Logpoint and One Identity Safeguard compete in the security and identity management category. Logpoint appears to have the upper hand in log management and cost-effectiveness, whereas One Identity Safeguard excels in access control and session auditing.
Features: Logpoint stands out with robust log management and integration efficiency, offering inbuilt SOAR functionality at no extra cost. It excels in providing flexibility in search features, making it a suitable choice for organizations looking for comprehensive SIEM solutions. One Identity Safeguard is strong in privileged access control with detailed session audits, four-eye authentication, and credential management, positioning it as a secure choice for managing user access across protocols.
Room for Improvement: Logpoint encounters challenges with log handling and customization of dashboards, requiring more advanced cloud-native deployment models and user-friendly interfaces. Improvements in user documentation and third-party integrations are necessary. One Identity Safeguard could benefit from better transparency and user interface organization, alongside enhanced integration capabilities and load management features. Scalability and support services are areas both brands can improve on.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Logpoint offers hybrid and public cloud deployment options, providing flexibility beyond on-premises models. Customer service experiences vary, with reports of a lack of skilled support staff. One Identity Safeguard primarily relies on on-premises deployment with generally responsive support that could improve in turnaround times and language skills.
Pricing and ROI: Logpoint provides a predictable pricing model not based on log volume, aiding in cost management and ROI calculations, but can become expensive when scaling. One Identity Safeguard has higher initial costs, favoring larger organizations. Its price offers robust performance but licensing scalability can impact ROI with increased expenses over time as usage grows.
Any PAM solution, when I deploy it well and customers use it, leads to a return on investment.
Logpoint's customer support is not sufficient with only one engineer in the US.
The technical support for Logpoint is very good, and I would rate it as nine out of ten.
I sometimes need escalations to reach expertise.
Sometimes, I get a very helpful response and they address issues on a call.
When I have day-to-day incidents and problems, the response is good enough in terms of time and quality.
It is web-based and accommodates the expansion of our organization.
Logpoint is scalable and capable of expanding.
The scalability of One Identity Safeguard is perfect, scoring ten out of ten.
We have a cluster of SPPs and a cluster of SPSs, and we can add a node to that cluster without much fuss.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for scalability.
I have received reports indicating glitches and downtimes with Logpoint.
I would rate it a nine out of ten for stability.
In terms of stability, I rate One Identity Safeguard nine to ten out of ten.
I encounter problems primarily with the failover procedure.
Dealing with foreign entities for support was a challenge, leading us to switch providers due to lack of adequate support.
Logpoint needs to be cloud-native, as currently, it is not.
For some configurations on the SPS side, if I need to make changes, such as for DNS servers, I must redeploy the machine.
There are many steps. We are still in the onboarding phase, and it seems very manual.
Another area for improvement could be the threat detection capabilities, like those seen in other PAM vendors.
I rate the pricing at eight, suggesting it's relatively good or affordable.
It is one of those where the more you buy, the cheaper it is.
It is cheaper than CyberArk.
It is more expensive than Secret Server but way less expensive than CyberArk.
The UEBA enables us to monitor at the device level, and SOAR provides playbooks and templates that we can modify and incorporate into the platform.
It effectively facilitates logging and log storage and assists in security event management by ingesting security events.
The auditing and approval mechanisms are features we did not have before and are greatly appreciated.
I think One Identity should improve its documentation because it is vast and not clear, and clear documentation on implementing the solution would be advantageous for consultants.
Compared to other PAM solutions, it is easy to implement and use from an administrator's point of view.
Logpoint is a cutting-edge security information and event management (SIEM) solution that is designed to be intuitive and flexible enough to be used by an array of different businesses. It is capable of expanding according to its users' needs.
Benefits of Logpoint
Some of the benefits of using Logpoint include:
Reviews from Real Users
Logpoint is a security and management solution that stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its data gathering and artificial intelligence (AI) capabilities. Logpoint enables users to not only gather the data, but also to maximize both the amount of data that can be gathered and its usefulness. It removes many of the challenges that users may face in data collection. The solution allows users to set rules for collection and then it pulls information from sources that meet the rules that have been set. This data is then broken into manageable segments and ordered. Users can then analyze these ordered segments with ease. Additionally, LogPoint utilizes both machine learning and AI technology. Users gain the ability to protect themselves from and if necessary resolve emerging threats as soon as they arise. The AI sets security parameters for a user’s system. These act as a baseline that are triggered and notify the user if anything deviates from the rules that it set up.
The chief infrastructure & security officer at a financial services firm writes, “It is a very comprehensive solution for gathering data. It has got a lot of capabilities for collecting logs from different systems. Logs are notoriously difficult to collect because they come in all formats. Logpoint has a very sophisticated mechanism for you to be able to connect to or listen to a system, get the data, and parse it. Logs come in text formats that are not easily parsed because all logs are not the same, but with Logpoint, you can define a policy for collecting the data. You can create a parser very quickly to get the logs into a structured mechanism so that you can analyze them.”
A. Secca., a Cyber Security Analyst at a transportation company, writes, “It is an AI technology because it is using machine learning technology. So far, there is nothing better out there for UEBA in terms of monitoring endpoints and user activity. It is using machine learning language, so it is right at the top. It provides that capability and monitors all of the user’s activities. It devises a baseline and monitors if there is any deviation from the baseline.”
One Identity Safeguard manages and monitors privileged access, enhancing security with features like automatic session recording, real-time monitoring, and credential rotation. It integrates seamlessly, supports compliance with audit trails, and improves operational efficiency across organizations. This robust platform significantly bolsters security protocols while controlling sensitive operations.
We monitor all User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
