Malwarebytes Teams vs Trend Micro ServerProtect comparison

Malwarebytes and Trend Micro are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.7, while Trend Micro is ranked #38 with an average rating of 8.3. Malwarebytes holds a 2.2% mindshare in EPP, compared to Trend Micro’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of Trend Micro users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes Teams

Read 37 Malwarebytes Teams reviews

4,062 Views
3,412 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Read 18 Trend Micro ServerProtect reviews

2,136 Views
2,072 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes Teams

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Malwarebytes Teams and Trend Micro ServerProtect both compete in the security solutions category. While Malwarebytes Teams is favored for its pricing and remote management, Trend Micro ServerProtect is seen as having superior features, particularly in advanced server protection.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams offers cloud-based management and extensive threat detection, simplifying use across user levels. Its anti-exploit and malware removal features are strong points. Trend Micro ServerProtect provides virtual patching and central management, efficiently covering system-wide security with its virtualization capabilities. Its strength in server protection with flexible and real-time insights is noteworthy.

Room for Improvement: Malwarebytes Teams is critiqued for false positives and high CPU usage during scans, with suggestions for improved reporting, integration, and ransomware rollback features. Trend Micro ServerProtect could enhance deployment ease and alert notifications, with noted configuration complexity and high pricing also needing attention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams allows deployment across various cloud platforms with generally praised customer support. While setup is considered easy, complex issues might need better handling. Trend Micro ServerProtect's versatility is noted, though users face challenges in deployment and find support responsiveness lacking, despite generally satisfactory results.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams is competitively priced, viewed positively for its detection efficiency and ROI despite being slightly more expensive than some alternatives. Trend Micro ServerProtect, though more costly, offers flexible licensing with a significant ROI attributed to productivity gains, likened to an insurance policy against breaches.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect Report (Updated: December 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

December 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 881,036 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes Teams

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Trend Micro ServerProtect

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

38th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 2.2%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro ServerProtect is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Malwarebytes Teams	2.2%
Trend Micro ServerProtect	0.8%
Other	97.0%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Davina Becker

Senior Content Strategist at PeerSpot

Provides protection against malware but needs improved billing transparency

I can only speak to it on a personal level. If someone is considering it, they should test it on their own systems. I can't personally recommend it because each person has their own needs. While it may work for me as a malware antivirus solution, I can't recommend it to someone else who may have a different system or use case. I rate the overall solution 7.5 out of 10. Malwarebytes protects me against malware. If they fix the pricing model so it's not automatically charging me, the rating could improve. Until then, I can't give it an 8.

Read full review

Emmanuel Okoroji

Head, Threat Intelligence & Incident Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Advanced server defenses have strengthened threat detection and protected critical infrastructure

From my perspective, predictive analysis is an area for improvement. The rules are very rigid. The way protection works for Trend Micro ServerProtect is that you have to specifically apply specific rules to achieve particular actions or use cases. We have had instances where a malware is dropped and that malware executes, it is detected, but because the malware has been altered a little bit, either in naming or slight behavior changes, the system is not able to stop it. This is unless you harden the rule to say block anything that appears out of place. My thinking as a security expert is that malware will typically behave outside of the normal operation of the organization. Instead of saying malware behavior based on malware behavior, I would say use analytics to identify anything that is outside the normal behavior of files and systems in the course of business operation, then flag it so it can go for further evaluation to identify if it is a malicious file execution or otherwise. Today, there are some instances where legitimate operations occur because of the static rule definition, the agent would flag a normal activity as malicious and then sometimes flag malicious activities as normal. They need to work on that area. There is a lot of competition today. When Trend Micro ServerProtect initially came out, they were premium, so there was not a lot of competition. Competition is dropping their price. Trend Micro ServerProtect should also come down on the pricing to meet competition. Though it is a great solution and an integrated solution, I think they should also meet the market competition. CrowdStrike is there, Palo Alto is there. There are many other competitors, but they need to also look at what is happening. They need to work on it. I would not say that they are overly priced, but I think they can be more competitive, especially with their new credit allocation process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product provides notifications for suspicious events. We have several public access points. The product helps to prevent unauthorized entry. Its most valuable features are pre-installation procedures and a cloud console. The console's interface is simple and can be viewed easily to take action. It covers everything in terms of security threats."

