MEGA HOPEX vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

MEGA International and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Design category. MEGA International is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #5 with an average rating of 7.6. MEGA International holds a 3.1% mindshare in BPD, compared to SAP’s 8.8% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of MEGA International users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MEGA HOPEX

Read 40 MEGA HOPEX reviews

3,446 Views
1,761 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

6,654 Views
4,461 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

MEGA HOPEX

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 3, 2024

MEGA HOPEX and SAP Signavio Process Manager compete in the process management category. MEGA HOPEX has an advantage in enterprise architecture integration, while SAP Signavio offers superior collaboration and user-friendliness.

Features: MEGA HOPEX provides integrated architecture with IT portfolio management, aligning business and technology strategies for a comprehensive enterprise view. It supports generating application architecture from business processes and exporting them to the enterprise architecture module. SAP Signavio offers ease of use, collaborative process modeling, and comprehensive visualization capabilities, including user-friendly interfaces and intuitive modeling with drag-and-drop functionalities.

Room for Improvement: MEGA HOPEX needs improvements in reporting, analytics, and interface intuitiveness. Stability issues such as occasional freezes and better documentation are necessary. SAP Signavio requires enhancements in integration options and user interfaces, particularly for managing process variations. More customization options and AI-enhanced features are also desired.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: MEGA HOPEX is primarily deployed on-premises or through hybrid setups, offering substantial technical support with local assistance. However, reliance on professional services can be cumbersome. SAP Signavio is cloud-based, offering flexible deployment and strong support, though it sometimes requires professional services.

Pricing and ROI: MEGA HOPEX is expensive with a complex pricing model, yet it offers high ROI by easing enterprise architecture tasks. SAP Signavio is moderately priced with flexible enterprise licensing, providing good value for large user bases seeking scalable solutions.

To learn more, read our detailed MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,020 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

MEGA HOPEX

Ranking in Business Process Design

7th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (4th), GRC (4th)

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Design

5th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (8th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Design category, the mindshare of MEGA HOPEX is 3.1%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 8.8%, up from 8.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Design

Featured Reviews

Navi Thejesh

Mega Hopex Functional and Technical Senior Consultan at CapgeminiConsulting

Interactive with good functionality and helps with productivity

The latest version is HOPEX WiFi. HOPEX can be on the cloud and accessed from anywhere within the given access network area. It is very interactive. We can do things from anywhere, and all the applications will work as specified. We can generate documents and can publish the documents. We can create a data match and visualize graphs and everything. Everything can be generated from the web interface itself. It has good functionality. We can develop our own customizations and meta models to define requirements, in-house business functions, and requirements. MEGA is already defined by global standards. A company can adapt to global standards and work in such a way to design its own methodology to define its structure. The interface is very good.

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"You do not need to be a professional of enterprise modeling to contribute to the enrichment and improvement of the enterprise repository."

"The support experience in Latin America is great."

"Every module sets up the same information in a unique repository."

"It generates friendly websites and presents specific views of the enterprise (business, functional, applicative, technological, and infrastructure)."

"The most valuable parts of this solution are the richness of its features and its easy interface."

"The ability to customize is valuable."

"The initial setup was straightforward. With configuration, customizing or prepping the data and deployment, it took about one year to set up. We only needed two people to deploy and maintain the solution: one business architect and someone who specializes in customization and operations."

"The most valuable feature of MEGA HOPEX is the publication method for static websites. You can generate the whole database into a static website. Additionally, in the new tabular entry, you don't have to put objects or links, you can go and fill a tab and the MEGA HOPEX will generate an object for you in a simple way."

More MEGA HOPEX pros

"All in all, Signavio usability is excellent. Anyone can learn to use the tool quickly. This increases acceptance as employees are not facing a high learning curve. With the offered usability it is easy to model processes also live in workshops."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

"It is highly user-friendly and easy to use, even for those who are not familiar with product modeling."

