LogRhythm NDR vs Lumu comparison

LogRhythm and Lumu Technologies are both solutions in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category. LogRhythm is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0, while Lumu Technologies is ranked #9 with an average rating of 9.2. LogRhythm holds a 0.9% mindshare in NDaR, compared to Lumu Technologies’s 3.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of LogRhythm users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Lumu Technologies users who would recommend it.

LogRhythm NDR

Read 3 LogRhythm NDR reviews

323 Views
234 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Lumu

Read 7 Lumu reviews

728 Views
410 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NDR

Lumu

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

LogRhythm NDR and Lumu compete in the network detection and response domain. Lumu is considered superior due to its cost-effectiveness and innovative features.

Features: LogRhythm NDR includes detailed threat detection, built-in analytics, and seamless integration, which serve to enhance the capabilities of cybersecurity teams. Lumu emphasizes continuous compromise assessments, network visibility, and proactive threat identification as key strengths.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Lumu employs a cloud-based deployment model that simplifies implementation and supports rapid scalability. LogRhythm NDR's deployment can be more complicated, potentially requiring additional resources. LogRhythm provides comprehensive customer support, while Lumu's straightforward deployment reduces the need for extensive assistance.

Pricing and ROI: LogRhythm NDR requires a higher initial investment, promising significant long-term benefits through its extensive capabilities. Lumu provides a more economical option, delivering high ROI through cost-cutting and effective threat monitoring. Its affordability makes Lumu appealing for budget-conscious environments.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NDR

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

19th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Lumu

Ranking in Network Detection and Response (NDR)

9th

Average Rating

9.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Intrusion Detection and Prevention Software (IDPS) (11th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (17th)

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Network Detection and Response (NDR) category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NDR is 0.9%, down from 1.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Lumu is 3.7%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

Featured Reviews

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A scalable and stable tool that offers users a great GUI

Though I have not extensively worked on LogRhythm NDR, I know the need for a compute side since, in the past, we had required the compute side to deploy the solution in one of our company's client's infrastructure. The product's setup phase was easy and not complicated. The deployment process of LogRhythm NDR can vary between three and four weeks, depending on the skill set of the people involved in the deployment process. For deployment of the product, you have to purchase the license from LogRhythm, and you have to ensure that the compute side is ready for LogRhythm. After you deploy NDR and sensors in the premises of our company's customer on the SPAN and TAP port, and once the logs go through throughput, you can see the logs coming to LogRhythm NDR's console.

Read full review

Juan Solano

IT Director at Atlantic Quantum Innovations

Protects against threats and handles it in time with moderate pricing

Mostly, Lumu is an automatic tool. We'll deploy on firewalls and DNS servers. Lumu detects every attack on our network. The other day, we had CLC, the command controller, and the tool reacted automatically. It detected the attack and immediately blocked it without intervention from my team. The improvement is in the security process, as it's now entirely automated. We no longer require a technician or engineer to monitor our network 24/7. Lumu updates with AI and global threat intelligence, which greatly assists us. Since our workload is lighter, Lumu handles all of our tasks. We're using FortiGate for the firewall and Kaspersky for endpoints. If you are going to Lumu, you need another solution for the endpoint. You need to integrate with other tools like firewalls or another antivirus. I recommend the solution based on the price, usability, and service offered by the solution. Overall, I rate the solution a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It's an excellent security tool with a user-friendly interface that's easy for anyone to use."

"It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution."

"The solution doesn't require the creation of rules or use cases from scratch, which assists our delivery team in installation and deployment. Its dashboard is user-friendly."

"I like Lumu's simple user interface. When we deployed it, we got full access, allowing us to identify IP addresses on the network and connect machine names to users. It helped us identify and block threats via the firewall. I also appreciate the chat support and ticket closure process. We're currently reviewing network detection solutions, and my recommendations include Lumu, Sentinel, and a few others. Regarding functionality and user-friendliness, I would recommend Lumu over the others."

"You can access external links, playbooks, MITRE Matrix, and a lot of information."

"Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time."

