OpenText ALM/Quality Center and Microsoft Azure DevOps compete in the application lifecycle management and DevOps categories. Azure DevOps is better suited for those seeking a more agile, cloud-based solution due to its comprehensive DevOps integration capabilities.
Features: OpenText ALM/Quality Center excels in test and defect management offering traceability features, customizable reporting, and integration with automation tools. It is particularly effective for larger organizations favoring a traditional waterfall model. Microsoft Azure DevOps provides integrated solutions for DevOps pipelines and CI/CD, as well as agile project management, with seamless integration into Microsoft’s suite of tools.
Room for Improvement: Users suggest OpenText ALM requires a more user-friendly interface, better integration with modern tools, and cost-effective licensing. Microsoft Azure DevOps could improve in its reporting, third-party integrations, flexibility in pricing models, and enhancements for non-functional testing capabilities.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText ALM is primarily deployed on-premises with limited cloud flexibility and average customer service responses. Microsoft Azure DevOps facilitates agile deployment setups with extensive cloud support. While its customer service generally receives positive feedback, it varies in response time and product knowledge.
Pricing and ROI: OpenText ALM is considered expensive and better suited for larger enterprises due to its comprehensive feature set. Microsoft Azure DevOps is perceived as more cost-effective, especially for mid-sized enterprises leveraging the Microsoft ecosystem, offering flexible, per-user pricing tiers and showing a favorable ROI for its cloud-native capabilities.
On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the best, I would say ROI is an eight.
It acts as an enabler for effective test and program management.
Resolving issues took time since understanding our unique problems was not always straightforward for support teams.
Technical support has been excellent.
Quality is always high yet not perfect.
The scalability has left me pleased, not just for our teams in Europe, the Middle East, and Asia, but as we expanded into North America, Africa, and even Australia.
OpenText ALM Quality Center is definitely scalable.
The solution is stable, and we did not encounter any stability issues.
From a stability standpoint, OpenText ALM Quality Center has been pretty good.
Those processes are a bit difficult for some customers who may not have technical knowledge and don't go through the entire documentation.
Enhanced system guidance highlighting best practices would be beneficial, especially if experienced personnel are not available for support.
Improvements are needed so that the system can continue running without creating a new run.
I see a stable tool that remains relevant in the market.
HPLM has one of the best UIs compared to other test management tools, allowing for efficient navigation between test pieces, test folders, test suites, and test execution.
They don't even provide a POC where you can have a sandbox or stuff that you can go through and see how exactly it's costing.
I find it to be expensive.
It would be cheaper to use a cloud model with a pay-per-use licensing model.
I can't approve my own request and move the code around without a review.
Our company organized a training session with a certified Azure expert, which was extremely beneficial for adopting best practices during the initial three months.
The integration with internal applications and CollabNet is made possible through exposed APIs, allowing necessary integrations.
It creates constant visibility into the test process, showing the status, bugs, and automated test results.
We can create a requirement for stability metrics with the test cases to ensure all requirements are covered.
Microsoft Azure DevOps is a cloud service that enables developers to collaborate on code development projects and create and deploy applications quicker than ever before. The service helps unite developers, project managers, and software development experts through a collaborative experience while using the application. For the users' convenience, Azure DevOps offers the user cloud services through Azure DevOps Services or an on-premises service using Azure DevOps Server. In addition, it supports integration with additional services and adding extensions, including the ability for the user to create their own custom extensions.
Azure DevOps provides a variety of unified features that can be accessed through their web browser or IDE client, such as:
Benefits of Microsoft Azure DevOps
Microsoft Azure DevOps offers many benefits, including:
Reviews from Real Users
Microsoft Azure DevOps stands out among its competitors for a variety of reasons. Two major ones are its ability to forecast how long each task will take and the ability for users to follow the entire development process.
PeerSpot viewers note the effectiveness of this solution. An executive chief operating officer for a cloud provider notes, “We can forecast tasks and the number of hours a task will take and can compare it with how long a task actually takes.”
Carlos H., a product and system director at SPCM, writes, “I think the most usable thing is that you can follow the whole progress of the development process. This makes it very useful for us.”
We monitor all Application Lifecycle Management (ALM) Suites reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.