofpoint, Sophos and others in Security Awareness Training.

To learn more, read our detailed Security Awareness Training Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

KnowBe4

Ranking in Security Awareness Training

1st

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

8.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SecurityIQ

Ranking in Security Awareness Training

5th

Average Rating

9.0

Reviews Sentiment

5.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Security Awareness Training category, the mindshare of KnowBe4 is 29.2%, down from 35.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SecurityIQ is 0.9%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Security Awareness Training

Featured Reviews

Brad Mathis

Employee-Owner, Senior Consultant, Information Security at Keller Schroeder

Lowers human element risks and has innovative training

Some more AI-driven automation for creating training and phishing testing campaigns, as well as automated reporting would help. The Phish Alert button could be improved, although it is understood this is due to Microsoft's constant changes. Any improvements in wizards and documentation are always a good thing!. Additonal areas for improvement could be around the technical training and best practice training areas such as NIST CSF, CISv8, Cyberinsurance, and more. Clearer whitelisting requirements are always appreciated. However, the current levels are significant and appreciated.

Read full review

Vagner Nunes

Account Manager at IBLISS Digital Security

An Automatic Solution for providing Tailored Training To Employees

I was responsible for training for a partnership with Infra Infra company and for that I used SecurityIQ. They have a a a knowledge base and a program. They have a very robust training system for the new for different levels of of professionals. That is their most valuable feature. The…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"KnowBe4's formulas for risk reduction simply work. Being a technical company, our initial phish-prone percentage wasn't super high, but it was still around 18%. Since we have been requiring ongoing training and simulated phish testing, our average phish-prone percentage hovers in the 0 to 3% range now."

"The solution is very well priced and very affordable."

"The main thing is the overall report card. We get to tell the percentages of users who click on links and who don't click on links. We also get an overall score or risk score from them, which also helps us."

"There are many valuable features. It's already deployed in the cloud, and you don't have to install anything. You just upload your users to the cloud and tweak something if needed. You can whitelist some servers to work with this properly. When everything is ready, you can start using the platform and its many automated features."

"Their customizable nature allows us to create scenarios that closely resemble real-world phishing attempts, making them highly relatable to our end users."

"The ability to have business leadership be aware of their users' security posture as well as any kind of security awareness training being pushed by cybersecurity insurance and underwriters is valuable."

"They have a a a knowledge base and a program. They have a very robust training system for the new for different levels of of professionals. That is their most valuable feature."

Cons

"Enhancing the product's emotional intelligence, particularly by providing training content tailored to specific audiences, is an area for improvement."

"I would like to see Novo4 expand to other channels outside of emails to things such as text messages."

"It could be more localized for Ukrainian users. This platform is international, and it has a lot of material in different languages, but not in Ukrainian and Russian languages. There's plenty of different content updated regularly for English, French, and German users. They have a lot more information, and Ukrainian users also want more."

"It can be more interactive with users. We want to put the users in different scenarios and let them make decisions. For example, instead of making users go through a video and then asking questions, it can have a video where they click on the scenarios and have to make decisions. It can maybe have something like a live simulation. It would be nice for users."

"The training should be improved in regards to the needs of the customers. It has to be understood what kind of training should be provided and also provide assessments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I don't know the cost, but I believe we are paying yearly. We did like a three-year or five-year contract. I am not aware of any extra costs in addition to a standard licensing fee."

"It's about five dollars a seat per month."

"I rate the product pricing as four out of ten."

"Licensing is paid on a yearly basis. You can go to the official site to check their approximate pricing. It's based on the number of users or staff. It can vary from country to country, but for Ukraine, it works as it's stated on the site."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Security Awareness Training solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

Healthcare Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about KnowBe4?

Their customizable nature allows us to create scenarios that closely resemble real-world phishing attempts, making them highly relatable to our end users.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for KnowBe4?

The solution is very well priced and very affordable. It's about five dollars a seat per month.

See all answers

What needs improvement with KnowBe4?

I would like to see Novo4 expand to other channels outside of emails to things such as text messages.

See all answers

What do you like most about SecurityIQ?

They have a a a knowledge base and a program. They have a very robust training system for the new for different levels of of professionals. That is their most valuable feature.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SecurityIQ?

The training should be improved in regards to the needs of the customers. It has to be understood what kind of training should be provided and also provide assessments.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SecurityIQ?

I was responsible for training for a partnership with Infra Infra company and for that I used SecurityIQ.

See all answers

Comparisons

Terranova Security vs KnowBe4

Compared 16% of the time

Arctic Wolf Managed Security Awareness vs KnowBe4

Compared 15% of the time

Proofpoint Email Protection vs KnowBe4

Compared 13% of the time

Kaspersky Security Awareness vs KnowBe4

Compared 9% of the time

Sophos Phish Threat vs KnowBe4

Compared 8% of the time

More KnowBe4 Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

KnowBe4

February 2025

Download KnowBe4 product report

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

February 2025

Download SecurityIQ product report

Overview

Old school Security Awareness Training is static. It’s a one-time event without follow-up. KnowBe4's Kevin Mitnick Security Awareness Training starts with a baseline test to show the actual Phish-prone percentage of your users. Then it steps users through effective, interactive, on-demand browser-based training. As step three, you send frequent simulated phishing attacks to your employees to reinforce the training. This last feature, frequent simulated phishing attacks (we recommend at the very least once a month) really creates a change in behavior.

KnowBe4

SecurityIQ identifies your security-naive employees and delivers training targeted to their roles. It self-evolves with employees’ security aptitudes and learning styles, creating personalized learning experiences that motivate behavioral change.

InfoSec Institute

Sample Customers

West Aurora Public School District 129

Technical Financial Solutions, Arkansas Securities Department, America’s Car-Mart

Buyer's Guide

Security Awareness Training

February 2025

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about KnowBe4, Proofpoint, Sophos and others in Security Awareness Training. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Security Awareness Training vendors.

We monitor all Security Awareness Training reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.