LambdaTest vs Qualibrate comparison

LambdaTest and Qualibrate are both solutions in the Functional Testing Tools category. LambdaTest is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.7, while Qualibrate is ranked #38. LambdaTest holds a 5.1% mindshare in FT, compared to Qualibrate’s 0.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of LambdaTest users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Qualibrate users who would recommend it.

LambdaTest

Read 26 LambdaTest reviews

3,439 Views
2,402 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

Qualibrate

Read 5 Qualibrate reviews

151 Views
49 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LambdaTest

Qualibrate

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

LambdaTest and Qualibrate are competing products in the software testing domain. LambdaTest has the upper hand with competitive pricing and solid support, while Qualibrate is recognized for its comprehensive features, which justify its cost.

Features: LambdaTest offers automated testing across browsers and operating systems, integrates with popular CI/CD tools, and provides geolocation testing capabilities. Qualibrate delivers a full suite for testing, documentation, and training with automated script recording, process modeling, and the ability to manage end-to-end testing processes, providing a holistic solution.

Room for Improvement: LambdaTest could enhance feature comprehensiveness, increase support for more complex workflow integrations, and expand its automation capabilities. Qualibrate would benefit from a simpler interface, reduced deployment complexity, and a more competitive pricing structure for smaller teams.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: LambdaTest offers easy deployment with robust online documentation and 24/7 support. Qualibrate presents a more complex deployment due to its extensive features but offers comprehensive onboarding and personalized customer support for seamless integration into existing workflows.

Pricing and ROI: LambdaTest provides a lower entry cost with flexible pricing tiers, allowing for faster ROI for straightforward testing needs. Qualibrate involves a higher initial investment but rewards customers with efficiency and quality improvements over time.

To learn more, read our detailed LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LambdaTest

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

7th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

8th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Qualibrate

Ranking in Functional Testing Tools

38th

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

39th

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Regression Testing Tools (22nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of LambdaTest is 5.1%, up from 5.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Qualibrate is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Functional Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Andrew Rorat

Automation Engineer at SoftServe Ltd.

Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation

We had a regression run every two weeks. During every regression testing, we had similar issues from LambdaTest's side, which was a huge problem for our tests, stability, and productivity. I had to call them every two weeks and spend two to four hours on one call to understand why this happened. The LambdaTest engineer we communicated with decided that he didn't need to fix this issue. So, I had to create a workaround from my side. This was the biggest issue I faced with the solution.

Read full review

Reviewer148493

Test Manager at a government with 10,001+ employees

Reduces our testing time significantly, enabling us to release more frequently

The most valuable feature is the way it works, the usability. From the first setup, the user interface is the most beautiful. It's very nice the way you can recover things and make it work. We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate. Because everything we do is in SAP Solution Manager, we are now able to do test automatization, combined with Qualibrate. All the defects are available in SAP Solution Manager and all the changes will be in Qualibrate, immediately. From Qualibrate, we see whether tests are good or not. We can create a test-related incident in Solution Manager for those that are not good, and Test Suite in Solution Manager will notify the person who has to rebuild it. That works very nicely.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It is a scalable solution."

"Builds that took days to complete with in-house infrastructure were executed in a couple of hours."

"The most valuable features are that it's essentially on-demand, and you only focus on getting the code that needs to be executed without having to worry about the OS, hardware, etc."

"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."

"LambdaTest supports multiple platforms like iOS across different devices and enables real-time testing."

"The Docker tunnel integration for local testing can be extremely useful to run on multiple instances in parallel."

"The technical support services are excellent."

"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."

More LambdaTest pros

"The most valuable feature is that it's user-friendly."

"It is the principle functionality that we're leveraging, which really can be defined as recordings and playbacks. So, you record the scripts that you want to execute and you also want to be able to playback. So, these are the features that we are largely leveraging. There are flows and scenarios, and they are the design aspects that fit within the playback and the recording solution. For me, they are the core of Qualibrate, and that's what we're using."

"What Qualibrate makes very easy to do is to record a process flow. Within five minutes you have a clear document produced by Qualibrate. Instead of using Word, and copying and pasting pictures into it from printscreens, within five minutes what you have was easy to make and it's easy for users to use."

"We use the solution’s Test Planning & test Execution Scheduling features, and they are very important. They are easy to work with. We use SAP Solution Manager, and Qualibrate works with it, enabling us to manage all our tests, taking them from Solution Manager directly into Qualibrate."

"The widget's ease of use is the most valuable, which means it allows you or business people to record the automated test scripts. In most cases, it is really good because it is the business people who actually know how the system is being used. The simplicity of the design is valuable, where you can record your transactions, then create your automated scripts. You can automate it at the same time, and the automation features are cool."

Cons

"I would like to see all of the features available in the freemium plan so that I can test them."

"The analytics over the automation dashboard can be more intuitive."

"Mobile application testing will be an added benefit for us if LambdaTest implements this really soon."

"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."

"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."

"It would be much easier for us to read the test if they provided dashboard analytics."

"Their smart testing module needs improvement."

"There is scope for improvement in service account usage, LDAP integration, and adapting new devices and features."

More LambdaTest cons

"What I would really like to see is if you are running scripts in Qualibrate, and there is a defect, then you can have it automatically raise a defect in your own ticketing system."

"Not everything in SAP works well with Qualibrate. There is a development tool called xpath and you have to program it. We always thought it wouldn't be necessary to program it with Qualibrate, that everything could be solved by Qualibrate without programming, but you have to program some things. Using xpath is more complicated, and not easy for everybody. It would be helpful if there were a no-code solution for this."

