LogRhythm NetMon vs Zabbix comparison

Read 105 Zabbix reviews

17,501 Views
13,208 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

LogRhythm NetMon

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 10, 2024

Zabbix and LogRhythm NetMon compete in network monitoring solutions. Zabbix has the upper hand due to its cost-effectiveness and open-source framework, while LogRhythm NetMon is recognized for its in-depth network analytics and feature-rich offering.

Features:Zabbix provides automated network discovery, scalability, and integration with tools like Grafana. It monitors various devices and offers customizable features. LogRhythm NetMon is known for traffic analysis, threat detection, and deep packet inspection. Its strong integration with security solutions adds to its value.

Room for Improvement:Zabbix can improve in predictive trending, reporting, and UI flexibility. LogRhythm NetMon could enhance third-party tool integration, customization options, and training resources. Zabbix is more accessible for technical staff, but both need better user experience streamlining.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service:Zabbix is deployable across on-premises, hybrid, and public cloud environments and offers strong community support. LogRhythm NetMon supports primarily on-premises deployments. Zabbix's community support is effective, but LogRhythm's customer service could better communicate its capabilities.

Pricing and ROI:Zabbix is a free, open-source solution, making it highly cost-effective. LogRhythm NetMon incurs licensing costs and positions in the mid-to-high market range. Users justify the investment due to its advanced analytics and network insights.

To learn more, read our detailed LogRhythm NetMon vs. Zabbix Report (Updated: March 2025).

LogRhythm NetMon vs. Zabbix

Download the complete report

Helped 842,296 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

LogRhythm NetMon

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

60th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Zabbix

Ranking in Network Monitoring Software

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

105

Ranking in other categories

Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (8th), Server Monitoring (1st), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (1st), Cloud Monitoring Software (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Network Monitoring Software category, the mindshare of LogRhythm NetMon is 0.3%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zabbix is 12.6%, up from 11.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Monitoring Software

Featured Reviews

AshishDubey

Product manager at Tata Communications Ltd

A stable and scalable tool useful for network behavior analysis, DPA, and network forensic services

I have not worked much on LogRhythm NetMon to be able to comment on what needs improvement in the product since there is another team in our company that is working on the solution presently. LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently. With players like IBM QRadar that propose QNI or Darktrace in the market, LogRhythm NetMon needs to consider a reduction in its pricing model.

Read full review

ASM Naushad Alam

Network Manager at a financial services firm with 1,001-5,000 employees

Allows any number of customizations but lacks functionality for finding root causes

We have not yet purchased the commercial version so have a lack of technical ability. We do not yet fully know the key points or key features of the solution. We just use what we use along with WhatsUp Gold. Based on our use only, stability is rated a seven out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The analytics feature is the most valuable feature."

"The initial setup is straightforward because we can deploy an open server."

"The protocols with which you see the traffic for a particular website that a client has in their environment, for example, are valuable. We can monitor whether the traffic is up to the mark or whether they need to add more bandwidth. Also, we can see if we're able to get real-time environment data as well. The customization dashboard is really good. LogRhythm NetMon has its own in-built dashboards which are helpful in guiding customization."

"NetMon's best feature is traffic analysis."

"Visibility is a valuable feature, the ability to see even if the traffic is not going into the firewall"

"LogRhythm NetMon's most impressive feature is that it's a bundled package, so you're not just relying on monthly data; you get a six-month view for more comprehensive indicators of compromise. This dual approach is precious. We implement LogRhythm NetMon in our cybersecurity strategy mainly for compliance and correlation of network, user, and decision activities, particularly for network firewalls and access control."

"The most valuable feature is the log, which can be analyzed by our SIEM solution."

"It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine."

More LogRhythm NetMon pros

"It is a great product. The SNMP protocol tracking feature is good. I really like how it tracks SNMP. The alerts are also great."

"The most valuable feature is service assurance."

"The flexibility of this solution is amazing."

"They've already added extra features, such as noise-canceling and facial recognition, which is great."

"There is a problems page that shows us every warning or problem that occurs on our VMs globally. The map screen is also really useful because this is something that was missing. I don't know every other tool in the market. So, I don't know if this is a good point of only Zabbix, or other tools are also doing it, but from my point of view, this is the most useful page that I use, along with the problems page that efficiently lists the problem, recovery time, ending hours, starting hours, and so on."

"Zabbix is both stable and scalable."

"It has improved our server performance monitoring overall. We know right away when there are problems. It has built-in statistics, so we can go back and see if there's spiking. We can check what's happening every day around the same time and check the configuration to see if there's something that's running and needs to be fixed."

"It's one of the best products available."

More Zabbix pros

Cons

"I would like to see better integration with multiple products. Integration is not something that is readily available for most of the products."

"Sometimes it's hard to find the network devices' self-audit logs."

"The training for this product is not very good and needs to be improved."

"The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for easier management."

"There is an issue with tunneling in relation to how the connectivity is established between the end devices and where NetMon is installed. On the console, I often observe that there's a difference of a few seconds or maybe a minute, and this lag time should not be there."

"Could use a topology diagram which would help get an exact visual."