"The context provided by the tool is very complete, it includes the miter matrix, playbooks, links, hashes, and much more."

"Most of it is automated, so I do not have to watch it to get alerts."

"The tool's support team helps partners resolve any problems with the product."

"It's been helpful for overall extended network visibility."

Cons

"From an improvement perspective, I would like LogRhythm NDR to reduce the compute size. I would also like LogRhythm NDR to improve the pricing model."

"There are opportunities for improvement, particularly in upgrading the expertise of local professionals and addressing support issues, which could potentially lead to cost reduction."

"The tool has one limitation compared to its competitors. It does have a mobile app for NDR monitoring. Moreover, there is only operational training and not deployment training."

"The free version is minimal compared to the full version."

"The reports need improvement."

"Nothing so far needs to be improved."

"I am happy with the current features. However, one important one is to improve the reports."

"Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed."

"It would be good if we could access the physical logs."

"The integration with different vendors and endpoints could be improved."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool costs are two million rupees for 5000 users."

"When looking at the market and comparing it with other vendors, the cost seems relatively high."

"There are certain payments to be made towards the licensing costs attached to the product yearly. The pricing of LogRhythm NDR falls under the mid-range, in my opinion."

"The tool is available at a good price. The tool offers a good and competitive price for customers."

"Compared to Lumu, other solutions are more expensive. SentinelOne was a bit cheaper, and another provider's price structure is unclear, but Lumu fit our budget nicely. SentinelOne's cost depends on the number of devices, and it might be similar to Lumu's, depending on deployment."

"It is the cheapest solution we found."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

15%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

Financial Services Firm

Educational Organization

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

Government

10%

Insurance Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NDR?

It is a stable solution...It is a scalable solution.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NDR?

The tool costs are two million rupees for 5000 users.

See all answers

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NDR?

The tool has one limitation compared to its competitors. It does have a mobile app for NDR monitoring. Moreover, there is only operational training and not deployment training.

See all answers

What do you like most about Lumu?

Lumu protects against threats immediately and handles them in time.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Lumu?

Lumu's ability to discover threats is an area of concern where improvements are needed.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Lumu?

My company is currently dealing with Lumu's onboarding process. Lumu is used to monitor the environment permanently and validate if there is ransomware that can exploit our infrastructure.

See all answers

Comparisons

Darktrace vs LogRhythm NDR

Compared 71% of the time

More LogRhythm NDR Competitors

Darktrace vs Lumu

Compared 54% of the time

Stellar Cyber Open XDR vs Lumu

Compared 11% of the time

ExtraHop Reveal(x) vs Lumu

Compared 8% of the time

Fortinet FortiGate IPS vs Lumu

Compared 6% of the time

Splunk User Behavior Analytics vs Lumu

Compared 3% of the time

More Lumu Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

December 2024

Download LogRhythm NDR product report

Buyer's Guide

Network Detection and Response (NDR)

December 2024

Download Lumu product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm MistNet

No data available

Learn More

Video not available

LogRhythm

Lumu Technologies

Overview

Securing your network against advanced persistent threats (APTs) requires greater visibility to detect actors and their actions so that you can reduce your response time. As threats increase, real-time network detection and response (NDR) solutions are more critical than ever.

While other NDR solutions rely solely on machine learning (ML) based threat detection, LogRhythm uses hybrid analytics that combine machine learning, rules-based detection, and threat intelligence to analyze network, user, and host activity. This holistic approach provides a true representation of all activity within the enterprise domain, making it possible to detect lateral movement, exfiltration, malware compromise, ransomware, and other threats in real time.

Lumu Technologies is a cyber-security company that illuminates threats, attacks, and adversaries affecting enterprises worldwide. Using actionable intelligence, Lumu provides a radical way to secure networks by enhancing and augmenting existing defense capabilities established over the past 25 years.

Sample Customers

EMW, Conduent, University of Massachusetts, Deloitte Canada, Central Bank of Barbados, Coalfire

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu

December 2024

Free Report: LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu

Find out what your peers are saying about LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our LogRhythm NDR vs. Lumu report.

See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.

We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.