"What could be improved would be the intuitiveness of the reporting engine. It does have reporting, i.e., a dashboard, but it is preconfigured, predefined KPIs and datasets. That could be improved because the datasets don't have descriptions, so you really need to know what you're doing. Whereas, it would be great if it could have more descriptions and be easy to build your own KPIs."

"There is a module that we would like to have. We would like Qualibrate to design a requirements module so that we can design our testing, our flows, and our scenarios based on our actual requirements. Right now, we're doing that, but we're having to do it outside of Qualibrate. For example, in Excel, we might have a list of 50, 60, or 70 different requirements and combinations of tests that need to be executed, and since that module doesn't exist in Qualibrate, we're doing it offline. We have already vocalized that wishlist to them, and they have acknowledged it, but I have no idea when they're going to get around to deploying something like that. It is probably number one on our list."

"We had an issue with SAP when using PDF forms. That was something that was not supported by Qualibrate, but we solved that issue by choosing another solution. That was the only wish we had with Qualibrate."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"LambdaTest's pricing is cheaper than that of other similar platforms."

"LambdaTest is paid per execution."

"The tool is not cheap, but it is not expensive."

"The pricing for LambdaTest is affordable, and one of the reasons we implemented it."

"LambdaTest is on the cloud, offers both free and paid plans which start at $19 USD per month."

"The pricing could be made cheaper."

"From the customer side, LambdaTest is cheaper for big company usage and works fine as other similar applications."

"It is free to start, which means you can actually see how it works and then take the decision to buy."

More LambdaTest pricing and cost advice

"I compared the prices of the 15 solutions we looked at. Qualibrate was the most valuable because it could be integrated with SAP Solution Manager."

"Qualibrate is realistically priced. I can't compare it because I haven't looked at other tools, but I think it is good. What I like is you can simply add new users, if you want. It has a license model that comes with different types of users, which I think makes sense."

"We signed a three-year contract and the pricing is in line with our expectations."

"Automated testing is not cheap. But other companies, for example, Panaya, required a minimum of 10 licenses. Qualibrate allowed us to start small, with three licenses, with a price that was competitive within the market."

"We probably have 10 licenses, but I don't know what are the costs or anything like that."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

37%

Computer Software Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

Retailer

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LambdaTest?

We use the solution for automation testing and monitoring.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LambdaTest?

I am not responsible for the payments, but from what I hear, it costs about $30,000 a month, which is quite expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LambdaTest?

LambdaTest ( /products/lambdatest-reviews ) needs to improve its speed and memory because it takes a long time to load. The ease of installation is also an issue; they need to open up a few things ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

BrowserStack vs LambdaTest

Compared 67% of the time

Sauce Labs vs LambdaTest

Compared 16% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Perfecto vs LambdaTest

Compared 4% of the time

Testsigma vs LambdaTest

Compared 2% of the time

More LambdaTest Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest

April 2025

Download LambdaTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Qualibrate

March 2025

Download Qualibrate product report

Overview

LambdaTest is a cloud-based cross browser testing platform that helps enterprises run web automation tests at scale (through parallel testing).

**Selenium Automation Grid and Cypress CLI on LambdaTest**
You can attain better browser coverage by running tests across 2,000+ different browsers, devices, and operating systems online. LambdaTest provides a secure, scalable, and reliable cloud-based Selenium Grid that helps run Selenium tests at a faster pace.
The Cypress CLI on LambdaTest, helps you expand Cypress test coverage to 40+ browser versions across Windows and macOS platforms.
Along with automation testing, you can also perform manual tests, visual UI tests, and real-time tests.

**LT Browser - Responsive Web Testing**
Additionally, LambdaTest also offers LT browser - a path-breaking developer-oriented tool that helps assess the responsiveness of your website. LT Browser eases the task of mobile testing as responsive tests can run against 50+ different device resolutions.
You can also create custom device (or viewports) and test localhost URL without any extensions (or tunnels).

**Key Features of LambdaTest Platform**
1. Selenium Web Testing Automation.
2. Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing.
3. Run Cypress Tests Across 40+ Browser Versions Of Chrome, Firefox, and Edge.
4. Parallel Testing For Faster Go To Market Launch.
5. Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration Tools (e.g. Jenkins, Circle CI, GitLab CI, etc.).
6. Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing.
7. Scroll Sync To Test Two Viewports Simultaneously Using LT Browser App.
8. Faster Automated Screenshot Testing.
9. API For Continuous Testing.

LambdaTest

Undertaking a software transformation journey is a high risk. We offer a simple yet powerful solution to minimize the risk and reduce the implementation resources up to 80%.

Qualibrate is the cloud solution for SAP & web apps test automation, like Salesforce: it has the power of simplicity, customization, and integration with the most CI/CD tools. Test cases are highly reusable and easily maintainable.

All you need to do is to record a Business Process: user actions, test data, and technical information will be captured. The recording will be your unique source of truth for running Automated tests and Manual tests, but also for Learning.

Qualibrate

Sample Customers

Bringmax, Totpal, Nethhouse, Integreplanner, Cognizant, Vendisol, Clearscale, Edureka

AirFrance KLM, Provincie Noord Holland, Ministerie van Defensie, Nouryon, Bell Helicopter, Textron,

Buyer's Guide

LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

February 2025

Free Report: LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate

Find out what your peers are saying about LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LambdaTest vs. Qualibrate report.

See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors and best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.