"LogRhythm NetMon's pricing model is an area of concern that should be made a little bit cheaper in comparison to the other players in the market currently."

"Some of the automated tasks we can perform on QRadar cannot be performed on LogRhythm because the solution has limitations."

More LogRhythm NetMon cons

"When we have a problem, we have to do a lot of research to solve it."

"Zabbix does not draw automatic mapping of the network, this is something they should add in the future. There is a lot of effort that is involved in tailoring some of the settings which could be made easier."

"There are not too much documentation or manuals. We found the tutorials very easy to understand but do not go deep enough in the use of Zabbix. We need more manuals, proper use, documentation, etc."

"I am having difficulties connecting it to Grafana, as well as some of the other plugins like Kibana."

"They should open an SSH session from the web interface."

"Having a more customizable interface and dashboard would be an improvement."

"The dashboard and the graph section could be a little bit more professional."

"I would like to better be able to monitor Oracle processes."

More Zabbix cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Pricing is okay. There were some competitors that were extremely expensive and there were some which were really inexpensive but LogRhythm stayed in the middle of them."

"The product is expensive for smaller companies."

"NetMon's licensing costs about $85k per year, with some extra costs for support."

"LogRhythm's licensing part is something that depends on the license you want since they offer it on a perpetual and subscription basis."

"I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships."

"The price of this solution is too high, so it should be made more practical and more valuable for the customer."

"Zabbix is free but if you use it in production then you have to pay for it."

"We are using the free, open-source version."

"We pay the subscription for support by year."

"We were searching for an open source solution and Zabbix fit the bill because it is free and open source under the GPL license."

"This solution is completely open-source, so it is quite affordable."

"There is no license but we need to pay for support."

"For pricing, it's free. We don't pay anything for it. They open-source the code, and people pay for support."

"We’re using the free version, which covers all our current needs."

More Zabbix pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,296 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user174738

IT Developer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees

May 31, 2015

Nagios vs. Zabbix vs. PRTG vs. Spiceworks vs. Solarwinds Network Performance Monitor

I have researched a quite a few network monitoring tools which can be used for various monitoring purposes of not only the servers, but the intermediate routers as well. There are majorly three types of these softwares. Ones which are completely open-source, you can do almost anything you want…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

25%

Computer Software Company

20%

Government

Insurance Company

Educational Organization

37%

Computer Software Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about LogRhythm NetMon?

It has a very strong artificial intelligence engine.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for LogRhythm NetMon?

I don't have visibility into the pricing of LogRhythm NetMon as it's handled through our commercial partnerships.

What needs improvement with LogRhythm NetMon?

The main concern is that LogRhythm has not improved NetMon but instead introduced a separate product, which many customers, including us, would prefer to be integrated into a single platform for ea...

What do you like most about Zabbix?

The template system in Zabbix is very beneficial as it saves time in configuration.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Zabbix?

The cost is minimal. It is literally free.

What needs improvement with Zabbix?

For me, Zabbix is very straightforward. I cannot think of any improvements needed. It's a very mature product. The only issue I can note is that it's Linux-based, and Linux documentation is not the...

PRTG Network Monitor vs LogRhythm NetMon

Comparisons

SCOM vs LogRhythm NetMon

Compared 50% of the time

Compared 50% of the time

More LogRhythm NetMon Competitors

LibreNMS vs Zabbix

Compared 10% of the time

Checkmk vs Zabbix

Compared 9% of the time

Icinga vs Zabbix

Compared 8% of the time

NetXMS vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

Centreon vs Zabbix

Compared 4% of the time

More Zabbix Competitors

Product Reports

LogRhythm NetMon

Download LogRhythm NetMon product report

Download Zabbix product report

Also Known As

LogRhythm Network Monitor

No data available

Overview

Identify Emerging Threats on Your Network in Real Time

Transform your physical or virtual system into a network forensics sensor in a matter of minutes for free with LogRhythm's NetMon Freemium. Your investigations will come together effortlessly with extensive corresponding metadata, full packet capture, and customizable advanced correlation.. Detect network-based threats with real-time network monitoring and big data analytics

Get the visibility you need with NetMon.

LogRhythm

Zabbix is an open-source monitoring software that provides real-time monitoring and alerting for servers, networks, applications, and services.

It offers a wide range of features including data collection, visualization, and reporting.

With its user-friendly interface and customizable dashboards, Zabbix helps organizations ensure the availability and performance of their IT infrastructure.

Sample Customers

Sera-Brynn

1. IBM 2. Dell 3. Cisco 4. HP 5. Oracle 6. Microsoft 7. Amazon 8. Google 9. Facebook 10. Twitter 11. LinkedIn 12. Netflix 13. Adobe 14. VMware 15. Salesforce 16. SAP 17. Intel 18. AT&T 19. Verizon 20. T-Mobile 21. Vodafone 22. Ericsson 23. Nokia 24. Siemens 25. General Electric 26. Honeywell 27. Philips 28. Sony 29. Samsung 30. LG 31. Panasonic 32. Toshiba

LogRhythm NetMon vs. Zabbix