Malwarebytes Teams vs VIPRE Endpoint Security comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Malwarebytes and VIPRE Security are both solutions in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category. Malwarebytes is ranked #24 with an average rating of 8.5, while VIPRE Security is ranked #51. Malwarebytes holds a 1.5% mindshare in EPP, compared to VIPRE Security’s 0.8% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Malwarebytes users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 50% of VIPRE Security users who would recommend it.

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 15, 2026

Malwarebytes Teams and VIPRE Endpoint Security compete in the cybersecurity space focusing on threat detection and prevention. VIPRE Endpoint Security often has the upper hand with its advanced features and threat detection capabilities despite potentially higher costs.

Features: Malwarebytes Teams provides strong malware protection, an intuitive management system, and quick threat scans. VIPRE Endpoint Security offers advanced threat intelligence, behavior analysis, and comprehensive security measures for complex environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Malwarebytes Teams is easy to deploy and has responsive customer support, suiting businesses needing efficient setups. VIPRE Endpoint Security offers good customer support but has a steeper learning curve due to its advanced features, likely requiring more technical expertise.

Pricing and ROI: Malwarebytes Teams offers a cost-effective solution with a low setup cost, ideal for quick ROI. VIPRE Endpoint Security, with higher costs, delivers substantial ROI through its enhanced security features, preferred by organizations prioritizing security over cost.

To learn more, read our detailed Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security Report (Updated: November 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

November 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 921,148 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Net...

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2026, in the Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) category, the mindshare of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is 3.8%, up from 3.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Malwarebytes Teams is 1.5%, down from 2.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of VIPRE Endpoint Security is 0.8%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks	3.8%
Malwarebytes Teams	1.5%
VIPRE Endpoint Security	0.8%
Other	93.9%

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

Featured Reviews

ABHISHEK_SINGH

Senior Process Expert at A.P. Moller - Maersk

Gained full visibility and streamlined threat detection through behavior-based insights and AI integration

Initially, we got to have a lot of false positives when we onboarded, but nowadays it's quite smooth. We have fine-tuned our security policies and allowed different levels of policies to get rid of those false positives. Currently, we are getting a fairly good amount of incidents that are not false positives or benign, but actionable items. The process is streamlined. In the initial days, the operations used to get involved in a lot of benign and other activities, but now the process is streamlined. We are leveraging the auto-detection and remediation plans. The operations teams are now more involved in other business roles as well, not just looking into the logs and fetching out what's happening there. They have fixed a lot of things. Initially, they didn't have IAC code drift detection, cloud posture management, or security posture management, but they have those now. They purchased different vendors and did a merger with that. They have now Prisma Cloud that gets integrated and now they are working with Cortex Cloud. Everything that was negative has now been addressed, and the product altogether looks to be in a very better and mature shape now. Currently, it's more or less detecting the workloads with AI-based best practices. Since most organizations are consuming AI agents and other things, we are looking forward to seeing what other feature enhancements Palo Alto can support in that.

Read full review

reviewer2594097

Chief Executive Officer at a wholesaler/distributor with 11-50 employees

Exceptional malware protection with regular updates and behavior-based detection

There are no built-in backups or integrated backup options, which could be an opportunity. The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it. Other customers have mentioned issues with false positives. It lacks enterprise-level management and more enterprise functionality. CrowdStrike and SentinelOne are much more enterprise-grade solutions. Malwarebytes has limited integration with cybersecurity tools and lacks enterprise integrations because it is not an enterprise product.

Read full review

Shawn S

IT Security Analyst at a healthcare company with 11-50 employees

Easy to upgrade and manage but needs better reporting

There just was a lot about it that I didn't like. For blocking certain items, such as USBs, we felt like it was slowing down the network too much. Therefore we utilized a GPO for blocking things like that instead. Our environment was big and I didn't feel like the console did a good enough job. We outgrew the product. I've been asking for a change for a couple of years now, and it finally got approved. In terms of the console, I had over 2000 endpoints in there and there wasn't even a search feature for me to look through them. If I had to find where a policy was I had to sort in alphabetical order to find an endpoint that I wanted. They need to offer a search function within the console - maybe something that shows a "last connected" notice. That way, it's easier to manage obsolete machines that you don't need anymore. They had a very vague setting, like after so many days, when do you want us to remove these, you'd see them. I just wish the console was a little more responsive when I would do commands. The reports could have been better. The product would show a lot of endpoints as not communicating. That was another pain point. We constantly had to run an SQL query to clean up the database as I would know immediately when I was in the console, that it just wasn't being responsive. I could tell I was being given bad data and that we had to clean up the database. As soon as I would clean up that database, it was like a purging of the SQL database and it would become a lot more responsive. The problem was that our environment was too big. We're going through a growth spurt right now. In the end, the solution is small and much better suited for a small business. We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for. The product is based on an older model of signature files. It doesn't use any artificial intelligence or anything. It was slow to refresh the policies and computer scans. The larger we got, the more it became an issue. If a company stayed small, I'm not sure if they would have noticed.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Cortex is the best tool for endpoint detection, and I have used it to verify hashes or domains to identify malicious activity, trigger playbooks that automate and gather endpoint logs, block malicious processes, and update incident tickets, showcasing end-to-end processes with automation in investigation and reducing the analysis workflow."

