Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #19 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 12.9% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 324 Microsoft Azure reviews

25,540 Views
14,302 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

890 Views
890 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are significant players in cloud hosting and management. Microsoft Azure offers a cost-effective advantage with strong support, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud makes a compelling case for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with Microsoft services, extensive global reach, and exceptional security infrastructure. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides enterprise-grade Kubernetes, superior container orchestration, and built-in CI/CD for efficient application development.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its platform by simplifying its complex pricing model, improving real-time support response, and offering more comprehensive automation tools. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud might benefit from lowering its high entry costs, broadening its ecosystem to include more third-party integrations, and improving its user interface for easier management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud emphasizes an easy deployment process and robust customer service tailored for enterprise-scale deployments. Microsoft Azure provides rich tools and documentation, easing deployment for those familiar with Microsoft's ecosystem while focusing more on self-service resources.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure is known for competitive pricing structured for existing Microsoft customers, offering favorable ROI options. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud demands a higher initial investment but promises greater returns for organizations that leverage its high-end features in complex scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: April 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

April 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 896,034 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

324

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

19th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of May 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 12.9%, down from 19.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 1.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	12.9%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	1.3%
Other	85.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Syed Abid

Snr. Infrastructure Architect (Data Centre) at LogicEra

Versatile integrations and reliable customer satisfaction elevate cloud service experience

For Microsoft Azure improvement, they need to enhance their support system. The first level of support should be improved in terms of quality and response time. They need more technical support at the first level, as there are currently only one or two technical people among five to ten staff members at this level. They should ensure that the first level support is more technical because we normally provide services to technical users ourselves. When an issue arises, it usually escalates to the second or third level. When facing first level support, they may have limited knowledge and only collect screenshots to forward to their seniors. They should ensure that the first level support is aligned with L2 and L3 to better assist us, especially since we mention in the ticket that our issues are related to specific problems and require that sort of support.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Technical support has been good over the years."

"It's been pretty useful in terms of migration and disaster recovery strategy."

"Azure offers broad compatibility with both structured and unstructured data. For example, we use PostgreSQL for storing Azure's official data and manage various types of data, including tabular and image data, accommodating the storage of all data types we handle. So, in many ways, Azure simplified the data storage and management needs."

"AWS is good, but Azure's license is reasonably priced, and Microsoft is gaining market share with a competitive package overall."

"The design of Microsoft Azure is for it to be scalable and it is scalable."

"Databricks is really nice because you have the power to process lots of data and you can create queries and provide big analysis for the business using a robust cluster."

"It is a stable solution because it depends on the workload you expect. Based on that data, you can configure how many users it can handle."

"Microsoft Azure is easy to use."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"The initial setup is easy."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

"The stability of the solution is good."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"The solution could improve by being more user-friendly."

"Their backup strategy is a little complex which racks up the VM to other sole storage areas. This should be improved."

"The solution should emulate what MuleSoft is doing."

"They could do better in terms of the pricing model. Its price keeps on changing."

"The market place can be raised, and the CMT can be more sophisticated to create more opportunities for the end users."

"They should create integrations with more platforms."

"The solution is too expensive."

"The tool needs to improve its navigation."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"Technical support could be a bit better."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had."

"Many of the managed services are not accessible."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"It is similar to AWS, where it is on-demand and is billed monthly."

"It is important to consider ROI when looking at the cost of a subscription."

"Make use of Azure pricing calculator and you will find out that Azure Is still more reasonable that the competition and do your research, when unclear speak with your MS support."

"The pricing is fair and it was actually just reduced. My organization is paying approximately $100,000 annually with close to one thousand users. There are no additional fees."

"The solution does require a license."

"The cost could definitely be lower."

"I pay a yearly subscription fee for the solution."

"We pay our bill in a monthly or 6 monthly billing cycle. The cost depends on how much you use during the period."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

"The pricing is a little high in China."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Computer Software Company

University

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	153

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

If you want to control a more secure environment, like an on-premises environment, I use OpenShift on IBM Financial Services Cloud but not on the public cloud.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 8% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 7% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 15% of the time

VMware Tanzu Platform vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 10% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

May 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

April 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is known for its efficient transaction processing, robust Kubernetes orchestration, and seamless portability. It enhances application management and provides a versatile GUI for accessing resources on any cloud, aiding developers with a stable setup across platforms.

This offering supports continuous integration and deployment pipelines, integrating security checks with Fortify. The intuitive console allows for direct resource access, streamlining application management. Suitable for deploying workloads on public or private clouds, it handles middleware telecom transactions, digital application APIs, and manages microservices effectively. While appreciated for easy setup and stable performance, areas like autoscaling, performance, and pricing require enhancements for improved user experience.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Kubernetes Orchestration: Efficiently manages Kubernetes applications across clusters.
Autoscaling: Dynamically adjusts resources based on demand.
Security Integration: Supports Fortify for robust security checks.
CI/CD Pipelines: Facilitates automation in deployment processes.
GUI Access: Provides a user-friendly interface for resource management.

What benefits can users expect from Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Seamless Portability: Easily migrate applications across cloud environments.
Enhanced Stability: Offers a stable environment for deploying workloads.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines management with advanced orchestration.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage for budget-friendly operations.

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is widely implemented in industries focusing on telecom and digital applications. Companies deploy microservices for secure, cloud-based environments, leveraging Kubernetes for managing services effectively. It enables advanced cluster management and supports deployment of customer services on both IBM and Microsoft platforms.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

April 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: April 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

896,034 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.