"This product has helped us to work within standards for process planning."

"The most valuable feature is the glossary. It is really nice because all of the information is centralized, and that is a big help to the company."

"The collaboration hub, which helps us in terms of being able to communicate with our customers, brings everybody into the tool and close to the process, allowing them to comment and to implement their own processes."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"This solution is innovative and simple to use."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"Scalability can be a problem sometimes."

"Standardization is lacking. The Operational Risk Function will be more effective if it at a default level follows established Basel standards for Loss categorization, Risk Assessments, Risk Event categorization, etc."

"In my experience, I've encountered difficulties with consuming custom packages in MEGA HOPEX, which leads to redundant work when deploying them to production. This is an area where improvement is needed. While version six offers better UI and UX, resolving this issue should be a priority. I believe it's important to fully explore MEGA HOPEX's capabilities before suggesting new ones."

"An area for improvement in MEGA HOPEX is its vast learning curve. The tool is also heavy, so that's a pain point. MEGA HOPEX is also tricky to use if you don't train for many hours."

"The features are limited. I'm hoping in the future the solution will be bigger and include more items. Right now, overall, it needs more."

"I cannot recall coming across any missing features."

"Lacking more out of the box integrations."

"The tool usability is weak and it also has a high learning curve."

More MEGA HOPEX cons

"There are some small graphical bugs, but they are addressed immediately by Signavio to their product development team."

"Two executives cannot work on one modeling process simultaneously."

"For us, it would help a lot if this solution had floating licenses."

"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."

"From what I have experienced when I worked with a process team, we would like to work with dummy process diagrams. Right now, I don't know if I would set up a process as a dummy, since it very often gets mixed up with diagrams in production. There are many process diagrams linked to the production environment. I would like to have some kind of sandbox to work with. That would be very good. I don't even know if they already have it, but I would certainly like that."

"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."

"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."

"Signavio already offers a wonderful range of functions. If variant management and customer journeys are optimized, Signavio can definitely bask in the glory of BPM tools. We also see optimization potential in the management of licenses, e.g. no named users but rather floating licenses and integration into the company's active directory."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The product is reasonably priced for the value it offers. There's a good balance between cost and features."

"If you want to use additional features, such as the Risk Management capability, then it is a little too expensive."

"I've been told that MEGA HOPEX is very expensive, which is why small organizations dismiss the tool. It's complex and costly versus other simpler and cheaper solutions."

"The price of the support depends on the vendors that are reselling this module or the MEGA HOPEX version 5. We are on premium support and are their only partners in the GCC, we have a premium support contract with them. The support we have is not with the client. The client does not bear the cost, it's us who bear the cost."

"The product has a high cost."

"It is very expensive."

"The pricing depends on the number of licenses purchased."

"The tool is relatively expensive."

More MEGA HOPEX pricing and cost advice

"The product is expensive."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"The solution is expensive."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"We are using the free trial version."

"The customer Journey Modeler is more than twice the price of Process Manager, which is a lot."

"Lower than the competition with highly flexible licensing plans."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Design solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Educational Organization

44%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Computer Software Company

Government

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Any experience with Strategic Project Portfolio Management Solutions?

Hi @Cheryl Joseph Looking at the crossover between Project and Portfolio management with EA, then Planview could be a good choice. If looking at Portfolio Management from an EA perspective then Le...

See all answers

What do you like most about MEGA HOPEX?

The platform is stable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MEGA HOPEX?

MEGA HOPEX is perceived as somewhat expensive.

