Portnox vs macmon Network Access Control comparison

macmon secure and Portnox Security are both solutions in the Network Access Control (NAC) category. macmon secure is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Portnox Security is ranked #7 with an average rating of 7.8. macmon secure holds a 2.5% mindshare in NAC, compared to Portnox Security’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of macmon secure users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 93% of Portnox Security users who would recommend it.

macmon Network Access Control

Read 3 macmon Network Access Control reviews

1,995 Views
703 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Portnox

Read 21 Portnox reviews

1,573 Views
876 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

macmon Network Access Control

Portnox

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 9, 2025

Portnox and macmon Network Access Control are competing solutions in network access control. Portnox takes the lead in pricing and customer service, while macmon stands out with its comprehensive feature set.

Features: Portnox supports seamless integration with cloud services, offers detailed visibility into device compliance, and is highly adaptable for varied environments. macmon Network Access Control is recognized for its robust security features, including advanced authentication mechanisms, intricate network segmentation, and a more extensive feature set that can be crucial for enterprises requiring advanced security functions.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Portnox provides a simplified deployment model with rapid setup and ease of integration with existing systems. Its customer service is responsive and helpful. macmon Network Access Control has a more complex setup process due to its intricate features; however, thorough training and documentation help mitigate the complexity.

Pricing and ROI: Portnox offers a competitive pricing structure with lower initial setup costs, providing a quicker ROI for budget-conscious organizations. macmon Network Access Control requires a higher initial investment, but its extensive security capabilities can result in a higher long-term ROI for businesses demanding robust security across extensive networks.

To learn more, read our detailed Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

macmon Network Access Control

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

9th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Portnox

Ranking in Network Access Control (NAC)

7th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

ZTNA (11th), Passwordless Authentication (2nd)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Network Access Control (NAC) category, the mindshare of macmon Network Access Control is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Portnox is 3.3%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Network Access Control (NAC)

Featured Reviews

Yusuf Oezeren

Senior System Engineer at MOD IT GmbH

A robust solution that provides protection to effectively control the access to your network

The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly. The interface is user-friendly but, for example, when we have new people starting to work, they never work with NetOne and it is a bit hard to expand in certain places. In addition, when I have to pull the last corrected MAC address, I need to put the space between it in order to find the address. If I don't put it in there, I don't get any resources. This needs improvement. They should maybe add integration with LanSuite. We can include it to see the direct information we get from our LAN Tree. If I click on the MAC address, I will then directly get the hostname, and that will open a tap-in line so I see what the last update was.

Read full review

Scott Kerr

President at TrackerSoft

It is seamless and integrates well with our Azure setup

We use devices like PLCs and controllers, and when we receive a request to allow one on the network, we bypass typical authentication, associate it with a group account, and push it to a firewalled VLAN. However, problems arise when the same MAC address is requested for a different project. Our current system only finds authenticated MAC addresses, making it difficult to troubleshoot when the same device is used for multiple purposes. Ideally, we should be able to search for any MAC address in the database, regardless of its authentication status, to see all its associated groups and potential conflicts.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We use it with our Cisco switches so we can see which switch it is actually connected to."

"The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me."

"The API is a great way to get information from other tools."

"It's agentless, and it's scalable."

"It's so easy to set up, you don't need outside assistance."

"This is a self-sufficient network monitoring and security product that saves time and employee resources."

"The product's initial setup phase was straightforward."

"The most important feature is that this solution is agentless. So, you don't have to install any agents on endpoints."

"I like the fact that you can take your device anywhere and still have that visibility from anywhere because it's agent-based."

"Technical support was very helpful when we needed them."

"The Portnox dashboard is very easy to use, and the UI is simple."

More Portnox pros

Cons

"The service macmon offers is already great."

"The solution must allow users to filter files based on dates."

"The single sign-on process can be improved and the interface should be made more user-friendly."

"The solution did have some stability issues, however, all I had to do was restart it."

"The integration between Portnox CORE and Portnox CLEAR can be better. These are two different systems, and there is no unique console for both devices. Portnox CORE is agentless, whereas Portnox CLEAR is not agentless."

"The price could be better."

"The product should consider more integration with vendors like Huawei. It should also improve visibility. The solution should offer a partner portal that can provide customers training on the in and out of the solution."

"It might be beneficial to improve the ease of integrating the product with firewalls."

"We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE."

"Their filtering system tends to lag quite a bit, so when I'm doing filtering at times, it doesn't filter the items properly."

"One of the things for the on-premise is that sometimes you click on it and it takes a while for it to respond."

More Portnox cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution is not expensive."

"The licensing module should be reviewed to count the number of devices instead of port numbers of total switches. There is a case for this where not all ports for a switch are used by devices. Unused ports are calculated in the license, then the customer pays for license for those unused ports."

"The pricing is a bit high, possibly due to the cloud features and running instances across regions like the US, Asia, and Europe."

"It is not bad. It is a bit on the high side, but considering the cloud features and how much it costs to run the instance in the cloud, it is not unreasonable. We do have RADIUS servers for the US, Asia, and Europe."

