Malwarebytes Teams vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] comparison

Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Download the complete report

Helped 882,886 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.4%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is 0.8%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.4%
Malwarebytes Teams	2.1%
Trend Micro ServerProtect	0.8%
Other	93.7%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

Davina Becker

Senior Content Strategist at PeerSpot

Provides protection against malware but needs improved billing transparency

I can only speak to it on a personal level. If someone is considering it, they should test it on their own systems. I can't personally recommend it because each person has their own needs. While it may work for me as a malware antivirus solution, I can't recommend it to someone else who may have a different system or use case. I rate the overall solution 7.5 out of 10. Malwarebytes protects me against malware. If they fix the pricing model so it's not automatically charging me, the rating could improve. Until then, I can't give it an 8.

Read full review

Emmanuel Okoroji

Head, Threat Intelligence & Incident Management at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees

Advanced server defenses have strengthened threat detection and protected critical infrastructure

From my perspective, predictive analysis is an area for improvement. The rules are very rigid. The way protection works for Trend Micro ServerProtect is that you have to specifically apply specific rules to achieve particular actions or use cases. We have had instances where a malware is dropped and that malware executes, it is detected, but because the malware has been altered a little bit, either in naming or slight behavior changes, the system is not able to stop it. This is unless you harden the rule to say block anything that appears out of place. My thinking as a security expert is that malware will typically behave outside of the normal operation of the organization. Instead of saying malware behavior based on malware behavior, I would say use analytics to identify anything that is outside the normal behavior of files and systems in the course of business operation, then flag it so it can go for further evaluation to identify if it is a malicious file execution or otherwise. Today, there are some instances where legitimate operations occur because of the static rule definition, the agent would flag a normal activity as malicious and then sometimes flag malicious activities as normal. They need to work on that area. There is a lot of competition today. When Trend Micro ServerProtect initially came out, they were premium, so there was not a lot of competition. Competition is dropping their price. Trend Micro ServerProtect should also come down on the pricing to meet competition. Though it is a great solution and an integrated solution, I think they should also meet the market competition. CrowdStrike is there, Palo Alto is there. There are many other competitors, but they need to also look at what is happening. They need to work on it. I would not say that they are overly priced, but I think they can be more competitive, especially with their new credit allocation process.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I generally believe that Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is probably the best in the market right now."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is easy to use and does not consume a lot of hardware resources."

"The initial setup is pretty easy."

"The interface is easy to use and it is more up to date than our previous solution."

"Has great threat detection capabilities."

"One of the main benefits of the solution is its intelligence to correlate the events into an incident."

"Cortex Xnor's playbooks predefine the workflow of the automation, such as response processes, alert triggering, and enriching the context, collecting relevant indicators such as hashes, IP addresses, or domains efficiently and can detect and block malicious attacks with firewalls."

"We can use Cortex XDR to get the entire graph of the incidents from source to destination, and we can take remedial action."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"The installation process is very easy, especially since it is on the cloud."

"The pricing of the product is very good."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"The most valuable features of Malwarebytes are the EDR and the complete feature set provided."

"The most valuable feature of the solution is that I can use it wherever I want, be it at the office, at home, or even outside."

"Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience."

"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."

"We have seen a decrease of approximately ninety percent in the number of events."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

"ServerProtect's best feature is virtual patching, which takes care of patching even if your servers aren't updated with the latest threat definitions."

"I use this solution for data blocking, software protection, and frame protection."

"Virtual Batching and the intelligent anti-malware components are valuable security tools."

"Allows us to protect OneDrive and SharePoint, and emails too."

"The most valuable feature is Data Loss Prevention (DLP)."

"The most beneficial aspects of Trend Micro ServerProtect are its user-friendly console, allowing anyone to configure policies easily, and the excellent support provided."

"It can be managed from the cloud."

"The staff went above and beyond to make sure our experience was unforgettable, accommodating every request with a smile and genuine care."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] pros

Cons

"They have the worst support, as a company, that I have ever worked with, as they are difficult to get a hold of and keep on the phone. They don't know what they are talking about when you get them on the phone. They don't like to respond to messages when you send them to them. They like to "research problems" for weeks on end, then pass you off to somebody else."

"The server sometimes stops continuously to check things so it would be helpful to receive access updates or technical reasons."

"Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"Every 30 or 40 days, there's a new version and we need to go and make sure our customer's laptops are upgraded."

"It is not easy to sell Cortex XDR, not because it isn't a good tool. Its marketing needs to be improved."

"There are a large number of false positives."

"There are some false positives. What our guys would have liked is that it would have been easier to manipulate as soon as they found a false positive that they knew was a false positive. How to do so was not obvious. Some people complained about it. The interface, the ESM, is not user-friendly."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"The product update capability needs to be improved."

