Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.3, while IBM is ranked #17 with an average rating of 8.5. Microsoft holds a 15.2% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 1.0% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 323 Microsoft Azure reviews

19,268 Views
11,175 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

648 Views
648 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are significant players in cloud hosting and management. Microsoft Azure offers a cost-effective advantage with strong support, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud makes a compelling case for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with Microsoft services, extensive global reach, and exceptional security infrastructure. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides enterprise-grade Kubernetes, superior container orchestration, and built-in CI/CD for efficient application development.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its platform by simplifying its complex pricing model, improving real-time support response, and offering more comprehensive automation tools. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud might benefit from lowering its high entry costs, broadening its ecosystem to include more third-party integrations, and improving its user interface for easier management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud emphasizes an easy deployment process and robust customer service tailored for enterprise-scale deployments. Microsoft Azure provides rich tools and documentation, easing deployment for those familiar with Microsoft's ecosystem while focusing more on self-service resources.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure is known for competitive pricing structured for existing Microsoft customers, offering favorable ROI options. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud demands a higher initial investment but promises greater returns for organizations that leverage its high-end features in complex scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: February 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

February 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 882,594 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

323

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

17th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 15.2%, down from 20.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 1.0%, up from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Market Share Distribution
Product	Market Share (%)
Microsoft Azure	15.2%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	1.0%
Other	83.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"We have implemented the ExpressRoute connection, which is an established circuit between the local provider and the Microsoft network edge."

"It's a great solution. It's so customizable. Every user can create dashboards to suit their needs. We can create and share them with our teammates easily, too."

"It is stable and scalable."

"Microsoft Azure is flexible and the performance is great."

"One of the features I have found to be valuable is the scale set feature."

"The main benefit of Microsoft Azure is that it is cloud-based. We are using Microsoft Visual Studio for our code and it is tightly integrated with Microsoft Azure. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."

"The automated connectors to some of our critical enterprise systems are an important feature. These are very large, critical, global HCM systems."

"The best feature is it's easy to integrate with other Microsoft solutions."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"Ideally, Microsoft Azure should be compatible with the applications that we are using in my environment."

"I haven't checked the console for some time, however, compared to the AWS console, the interaction console of the web part, the web services, it's not so easy."

"Azure installation is complicated. When we first deployed Azure, it was challenging."

"Monitoring options should be more sophisticated, as there are dashboards on which a end user is able to pin a lot of charts and a number of web parts, but for example, I would love to have some option like in Operational Management Suite."

"The solution should improve the shared cache. For the shared cache, Microsoft uses RADIUS third-party services. We have a lot of trouble with RADIUS and I suppose that is due to the fact that is not owned completely by Microsoft."

"The cost of the product is too high. It would be ideal if they could lower it a bit for their customers."

"The interface for configuring the environment is not very intuitive. Certain things are at different places, and it is not easy to navigate. They should have a more transparent licensing model. Currently, Microsoft's licensing is a bit clunky, and it keeps changing depending on the type of subscription you have. Different features are included, and sometimes, it is very hard to figure out the right licensing. So, the commercial aspect of the licensing can be improved, and they can make it easier to understand all the features that are included."

"At this point, the latency is too high to use Azure in our production environment."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The cost-benefit equation for Azure is very good, particularly for small applications. However, Microsoft should do much, much more to improve how costs are communicated and how to forecast them. The Azure Pricing Calculator is not useful."

"Customers pay for our software and use our solution as a service through monthly payments. They don't pay the licensing fee directly to Microsoft."

"The price of the solution is reasonable."

"I would like to see it more easily accessible."

"The cost could definitely be lower."

"Azure is cheaper than solutions from other cloud vendors like AWS or Google."

"The pricing is very competitive."

"It is similar to AWS, where it is on-demand and is billed monthly."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	140
Midsize Enterprise	53
Large Enterprise	150

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What do you like most about Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensu...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

Comparisons

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 9% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 24% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 19% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 18% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

February 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

February 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure integrates services and offers flexibility, ensuring compatibility with diverse environments. Its scalability, security, and cost-efficient features enhance deployment and management, making it ideal for infrastructure services and application hosting.

Azure provides a comprehensive suite of tools for application deployment, virtual machine management, and data analytics. It allows seamless integration with Power BI and offers a user-friendly interface supported by detailed documentation and technical support. Though users appreciate its capabilities, they sometimes face challenges with costs, setup, and interface complexity, alongside integration and performance issues. Frequent updates and a learning curve are also noted, though Azure's cloud-based security and scalability remain critical for disaster recovery and business continuity.

What are Azure's key features?

Integrated Services: Ensures compatibility with Microsoft and non-Microsoft environments.
Scalability: Supports growing business demands with flexible computing power.
Security: Offers robust cloud-based security features for data protection.
Cost Efficiency: Provides options that optimize costs for diverse requirements.
Application Deployment: Facilitates quick rollout of apps and services.

What benefits should users expect from Azure?

Operational Optimization: Allows companies to streamline processes effectively.
Innovative Efficiency: Empowers businesses to innovate with powerful tools.
Reliable Support: Backed by strong technical support and comprehensive documentation.
Flexible Cloud Solutions: Offers a range of options for cloud migrations and infrastructure management.

Microsoft Azure is widely implemented in industries like financial services, healthcare, and logistics for hosting enterprise applications and vital services. Companies utilize its capabilities for IoT applications, DevOps, and Kubernetes clusters, benefiting from its cloud migrations, data analytics, and active directory support.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud™ is a fully managed OpenShift service that leverages the enterprise scale and security of IBM Cloud, so you can focus on developing and managing your applications.

Deploy highly available, OpenShift clusters as-a-service with the click of a button on IBM Cloud. Move and build OpenShift-based workloads on a managed public cloud service to gain increased responsiveness, scalability, and reliability.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

February 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: February 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

882,594 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.