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

LeanIX vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 17% of the time

Sparx Systems Enterprise Architect vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 17% of the time

ARIS BPA vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 11% of the time

Avolution ABACUS vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 5% of the time

Visio vs MEGA HOPEX

Compared 4% of the time

More MEGA HOPEX Competitors

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 23% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MEGA HOPEX

December 2024

Download MEGA HOPEX product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

December 2024

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

No data available

Signavio Process Editor

Learn More

MEGA International

Video not available

SAP

Overview

MEGA HOPEX is a single software platform that combines integrated software solutions including privacy and data management, business process analysis, and risk management. By connecting business, IT, data, and risk perspectives, MEGA HOPEX helps your organization get the visibility you need and also helps improve decision-making by using connected EA to eliminate silos and foster collaboration. As a SaaS solution, MEGA HOPEX is scalable, flexible, and secure. It relies on Microsoft Azure infrastructure and is designed to seamlessly and easily integrate into your digital ecosystem. The MEGA HOPEX platform enables you to develop an integrated approach to risk management, business optimization, and data governance, as well as to build a clear IT roadmap.

MEGA HOPEX Features

MEGA HOPEX has many valuable key features. Some of the most useful ones include:

Flexible metamodel configurability: MEGA HOPEX can be adapted to your operating model with easy-to-use customization options. In addition, it gives you the option to expand functionalities and import ready-to-use content through the HOPEX store.

Intuitive workflows: The MEGA HOPEX platform includes intuitive workflows that help accelerate business value delivery and also helps to foster collaboration among all stakeholders.

Ready-to-use enterprise portal: With MEGA HOPEX’s ready-to-use enterprise portal, it is easy to share insights across your entire organization.

Contextual search: MEGA HOPEX has a contextual search functionality that enables you to find accurate and trusted data easily with the option to also use filters to narrow your search results.

Reporting and dashboarding: MEGA HOPEX offers out-of-the-box templates for reports and also allows you to build your own reports to monitor and govern your projects with actionable insights and recommendations.

MEGA HOPEX Benefits

There are many benefits to implementing MEGA HOPEX. Some of the biggest advantages the solution offers include:

Data-driven algorithms: MEGA HOPEX provides smart recommendations based on data-driven algorithms, giving you the ability to share actionable insights using a collaborative enterprise portal and mobile apps.

Intuitive modeling engine: The MEGA HOPEX platform enables you to visually communicate how your operations work and see how business, IT, and data are connected through building different diagrams.

Improved collaboration and alignment: MEGA HOPEX has a data discovery tool that extracts data from various sources to build your data catalogs. The platform’s automated discovery of applications, data, and processes, along with its automated diagram generation and intelligent workflows, improve productivity, collaboration, and alignment.

Accelerates project delivery: By using MEGA HOPEX, you can develop synergies and avoid duplicative efforts by connecting strategy, business, IT, data, and risk perspectives on the same platform.

Reviews from Real Users

Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by PeerSpot users currently using the MEGA HOPEX solution.

PeerSpot user Kayode A., Enterprise Architecture Consultant at ZealHosts Consulting, says, “What I find the most valuable is the process workflow. It is really good. The fact that you can decompose is also valuable, as is the file D structure. Also, the fact that you can have your own logical repository structure and you can drag and drop is very valuable. This is largely because of its intuitiveness. Once you understand the logic behind the tool, MEGA HOPEX is quite intuitive. I also like the ability to create custom reports. I like the fact that you can share repository content via web to other end users who are not architects.”

A Software Architect at a transportation company mentions, “The main feature that we like the most is the ability to have a unique repository where all the architects can interact and play together with the shapes of different architecture solutions. They have a unified repository where users can share the developments they're working on. Its availability is very good.”

An IT Consulting Manager at a tech services company comments, "We have many use cases for this solution but the feature I have found most valuable is the IT Portfolio Management module."

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

Sample Customers

Aetna, Fannie Mae, M&T Bank, Glatfelter Insurance Group, Zions Management Services Company, The College Board, Baxter Credit Union, AXA Financial, Missouri Department of Conservation, New York State OTDA, MEG Energy Corp, Walgreens, Procter & Gamble, Biogen Idec, Gilead Sciences, Organic Valley, Trinity Health, Nissan and Ford

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Free Report: MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MEGA HOPEX vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Design vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Design reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.