"The behavior-based detection feature is valuable."

"The solution doesn't need a high level of technical training."

"The initial setup is easy."

"It's a perfect solution. It integrates well into the environment."

"The anti-exploit is impenetrable."

"The policy configuration is great, the granularity of policies that are available is very helpful, it is straightforward to set up, and it has pretty much everything we need and works well within the Palo Alto ecosystem."

"The user interface of the solution is sophisticated and straightforward."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pros

"Ten times a day, improved signatures will be downloaded, so it is very up-to-date in terms of malware experience."

"So far, the solution has done a good job of protecting us from malicious items, such as ransomware, among other things."

"The central management of devices from different sites is a very good feature; this has made them much easier to manage."

"The solution has a good management interface."

"The product keeps our company safe."

"We have seen a decrease of approximately ninety percent in the number of events."

"The protection is really good with Malwarebytes. It's also user friendly and quite easy to set up."

"We have a small IT team, and being able to manage even a small fleet of devices that are out in the field and being able to respond and remediate really quickly from the cloud-based console has been really helpful for us."

More Malwarebytes Teams pros

"In general, it was pretty easy to manage."

"It has improved the way our organization functions, made things run faster in our company, and has done a fantastic job of keeping our networks free of virus."

"It has low overhead as far as machine resources are concerned. Everything runs faster with VIPRE installed versus some of the competitors. It has also been pretty easy to use. It just runs and gives us reports. It also sends us alerts when there is something that we need to look at. It does its job, and you just look at the reports. In other ways, you just forget that it is there."

"Technical support was always very helpful and responsive."

Cons

"The solution lags to the real-time scenarios here and there."

"It is a complex solution to implement."

"They are charging for Network Traffic Analyzer (NTA) services, so if the per GB data could be provided at a certain level free of cost or at the same cost which the customer is taking for the entire bundle, that would be better."

"There are some default policies which sometimes affect our applications and cause them to run around. In the hotel industry, we use a different type of data versus Oracle and SQL. By default, there are some policies which stop us from running properly. Because of this, the support level is also not that strong. We have to wait to get a results."

"In the next release, I would like to see more UI improvements. Their UI is a bit basic. When we are speaking about Palo Alto Networks they are the big company, so they can improve the UI a little bit. The UI, the reports, the log system can all be improved."

"When it comes to malware files, it should be a little quick because, at times, it would give a wrong result in the sense of what it might be on malware, even if it still might be a normal one."

"I have seen lagging with Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks. There was one time when we faced a threat actor trying to gain access to our system. When our team utilized the tool, we were all on the same dashboard and we faced a lag issue at that time of around five minutes, which was quite significant."

"I think sometimes Cortex XDR agent automatically stops event capturing from the device, and then even the dashboard does not get any notifications from the agent."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks cons

"I really hate the automatic rebuilding without even asking. It's just an annoyance that they should at least ask me, like a month before they bill me."

"Malwarebytes can improve its network database. Malwarebytes can scan the files and registry. It can scan the system with a light agent. It will not impact the performance of your PC. You can do the full scan and database scan using the EDR, and the RAM and CPU consumption will not increase."

"Malwarebytes is too simplistic. From a SOC IR perspective, it doesn't give you very much data around it. It doesn't tie things or provide SHA-1 and SHA-256 detection information, which makes it hard to do an additional investigation."

"The free version is effective, however, the paid version is pricey compared to it."

"The interface could be improved. Currently, you need to really dig around to find the elements you need."

