Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Azure NetApp Files vs NetApp ONTAP comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure NetApp Files boosts performance, eases deployment, reduces downtime, and optimizes costs, despite higher initial expenses than on-premises.
Sentiment score
7.6
NetApp ONTAP enhances cost efficiency by optimizing storage through compression and deduplication, improving performance and reducing hardware expenses.
In the long run, we can see a 10% to 20% return on investment.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
This needs to be evaluated by the business, especially considering that NetApp phases out technology after some years and introduces newer technology.
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.4
Azure NetApp Files receives mixed feedback on support, praised for integration and ease, but some users seek more specialized assistance.
Sentiment score
5.9
NetApp ONTAP support is knowledgeable and quick, but initial responses vary, necessitating escalation for effective resolutions.
They have top-notch people.
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
This includes disk replacement, firmware upgrades, and NetApp ONTAP upgrades, which we handle locally in Nigeria.
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
The support is top-notch.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Azure NetApp Files is scalable, flexible, and cost-effective for large setups, but pricing concerns exist for smaller setups.
Sentiment score
7.6
NetApp ONTAP offers flexible scalability, supporting seamless expansion and integration, enhancing capacity for organizations worldwide, despite minor high-scale limitations.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.4
Azure NetApp Files is rated highly for stability due to its reliability and consistency under increased workloads and migrations.
Sentiment score
8.1
NetApp ONTAP is praised for high stability, effective bug mitigation, strong support, and reliable performance, enhancing user confidence.
Both stability and scalability are a 10 out of 10.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
If we have a fail-disk, it provides HA, and due to the failover capability, we have not experienced issues recently.
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
 

Room For Improvement

Azure NetApp Files needs improved features, cost efficiency, easier deployment, regional integration, and strengthened security to meet user demands.
NetApp ONTAP needs better cloud integration, security, APIs, deduplication, interfaces, performance, power support, and cost efficiency improvements.
I would like for them to have more compression so that it can avoid using more storage.
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
The support response needs improvement, especially for P1 cases. When critical cases are raised, they should ensure they call the customer and follow up properly.
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
The interface is very intuitive, and the solution is robust.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Setup Cost

Azure NetApp Files pricing is premium yet justified by features like management, scalability, and flexible licensing options.
NetApp ONTAP's high price offers significant value with feature-rich capabilities and cost-efficiency, benefiting larger organizations despite complex licensing.
It is expensive, especially with NetApp Ultra Storage.
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
It is cost-effective for the benefits you get.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Valuable Features

Azure NetApp Files enhances performance, scalability, and management with integrated features for backup, recovery, and seamless Azure integration.
NetApp ONTAP offers high availability, data replication, deduplication, ease of use, and integrates well for efficient data management.
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes.
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
NetApp ONTAP has improved our organization through speed, efficiency, and data availability, which ensures business continuity.
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
It lets you know if you have issues early enough so that you can plan around resolving and mitigating future issues.
Systems and Network Administrator at a university with 1,001-5,000 employees
 

Categories and Ranking

Azure NetApp Files
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
17
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Migration (7th), Cloud Storage (12th), Public Cloud Storage Services (11th)
NetApp ONTAP
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
92
Ranking in other categories
Storage Software (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

Azure NetApp Files and NetApp ONTAP aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. Azure NetApp Files is designed for Cloud Migration and holds a mindshare of 7.4%, down 14.5% compared to last year.
NetApp ONTAP, on the other hand, focuses on Storage Software, holds 27.8% mindshare, down 44.1% since last year.
Cloud Migration Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Azure NetApp Files7.4%
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP7.4%
Nasuni6.3%
Other78.9%
Cloud Migration
Storage Software Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
NetApp ONTAP27.8%
DataCore SANsymphony23.9%
Dell PowerPath15.4%
Other32.89999999999999%
Storage Software
 

Q&A Highlights

NC
Content Manager at PeerSpot
Nov 01, 2021
 

Featured Reviews

AjayKumar13 - PeerSpot reviewer
Cloud/Data/Database Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees
Fast, reliable, and helps meet our SLAs
The most valuable feature is that the sixty-terabyte database snapshot can be done in less than two to three minutes. It is faster. It is quicker. It is reliable. You don't need to take the snapshot. Snapshots are compressed. It doesn't take storage from the back end. It takes three minutes to do sixty terabytes of the database. You don't have to go to the tape and store it outside, which takes hours and hours. It also uses a lot less of the storage. It's very easy to restore or copy the snapshots to other locations for disaster recovery. There are a lot of benefits. In terms of the snapshot's rapid restore capability, we were testing the load of performance testing, and we needed to rebuild the DR site. If I need to rebuild the DR for a standby database, it takes sixty terabytes to copy onto the another site, which will take at least a day. Now, the snapshot is easy. We just copy the snapshots, and then we do the cross-region application. The snapshots came along with that, and that's where we were able to build the DR site within a few hours rather than days. All together, instead of a four-day process, instead of a day.
BK
Senior Storage Engineer at Shell
Data management and availability improve operations, but cost and support need attention
For snapshots, there should be something similar to a recycle bin. When someone mistakenly deletes a snapshot, it should be stored for about two days before disappearing from the system. Regarding storage optimization, when purchasing a 10 terabyte disk, after formatting, you can only use approximately 8 terabytes. They should improve this so users can utilize 90% instead of 80% of the disk space. The support response needs improvement, especially for P1 cases. When critical cases are raised, they should ensure they call the customer and follow up properly. Comparing NetApp ONTAP to other solutions such as EMC, the cost of contract renewals and warranties is relatively expensive. They should extend their renewal window beyond the current six months to one year options. A longer warranty period of two years for new systems, controllers, or filers would be beneficial. Overall, they should reduce subscription costs for businesses.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Migration solutions are best for your needs.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Educational Organization
6%
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
9%
University
7%
Transportation Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business4
Midsize Enterprise2
Large Enterprise13
By reviewers
Company SizeCount
Small Business11
Midsize Enterprise13
Large Enterprise66
 

Questions from the Community

How does Azure NetApp Files compare to NetApp ONTAP?
Azure NetApp Files is a Microsoft Azure file storage service built on NetApp technology. The platform combines the file capabilities of Azure and NetApp to move critical file-based applications to ...
What do you like most about Azure NetApp Files?
The availability is good, meaning downtime or network issues rarely occur. The system also offers flexibility, allowing for increases in data volume, IOPS, and other capabilities without requiring ...
What do you like most about NetApp ONTAP?
We do not face any glitches or downtime.
What needs improvement with NetApp ONTAP?
For me, it is an ideal solution. There isn't any area that needs urgent improvements because the interface is very intuitive, and the solution is robust. However, if the integration with legacy app...
 

Also Known As

NetApp ANF, ANF
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

SAP, Restaurant Magic
1&1 IONOS, Acıbadem Healthcare Group, Adder Technologies, Aero Vodochody Aerospace
Find out what your peers are saying about Hewlett Packard Enterprise, NetApp, Nasuni and others in Cloud Migration. Updated: December 2025.
879,425 professionals have used our research since 2012.