Malwarebytes Teams vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Malwarebytes and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #22 with an average rating of 8.5, while VIPRE Security is ranked #57. Malwarebytes holds a 2.1% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Malwarebytes Teams

Read 37 Malwarebytes Teams reviews

4,202 Views
3,530 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Read 2 VIPRE Endpoint Security reviews

833 Views
683 Comparison Views

50% willing to recommend

Malwarebytes Teams

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 9, 2025

Malwarebytes Teams and VIPRE Endpoint Security compete in the endpoint protection category. VIPRE is seen as having the upper hand due to its more advanced features for enhanced security needs.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams provides robust malware protection, easy malware removal, and valued web protection. VIPRE Endpoint Security offers comprehensive threat intelligence, behavioral analysis, and advanced AI detection, providing more extensive threat detection and prevention.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams is known for its straightforward installation and responsive support, making it accessible for businesses with limited IT resources. VIPRE offers a scalable deployment model for larger enterprises with strong technical support for complex installations.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams presents an attractive setup cost with fast ROI, appealing to small to mid-sized businesses with budget constraints. VIPRE may involve a higher initial investment, but its advanced features and comprehensive protection justify the cost for long-term security solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,160 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Malwarebytes Teams

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

22nd

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

VIPRE Endpoint Security

Ranking in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

57th

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 2.1%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Malwarebytes Teams	2.1%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.5%
Other	97.4%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

Davina Becker

Senior Content Strategist at PeerSpot

Provides protection against malware but needs improved billing transparency

I can only speak to it on a personal level. If someone is considering it, they should test it on their own systems. I can't personally recommend it because each person has their own needs. While it may work for me as a malware antivirus solution, I can't recommend it to someone else who may have a different system or use case. I rate the overall solution 7.5 out of 10. Malwarebytes protects me against malware. If they fix the pricing model so it's not automatically charging me, the rating could improve. Until then, I can't give it an 8.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The installation process is very easy, especially since it is on the cloud."

"The platform is straightforward to install."

"It's very versatile and thorough."

"It is a stable solution."

"It allows us to have better knowledge of the way people use the tool and how we can improve their workflows."

"It is intuitive and easy to use. For the most part, it does a good job of catching things. It is good at stopping stuff. I did a couple of tests with a password cracker. I tried to load that on, and Malwarebytes didn't let me do that, which was pretty good. It has a rollback feature that I haven't seen with any other company. If one of your endpoints are hit with mass ransomware, you could actually roll it back. I watched a demo of them do that, and it was pretty sweet."

"Malwarebytes is a comprehensive solution for keeping endpoints safe and secure from intruders, viruses, malware and so on."

"We don't have to spend any time remediating bad things happening: Not viruses nor ransomware."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

Cons

"Malwarebytes is not there in the reports from Gartner or IDC...If we look at the market trends and the industry, most customers look at Gartner's reports to identify whether a product is a leader, challenger, or a big product, depending on which they choose."

"If they want to compete with bigger players, they should consider adding items like threat detection and website warnings."

"They should make it faster, less taxing on the processor."

"It's not good in search hunting."

"They could come up with better reporting capabilities."

"Malwarebytes should improve its mobile compatibility."

"They can include advanced scanning and improve reporting. I scan malware on the pen drive. Some more reports need to be added for that. It should also provide better protection because we have a new version of the malware."

"The product has major problems in almost every facet of setup and use including setup, configuration, lack of functionality, lack of stability, false positives, questionable reporting, inability to protect from randsomeware and poor technical support and development."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is expensive."

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"The cost may be something in the ballpark of $20-25 a year per computer."

"The price of Malwarebytes is in the middle range compared to other vendors."

"It is really expensive. We've got between 30 and 40 licenses every year, and for the number of licenses that we have, we're finding that Malwarebytes on average costs between $900 and $1,000 more per year than comparable options. We're paying about $3,300 per year for these licenses. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Its cost is around $60 a machine. The cost of the total solution for 250 people is about $8,500 a year. If we add EDR to it, it will bring that cost up to about $15,000. The cost for Carbon Black is about $25,000, which is $10,000 more, but you get all AI functions with it."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

10%

University

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

Comms Service Provider

13%

Computer Software Company

11%

University

10%

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Malwarebytes?

Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at least confirm with me, like a month before they bill me.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 11% of the time

ESET Endpoint Protection Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

HP Wolf Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Complete vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 4% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Huntress Managed EDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 14% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Bitdefender Total Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Fortinet FortiEDR vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 10% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 5% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

January 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

January 2026

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

No data available

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

Malwarebytes Teams provides advanced threat protection and efficient detection and removal capabilities, featuring cloud-based management and robust endpoint security. It operates on Windows and Mac, emphasizing threat interception and the cloud-management interface.

Offering comprehensive protection, Malwarebytes Teams is recognized for its customizable and user-friendly interface. The anti-exploit feature effectively intercepts threats in Office applications, while frequent updates maintain security standards. Efficient scanning, threat response, and rollback features are highly valued, as is its ability to integrate seamlessly into diverse environments. Remote accessibility and cloud management enhance its robust endpoint protection.

What are the key features of Malwarebytes Teams?

Comprehensive Threat Protection: Advanced detection and removal for malware.
Cloud-Based Management: Manage security conveniently from the cloud.
Anti-Exploit Feature: Protects against threats in Office applications.
Efficient Scanning: Quick and effective threat detection.
Threat Response and Rollback: Swift response with rollback capabilities.

What benefits and ROI should users look for?

Enhanced Security: Continuous updates and strong endpoint protection.
Integration Flexibility: Works well with existing environments.
Reporting Capabilities: Offers effective reporting and monitoring.
Remote Accessibility: Manage security from any location.

Malwarebytes Teams is widely implemented in cybersecurity across industries for endpoint security. Organizations deploy it for malware detection, intrusion protection, and compliance scanning, relying on its antivirus capabilities and ransomware rollback. It serves as a secondary tool alongside primary systems to enhance security on both Windows and Mac environments, particularly valued for monitoring usage behaviors without controlling endpoints.

Malwarebytes

VIPRE Endpoint Security provides fast, powerful and easy-to-manage endpoint protection for businesses of all sizes, with a small footprint that won't slow you down.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

Knutson Construction

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

February 2026

Free Report: Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,160 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.