"The EPP solution lacks the sophisticated artificial intelligence required for automating reports and letting you know about things in real-time. It stops a suspicious activity in real-time, but it doesn't let you know in real-time. You have to look at a report, and then you find out that something is wrong. You have to manually kick off a scan. With the Advanced EDR solutions, Malwarebytes has the ability to alert you in real-time, but they still don't do automatic remediation or quarantining of devices. That is something that you still have to do manually. So, the endpoint protection piece, which is just like their basic endpoint protection, lacks AI. For the advanced detection and response piece, there is an add-on that comes with it, but it still doesn't go far enough in terms of automatic remediation of viruses. It won't separate that virus from your network if something happens. You have to manually go there and do it."

"Overall, I haven't found any ways the solution lacks in features or usability."

"There hasn't been an ROI because we haven't had an event that would cause this software to do something. Therefore, at this point, it has just been a cost to us because we haven't gotten anything out of it."

More Malwarebytes Teams cons

"We would get a lot of false positives and instead of them fixing the false positive, they would just want us to put in an exception, which I didn't care for."

"Their management interface is a little buggy. It requires a few system resources on the management interface. Its reporting can also be better. Overall, the reports are pretty good. They patch some third-party software, but if they can expand what they do for reporting and patch enterprise software, it would be handy."

"Their management interface is a little buggy as it will hang up and crash from time to time."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is present, but when compared to other competitive products, I would say it is not less expensive; however, when all of the other added values are considered, the price is reasonable."

"This is an expensive solution."

"The solution is expensive. It's pricing is on a yearly-basis."

"I don't have any issues with the pricing. We are satisfied with the price."

"We pay about $50,000 USD per year for a bundle that includes Cortex XDR."

"I don't like that they have different types of licenses."

"The tool's price is moderate."

"The pricing seems fair, and I do like the licensing model. You use wherever they are, and it is elastic."

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks pricing and cost advice

"We expect to pay $1,000 USD a month, depending on the number of users."

"The licensing is per seat, with clients being a little less expensive than servers. If we need more licenses, we can accomplish that within a day. As Malwarebytes adds new features to their product, such as DNS filtering and a patching module, they want to charge us more even though we're a premium user, which isn't ideal."

"Malwarebytes is a cost-effective product."

"I rate the tool's pricing a five out of ten."

"I believe the retail price is between $40 and $50 per copy."

"The platform pricing is competitive with other antivirus products."

"Its licensing is annual. There are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fee."

"Yearly, it is around $50 per client."

More Malwarebytes Teams pricing and cost advice

"Its price point has been phenomenal. Our previous solution from Trend Micro was triple the cost of it."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Comms Service Provider

14%

Outsourcing Company

12%

Construction Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Comms Service Provider

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Construction Company

Manufacturing Company

Comms Service Provider

21%

Financial Services Firm

University

Wholesaler/Distributor

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	50
Midsize Enterprise	21
Large Enterprise	57

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	22
Midsize Enterprise	8
Large Enterprise	6

No data available

Questions from the Community

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. Sentinel One

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. SentinelOne SentinelOne offers very detailed specifics with regard to risks or attacks. ...

See all answers

Comparing CrowdStrike Falcon to Cortex XDR (Palo Alto)

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Both Cortex XDR and Crowd Strike Falcon offer cloud-based solutions th...

See all answers

How is Cortex XDR compared with Microsoft Defender?

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint is a cloud-delivered endpoint security solution. The tool reduces the attack surface,...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Malwarebytes?

I really hate the automatic rebilling without officially confirming it with me. It's an annoyance and they should at ...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Malwarebytes?

It takes up too much space when it's trying to run in the background.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Malwarebytes?

My primary use case is that it's protecting me against malware.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 16% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 5% of the time

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

Cortex XSIAM vs Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

Compared 3% of the time

More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Competitors

Symantec Endpoint Security vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 8% of the time

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 7% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 6% of the time

Check Point Harmony Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs Malwarebytes Teams

Compared 2% of the time

More Malwarebytes Teams Competitors

Trellix Endpoint Security Platform vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 14% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 12% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 8% of the time

Cisco Secure Endpoint vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

Symantec Endpoint Security vs VIPRE Endpoint Security

Compared 4% of the time

More VIPRE Endpoint Security Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks

November 2026

Download Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks product report

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams

October 2026

Download Malwarebytes Teams product report

Buyer's Guide

Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

October 2026

Download VIPRE Endpoint Security product report

Also Known As

Cyvera, Cortex XDR, Palo Alto Networks Traps

No data available

VIPRE Cloud, VIPRE Endpoint Security Cloud Edition, VIPRE Endpoint Security Server Edition

Overview

Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks provides advanced threat detection with AI-driven endpoint protection and seamless integration, ensuring multi-layered security and automatic threat response.