"Provides successful ransomware shut down operations."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"It comprehensively finds and removes malicious software."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"Being able to carry out a full scan on your system."

"The behavior-based detection is very nice, and it combats zero-day threats by looking for anomalous behaviors."

"The most valuable feature is its ability to customize for different groups."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

"Performance is very good."

"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."

"The most valuable feature is Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."

"I use this solution for data blocking, software protection, and frame protection."

"It helps us quickly address potential issues and provides us with valuable insights."

"Scalable security solution with virtualization and virtual patching functions, able to provide full security that's specific to the service, e.g. it handles virtual machines better."

"It can be managed from the cloud."

"The most valuable features are the anti-malware and antivirus capabilities."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect pros

Cons

"The product has major problems in almost every facet of setup and use including setup, configuration, lack of functionality, lack of stability, false positives, questionable reporting, inability to protect from randsomeware and poor technical support and development."

"The product update capability needs to be improved."

"Strictly in terms of cyber security, the release cycle should be quarterly, at most. It shouldn't be more frequent than that because, for one thing, keeping up with tech support is difficult."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"They can include advanced scanning and improve reporting. I scan malware on the pen drive. Some more reports need to be added for that. It should also provide better protection because we have a new version of the malware."

"Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability."

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"I would like to see a little more detail in the log. So, when an event occurs, I'd like to know not just when it happened and on what device, but what activity was taking place on the machine at the time so that we can drill down. If we get a false positive, we have to do a lot of research and go back and forth with our end-users to know why it was a false positive. So, having a little more detail around detections and events would probably be my most asked feature."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

"Could include additional features such as an intrusion prevention system."

"The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs"

"It's more about awareness and maintaining competitive pricing because competition is growing."

"I would like to see SMS notifications sent as alerts, in case we do not have access to our email."

"Sometimes I try to find the real source of why there is a message, but I cannot determine if it is beneficial because I am missing deeper information."

"One thing I have been facing is that some fake threats have appeared that even Trend Micro was not able to clear up. It couldn't tell you why these threats are happening, where they are coming from and what the costs are."

"They need to improve in this area by providing more documentation and custom scripts for bulk enterprise deployments."

"The cost is very high and it should be lower to be more competitive."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

"This product has an annual subscription, but also offers MSP options."

"Pricewise, this product is okay."

"The product is available at a reasonable price"

"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers."

"In terms of price, the solution is in the middle; it's neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. I rate it three out of five for cost."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

I am aware of the price of this solution. The price is good, and the licensing is fair.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Trend Micro ServerProtect?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

Trend Micro ServerProtect is basically a server protection solution. Given the system architecture, there is endpoint protection, the APEX, and then there is the server end protection. That is exac...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 13% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 4% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 15% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 14% of the time

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 11% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 8% of the time

Trend Vision One Endpoint Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect

Compared 8% of the time

More Trend Micro ServerProtect Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

January 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

Trend Micro ServerProtect

January 2026

Download Trend Micro ServerProtect product report

Also Known As

No data available

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage

Overview

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, powered by XGen security, leverages a blend of cross-generational threat protection techniques to safeguard a wide range of network attached storage systems by detecting and removing viruses and spyware in real time. This comprehensive storage security uses the industry-standard ICAP protocol to complement support for traditional RPC communication protocols. To simplify network protection for EMC, NetApp, and Hitachi Data Systems storage systems, ServerProtect for Storage provides automatic, incremental security updates and centralized management of servers via a web-based console.

Trend Micro

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

Siemens

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

December 2025

Free Report: Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect and other solutions. Updated: December 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

881,036 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.