Magic xpi Integration Platform vs webMethods.io comparison

"The stability of the solution is OK."

"The Software AG Designer has been great. It's very intuitive."

"One of the most important features is that it gives you the possibility to do low-level integration. It provides a lot of features out of the box, and over the years, it has matured so much that any problem that is there in the market can be solved with this product. We can meet any requirements through customizations, transformations, or the logic that needs to be put in. Some of the other products struggle in this aspect. They cannot do things in a certain way, or they have a product limitation, whereas, with webMethods, I have never faced this kind of problem."

"I like the stability of the webMethods Integration Server."

"The solution's ease-of-use is its most valuable feature, in which complex issues may be resolved."

"The performance is good."

"Ease of implementation and flexibility to hold the business logic are the most valuable features."

"The most valuable feature of the webMethods Integration Server is the built-in monitoring, auditing, RETS, and SOAP services."

"They are the building blocks of EAI in SAG products, and they offer a very good platform."

"It is not performing well."

"For code version control, you need to use some external software."

"wM SAP Adapter User Guide - Example, like Message Broker setup was unclear, leading to issues during Testing and we had refer the internet forums to understand that there is a Message Broker Cleanup utility and that needs to be setup as well."

"Rapid application development has to be considered, especially for UI, where user interference is crucial."

"Some of the things that we use cannot be done in this solution. For these things, we have to either use a Java service or a util service. There is no predefined or existing service that we can use. So, we have to work on the util service and write on top of it. Its price can also be better. It is pretty costly because they charge us for each transmission."

"t doesn't represent OOP very well, just a method and proprietary interface called IData."

"The on-premises setup can be difficult."

"The certifications and learning resources are not exposed openly enough. For instance, they have a trial version which comes with only a few basic features, and I think that community-wise they need to offer more free or open spaces where developers can feel encouraged to experiment."

"The product needs to be improved in a few ways. First, they need to stabilize the components of the whole platform across versions. Also, they should stop replacing old components with brand new ones and, rather, improve by evolution."

"This is not a cheap solution but, compared to other products such as those offered by IBM, the pricing is similar."

"webMethods Integration Server is expensive, and there's no fixed price on it because it has a point pricing model. You can negotiate, which makes it interesting."

"It's a good deal for the money that we pay."

"The price is a little bit high, especially regarding their support."

"This is an expensive product and we may replace it with something more reasonably priced."

"The pricing is a yearly license."

"It is expensive, but we reached a good agreement with the company. It is still a little bit expensive, but we got a better deal than the previous one."

"The product is expensive."