"There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity."

"I really hate the automatic rebuilding without even asking. It's just an annoyance that they should at least ask me, like a month before they bill me."

"This solution reports far too many false positives!"

"The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it."

"The product has major problems in almost every facet of setup and use including setup, configuration, lack of functionality, lack of stability, false positives, questionable reporting, inability to protect from randsomeware and poor technical support and development."

"The reporting is not as flexible as you would find with other antivirus software."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

"Notifications are not very good with Trend Micro."

"It's more about awareness and maintaining competitive pricing because competition is growing."

"We found that when we push Trend Micro from the console to our client's PCs, we need to manually restart the PC. I have 500 users and the manual input is time-consuming."

"I would like to see SMS notifications sent as alerts, in case we do not have access to our email."

"No built-in vulnerability scanner for management solutions."

"The solution should provide features to block devices, specific IPs or URLs"

"Lacking analytics and a machine learning technique."

"There are a few areas of improvement. Despite its high performance, there are certain aspects related to the operating system that could be improved. Specifically, I find that the protection for certain actions requires more effort compared to other actions."

More Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"This is an expensive solution."

"Licensing for Palo Alto Networks Cortex XDR can be costly, especially when it comes to a hundred users. A license is required for each user, and the subscription must be renewed on a yearly basis."

"Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is an expensive solution."

"I don't recall what the cost was, but it wasn't really that expensive."

"The price of the solution could be reduced. I have customers that have voiced that the solution is good for the value but if I want to sell more of the solution the price reduction would help."

"Every customer has to pay for a license because it doesn't work with what you get from a managed services provider."

"It has a yearly renewal."

"I am using the Community edition."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"I would say that it's affordable. It costs much less than Sentinel One, CrowdStrike, or anything of that nature. But, at the same time, you are getting what you pay for. So I would say it's one of the best when you're comparing traditional NextGen AVs like Webroot that aren't the best in the bunch."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

"Pricewise, this product is okay."

"In terms of price, the solution is in the middle; it's neither the cheapest nor the most expensive. I rate it three out of five for cost."

"Pricing is based on the components you choose from the suite to run in your installation. Costs vary by the number of features and the number of servers."

"This product has an annual subscription, but also offers MSP options."

"The product is available at a reasonable price"

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,886 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

10%

Performing Arts

Computer Software Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	42
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	47

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	12
Midsize Enterprise	3
Large Enterprise	4

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

I am aware of the price of this solution. The price is good, and the licensing is fair.

What needs improvement with Trend Micro ServerProtect?

From my perspective, predictive analysis is an area for improvement. The rules are very rigid. The way protection wor...

What is your primary use case for Trend Micro ServerProtect?

Trend Micro ServerProtect is basically a server protection solution. Given the system architecture, there is endpoint...

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Comparisons

Compared 9% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

F-Secure Total vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 3% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

HP Wolf Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Compared 14% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

TrendAI Vision One – Endpoint Security vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum vs Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

Compared 8% of the time

More Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] Competitors

Product Reports

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Malwarebytes Teams

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]

January 2026

Download Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

Trend Micro ServerProtect for Storage, ServerProtect, ServerProtect for Storage

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] offers robust server and endpoint protection with antivirus and malware detection. It's designed for seamless integration with existing infrastructure, focusing on data loss prevention and real-time threat insights.

Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] provides centralized management through the cloud, ensuring comprehensive security without the need for separate agents on virtualization nodes. While it boasts features like virtual patching and a straightforward interface, there's a call for improved integration and more intuitive console features. Users appreciate its competitive pricing and minimal maintenance but express a need for enhancements in deployment, analytics, and notification options.

What are the key features of Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]?

Virtual Batching: Offers timely updates without needing to install separate agents for each VM.
Data Loss Prevention: Protects sensitive data from unauthorized access and breaches.
Centralized Management: Streamlines security operations via the cloud for ease of control.
Real-Time Insights: Provides immediate intelligence into threats to ensure proactive defense.
User-Friendly Interface: Simplifies policy configuration and reduces the learning curve.

What ROI should users expect from Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]?

Enhanced Security: Strong detection capabilities reduce the risk of threats.
Reduced False Alarms: Accurate threat detection respects normal operations.
Lower Maintenance: Minimal upkeep requirements free up internal resources.
Competitive Pricing: Offers cost-effective protection solutions compared to alternatives.

In industries like finance and healthcare, Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL] is deployed to secure data and applications such as SharePoint and OneDrive. It's used in hybrid environments where protecting against ransomware and ensuring endpoint security are critical. While the platform supports important security operations, users seek improved policy setup processes and additional features like vulnerability management and device blocking.

TrendAI

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Knutson Construction

Siemens

Malwarebytes Teams vs. Trend Micro ServerProtect [EOL]