Cortex XDR is designed to safeguard endpoints against malware and suspicious activities. It offers advanced threat detection and response capabilities using behavioral analysis, AI, and machine learning. It seamlessly integrates with security infrastructures, providing endpoint security, firewall integration, and enhanced visibility in both cloud-based and on-premises environments.

What are the key features of Cortex XDR?

Advanced Threat Detection: Uses AI and machine learning for proactive threat identification.
Multi-layered Security: Combines various security measures for comprehensive protection.
Endpoint Protection: Safeguards against malware and exploits.
Behavioral Analysis: Monitors suspicious activity for early detection.
Automatic Threat Response: Automates responses to neutralize threats.

What benefits should users expect?

Ease of Use: Simplifies security management with intuitive design.
Resource Efficiency: Minimizes impact on system resources.
Integration Capabilities: Works well with existing security setups.
Reduced Analyst Workload: Automates processes to decrease manual intervention.

Organizations in diverse sectors deploy Cortex XDR to protect against malware, leveraging its advanced threat detection capabilities. Its integration with existing security infrastructures appeals to those seeking comprehensive protection in both cloud and on-premises environments, providing enhanced visibility and threat intelligence.

Palo Alto Networks

Malwarebytes Teams delivers top-tier protection with its user-friendly interface, strong endpoint security, and comprehensive threat detection.

Malwarebytes Teams offers exceptional malware detection and response capabilities, supported by strong endpoint protection and frequent updates. Its cloud management and flexible deployment options ensure comprehensive security without hindering user activities. Despite facing challenges like false positives and interface complexity, it excels in anti-ransomware features and behavior-based detection, making it a reliable choice for managing suspicious events and unauthorized access. The tool is particularly beneficial in cyber defense, providing real-time protection and blocking malicious files effectively.

What features define Malwarebytes Teams?

Endpoint Protection: Offers strong defense against threats at endpoint levels.
Scanning Capabilities: Provides thorough scanning for malware detection.
Remote Cloud Management: Enables managing security remotely through the cloud.
Anti-ransomware: Features robust protection against ransomware threats.
Behavior-based Detection: Utilizes behavior analysis for threat identification.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Security Maintenance: Ensures uncompromised security without disrupting activities.
Customer Support: Delivers efficient customer assistance for user issues.
Lightweight Performance: Operates without significant performance dips.
Comprehensive Visibility: Provides clear insights into security threats.

In specific industries, Malwarebytes Teams is leveraged for endpoint monitoring and malware prevention. It is favored in cybersecurity operations for automated remediation and compliance scanning, offering ease of use and background operation to ensure seamless protection of endpoints and server integrity.

Malwarebytes

VIPRE Endpoint Security offers advanced protection tailored for business environments focusing on threat detection, prevention, and management. It's designed to safeguard endpoints from malware and cyber threats, delivering powerful security tools for optimal defense.

With its robust technology, VIPRE Endpoint Security caters to enterprises needing comprehensive security, ensuring responsive threat mitigation and simplified management. Its scalable architecture allows efficient deployment across networks, supporting complex IT infrastructures. Enhanced threat intelligence and rapid incident response make it a trusted choice for modern security challenges.

What are the most important features of VIPRE Endpoint Security?

Advanced Threat Protection: Provides real-time monitoring to detect and neutralize threats.
Centralized Management: Streamlines security management across all endpoints from a single interface.
Automatic Updates: Ensures endpoints are always protected with the latest security patches.
Comprehensive Reporting: Offers detailed analysis and visibility into security status and incidents.

What benefits or ROI should users look for in reviews when evaluating VIPRE Endpoint Security?

Cost-Effectiveness: Provides robust security without significant financial investment.
Time Efficiency: Reduces the time spent on managing security tasks and incidents.
Scalability: Easily accommodates growth within the organization, adapting to increased demands.
Enhanced Security Posture: Strengthens defenses against emerging threats, ensuring data protection.

VIPRE Endpoint Security is valued in industries such as finance, healthcare, and manufacturing, where data protection is critical. Its proactive threat detection and compliance features meet the stringent security requirements in these sectors, providing peace of mind and regulatory adherence while optimizing operational continuity.

VIPRE Security

Sample Customers

CBI Health Group, University Honda, VakifBank

Knutson Construction

College Station ISD, Mid-West Companies, Guardian Network Solutions

Buyer's Guide

Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

November 2026

Free Report: Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security

Find out what your peers are saying about Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security and other solutions. Updated: November 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

921,148 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Malwarebytes Teams vs. VIPRE Endpoint Security report.

See our list of best Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) vendors.

We monitor all Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.