Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Kodjin FHIR Server vs NetApp ONTAP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Kodjin FHIR Server
Ranking in Storage Software
5th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
NetApp ONTAP
Ranking in Storage Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
73
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Storage Software category, the mindshare of Kodjin FHIR Server is 10.3%, up from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetApp ONTAP is 45.7%, up from 43.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Storage Software
 

Featured Reviews

Use Kodjin FHIR Server?
Share your opinion
Dan Pride - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 3, 2023
Excellent support, highly stable, and easy to use
We manage all of our storage with it. In terms of the version, we're in the process of going to the newest version. It's probably 9.12 Resiliency is the big one for us. Its ease of use, for the most part, through the interfaces is valuable. It's very expensive. I have been using this solution…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"ONTAP has helped us reduce the cost of storage by a lot. We were using IBM XIVs and were paying high costs, except for the maintenance. Now, we are on all-flash and we pay less than what we used to pay."
"This solution helped our organization reduce our overall cost of storage. Because idle data which was residing on high cost tiers, once we sifted the ONTAP, we were able to scale and place it where it should be, then offload the data which was unnecessary to different locations."
"We save a lot because of the deduplication and compression."
"We have seen ROI as we can fit a lot more storage in one rack."
"There are specific workloads where some vendors provide better value, but in general, NetApp has done a far better on price than other vendors."
"The solution has helped us reduce the overall cost of storage by doing an OPEX agreement with NetApp, we are paying based on utilization. Instead of fronting 30 petabytes worth of storage, we are paying for what we're using."
"The data compression and deduplication have kept us from buying more disks these past three years."
"We received a super deal for our new machine, so we were happy with the price."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Storage Software solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Manufacturing Company
18%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
6%
Retailer
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...
What do you like most about NetApp ONTAP?
We do not face any glitches or downtime.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetApp ONTAP?
The product is a bit expensive. I rate the pricing a five out of ten.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1&1 IONOS, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Adder Technologies, Aero Vodochody Aerospace
Find out what your peers are saying about DataCore, NetApp, Dell Technologies and others in Storage Software. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.