"Pricing is not cheap. It is based on licenses per port. After licensing is purchased, you only pay for support."

"The solution is very expensive and I would rate it 10 out of 10."

"It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle."

"The users are not very happy with the new licensing option where there is only a subscription license. There is no perpetual license."

"Portnox CORE's pricing is adequate and cheaper compared to other complex solutions. Its licensing costs are yearly and include support. Cost is calculated per device."

More Portnox pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Network Access Control (NAC) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Government

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

16%

Computer Software Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Comms Service Provider

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about macmon Network Access Control?

The ease of connecting with the client is valuable for me.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for macmon Network Access Control?

The solution is not expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with macmon Network Access Control?

There is no information on the protocol where the clients stop to authenticate. There are some policies, but I don't know whether the device stopped on the authentication or authorization levels. I...

See all answers

What do you like most about Portnox CORE?

It's easy to manage and troubleshoot thanks to the lightweight components.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Portnox CORE?

It's not cheap. It's not expensive. It's in the middle, so I'll probably give it a seven out of ten, where one is cheap and ten is expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Portnox CORE?

We have been having some issues with it. That's why we're considering migrating to Portnox Clear due to some limitations with CORE. At the end of the day, Portnox Clear's capabilities are much more...

See all answers

Comparisons

Aruba ClearPass vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 49% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 25% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 19% of the time

Forescout Platform vs macmon Network Access Control

Compared 6% of the time

More macmon Network Access Control Competitors

Aruba ClearPass vs Portnox

Compared 30% of the time

Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) vs Portnox

Compared 26% of the time

Fortinet FortiNAC vs Portnox

Compared 18% of the time

Forescout Platform vs Portnox

Compared 16% of the time

SecureW2 vs Portnox

Compared 6% of the time

More Portnox Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

macmon Network Access Control

March 2025

Download macmon Network Access Control product report

Buyer's Guide

Portnox

March 2025

Download Portnox product report

Also Known As

macmon NAC

Access Layers Portnox, Portnox CLEAR

Interactive Demo

Demo not available

macmon secure

Portnox Security

Overview

With macmon Network Access Control you always know which devices are connected to your network and where. It provides profound protection for your corporate network and is a centralized security authority that protects your network against intrusion from unauthorized devices, and ensures the complete overview of all your devices.

UFOs (unknown frightening objects) are a thing of the past, as all your devices such as PCs, printers, laptops, medical and technical devices are identified at any time, efficiently monitored and protected against unauthorized access. Guest and employee devices (BYOD) can be easily and securely authorized via the macmon guest service using dynamic management of network segmentation.

To protect your network against unauthorized access, macmon provides two efficient product bundles as well as additional Add-Ons.

Find out more:
- macmon NAC Bundles
- macmon NAC features

macmon secure

Portnox offers Network Access Control to manage user access based on policy, securing both wired and wireless networks while ensuring compliance. It supports endpoint security and prevents unauthorized access across industries such as banking, IT, and energy distribution.

Designed for both on-premises and cloud deployments through CORE and Clear versions, Portnox delivers a straightforward interface aiding in deployment. It integrates effectively with equipment from multiple vendors and security solutions, enhancing endpoint profiling and ensuring compliance. Portnox provides real-time alerts and network activity insights, bolstered by excellent technical support and scalability. It also automates monitoring, reducing the need for dedicated resources while offering a comprehensive view of network activities.

What are the essential features of Portnox?

Comprehensive Network Visibility: Delivers detailed insights into network activity.
Agentless Operation: Simplifies deployment without requiring additional software on endpoints.
Seamless Integration: Works well with diverse equipment and security systems.
Real-Time Alerts: Immediate notifications for unauthorized activities.
Scalability: Accommodates growing network needs without adding complexity.

What benefits should users focus on in Portnox reviews?

Ease of Deployment: Quick setup without complex processes.
Security Capabilities: Strong defense against unauthorized access and breaches.
Automatic Monitoring: Continuously observes network traffic, requiring fewer resources.
Intuitive Insights: Clear visualization of network operations aids decision-making.
Reliable Support: Access to helpful technical assistance when needed.

Across industries like banking and IT, organizations rely on Portnox for endpoint profiling and compliance, ensuring remote worker security. Electricity distributors leverage its robust features for managing secure network access. Improvements like better third-party integration, enhanced graphical interface, and expanded support are desired, along with licensing adjustment and expanded use of AI and behavioral analytics.

Portnox Security

Sample Customers

More than 1,500 installations in all over Europe in all industries: Stepchange, Volkswagen, Vivantes Healthcare, MBDA Weapons, APS engineering, Alfred Ritter GmbH (Ritter Sport), Haßberg-Kliniken, 1. FSV Mainz 05 eV., Siempelkamp, AEB etc.

Data Realty, Royal London, Wales Millennium Centre, McLaren Construction Group, EL AL Israeli Airlines,

Buyer's Guide

Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

March 2025

Free Report: Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control

Find out what your peers are saying about Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Portnox vs. macmon Network Access Control report.

See our list of best Network Access Control (NAC) vendors.

We monitor all Network Access Control (NAC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.