Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Download the complete report

Helped 892,383 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

323

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 13.5%, down from 20.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 1.2%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	13.5%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	1.2%
Other	85.3%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The user interface is very good for administrators."

"Being able to set up, change and configure VMs is easy - a lot easier than in AWS."

"The solution reduces work for our IT teams, they don't have to keep things up to date, and we can concentrate on our mission, with help from Microsoft to migrate applications to the latest release and support efforts, which saves us a lot of time."

"The Azure Portal has an advantage in terms of UX making buying resources or downgrading really easier to understand, and while AWS has micro, smaller functionalities, Azure has more end-to-end focus which makes it easier, saving you time and money."

"It has good support for various platforms like Java, Ruby, and PHP for websites."

"It is quick and easy to deploy. It is flexible, and we can deploy a resource anytime. We like and prefer the pay-as-you-go model."

"Microsoft has a lot of partners in this area, and they have a lot of information available online, so it's easy to get support."

"Depending on the project requirements, I would recommend using Azure."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The stability of the solution is good."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"The initial setup is easy."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"The design could be a little bit better, the technical support could be better, and the price could be even cheaper."

"Predictability and quality need improvement. Make sure things work predictably, as expected, and are documented."

"The free support is bad, but the paid versions have better support, i.e., more you pay, the better the support."

"It's possible that the performance could be improved, but it's not a big issue."

"The installation process is not very straightforward."

"The biggest area needing improvement involves the licensing cost."

"Any time you use a cloud service, there are increased security risks."

"It would be helpful if it offered more integration with other platforms."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had."

"The performance could be better; it's a bit slow right now."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed firewall."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

"Technical support could be a bit better."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It’s necessary to use third party products or to use good self-management economic tools"

"It is not cheap. Its price could be a little bit less."

"I pay for a yearly subscription."

"This is an expensive product."

"Monthly billing convenience reduced cost overheads up to 70 percent."

"The pricing is cheap."

"Some services are okay, while others are expensive. Different features within the same service, like Defender, have separate charges. This, combined with the skill shortage in FinOps strategy and management, makes it difficult to control costs."

"The pricing model can be improved because we find that Azure pricing is a bit high."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

892,383 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	149

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

What is your primary use case for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

If you want to control a more secure environment, like an on-premises environment, I use OpenShift on IBM Financial Services Cloud but not on the public cloud.

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Comparisons

Compared 8% of the time

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 17% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 16% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Microsoft Azure

Download Microsoft Azure product report

PaaS Clouds

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is known for its efficient transaction processing, robust Kubernetes orchestration, and seamless portability. It enhances application management and provides a versatile GUI for accessing resources on any cloud, aiding developers with a stable setup across platforms.

This offering supports continuous integration and deployment pipelines, integrating security checks with Fortify. The intuitive console allows for direct resource access, streamlining application management. Suitable for deploying workloads on public or private clouds, it handles middleware telecom transactions, digital application APIs, and manages microservices effectively. While appreciated for easy setup and stable performance, areas like autoscaling, performance, and pricing require enhancements for improved user experience.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Kubernetes Orchestration: Efficiently manages Kubernetes applications across clusters.
Autoscaling: Dynamically adjusts resources based on demand.
Security Integration: Supports Fortify for robust security checks.
CI/CD Pipelines: Facilitates automation in deployment processes.
GUI Access: Provides a user-friendly interface for resource management.

What benefits can users expect from Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Seamless Portability: Easily migrate applications across cloud environments.
Enhanced Stability: Offers a stable environment for deploying workloads.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines management with advanced orchestration.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage for budget-friendly operations.

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is widely implemented in industries focusing on telecom and digital applications. Companies deploy microservices for secure, cloud-based environments, leveraging Kubernetes for managing services effectively. It enables advanced cluster management and supports deployment of customer services on both IBM and Microsoft platforms.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud