Microsoft Azure vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Microsoft and IBM are both solutions in the PaaS Clouds category. Microsoft is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.5, while IBM is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.0. Microsoft holds a 12.0% mindshare in PSP, compared to IBM’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 95% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 85% of IBM users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Azure

Read 324 Microsoft Azure reviews

47,107 Views
24,967 Comparison Views

95% willing to recommend

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Read 8 Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud reviews

1,378 Views
1,378 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Microsoft Azure

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Microsoft Azure and Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud are significant players in cloud hosting and management. Microsoft Azure offers a cost-effective advantage with strong support, whereas Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud makes a compelling case for businesses prioritizing advanced capabilities despite its higher costs.

Features: Microsoft Azure offers seamless integration with Microsoft services, extensive global reach, and exceptional security infrastructure. On the other hand, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud provides enterprise-grade Kubernetes, superior container orchestration, and built-in CI/CD for efficient application development.

Room for Improvement: Microsoft Azure could enhance its platform by simplifying its complex pricing model, improving real-time support response, and offering more comprehensive automation tools. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud might benefit from lowering its high entry costs, broadening its ecosystem to include more third-party integrations, and improving its user interface for easier management.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud emphasizes an easy deployment process and robust customer service tailored for enterprise-scale deployments. Microsoft Azure provides rich tools and documentation, easing deployment for those familiar with Microsoft's ecosystem while focusing more on self-service resources.

Pricing and ROI: Microsoft Azure is known for competitive pricing structured for existing Microsoft customers, offering favorable ROI options. Conversely, Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud demands a higher initial investment but promises greater returns for organizations that leverage its high-end features in complex scenarios.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Report (Updated: September 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

September 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 912,753 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Azure

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

1st

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

324

Ranking in other categories

Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) (1st)

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Ranking in PaaS Clouds

18th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of September 2026, in the PaaS Clouds category, the mindshare of Microsoft Azure is 12.0%, down from 18.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is 1.2%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

PaaS Clouds Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Azure	12.0%
Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud	1.2%
Other	86.8%

PaaS Clouds

Featured Reviews

Sylvain CAILLAU

Technical Director / Market Evangelist at CAST Software

Effective public cloud deployment enhances operational flexibility with room for cost management improvement

I am not having enough experience to answer what the room for improvement is for Microsoft Azure, but maybe not only in the technical aspect. The design could be a little bit better, the technical support could be better, and the price could be even cheaper. We still have to manage the cost and the FinOps activities, which I see is demanding before we can be sure of a good choice. When it's done, it's acceptable, so could it be made easier to do? I don't know, but it is engaging us in some extra work. That's why I say not ten out of ten, but only eight out of ten.

Read full review

Adrian Bilauca

Chief Software Engineer at Totalsoft

Handles security setups independently for a more secure environment

OpenShift does have more secure features. Azure also has equivalent services. For my client, it was good enough to switch to Azure. For development, there wasn't any significant change in effort, however, for the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services. We used elasticity and scalability all over.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Azure Data Lake is useful. We are in the process of populating the data lake for our current project. Also, we are directly importing for Power BI to using PowerPlay."

"This is a product that is fast-growing and they are gaining popularity."

"The most important thing is we don't have to maintain any physical infrastructure. With typical conventional on-premise solutions, we have to maintain many things like the hardware, clusters, etc. With this cloud platform, you don't have to worry about all those things. We have the service always available, and this is the main advantage. I like that we use everything on our standard Active Directory on on-premises on Azure. The key advantage is that you can have the sole indication based on the cloud. This isn't possible with an on-premise Active Directory. This enables work from home and at the office because it's on the cloud."

"Microsoft Azure delivers a strong ROI by reducing hardware investment, minimizing maintenance overhead, and improving and supporting business continuity through cloud services."

"Azure is definitely the best for me; I am more productive because I understand the tech architecture better."

"The solution is very flexible, it is not limited to Microsoft solutions. It integrates well with other solutions, such as Oracle. There are a lot of templates we are able to use allowing us to reduce the time for configuration."

"Azure allows us to bring applications to life quickly."

"The user interface is very good for administrators."

More Microsoft Azure pros

"For the DevOps team, it was a relief since Azure has managed services."

"The portability, moving from one platform to another, is easy."

"In general, customers appreciate its ability to run different workloads, manage applications through CI/CD pipelines like Jenkins, and leverage tools like Helm charts and Kako."

"The deployment mechanism has become more dynamic with the use of the product."

"The solution offers the most robust Kubernetes orchestration available."

"Our pipeline integrates various monitoring tools like Fortify for security checks. Once the pipeline processes the code, the finished product is deployed on Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud. We ensure application setup and recovery by utilizing two separate clusters on OpenShift."

"The most valuable feature of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is the UI console. We are able to receive the resources from the console directly."

"I've used the elasticity and scalability all over."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud pros

Cons

"The initial setup can be improved."

"Pricing is one area where Azure has room for improvement. There should be some due consideration. Azure has solved some issues with pricing from the development team's standpoint, but it is still quite costly. They should also offer a trial period for the individual platform solutions. I think that would be pretty handy for the developers."

"The price should be lower."

"It can be cheaper, which might simplify things a bit."

"It took less than three years for the ROI to be zero. Over three years is better in-house for the ROI."

"Azure was pretty bad in terms of the recent service off-time for Microsoft Azure and AWS. They didn't complete 99.99% of service they provide to the customers as compared to AWS."

"Should always go with recommendations provided by Microsoft during the creation of new clusters. Otherwise, stability is an issue."

"Could be more user friendly; initial setup is difficult to understand."

More Microsoft Azure cons

"At this point, I cannot recommend this to other users because of the experience that we have had."

"The general purpose solution tries to cater to too many customers so it is heavy."

"The service mesh integrations could improve the solution."

"There is room for improvement in cluster-based queue monitoring and autoscaling."

"The effectiveness is satisfactory, and there haven't been any additional fees due to meeting demands. However, there's room for improvement in pricing, performance, and stability. Regarding the UI, it could be more user-friendly and integrated with various platforms. Currently, the UI lacks user-friendliness, especially for developers unfamiliar with container technology. Expecting them to create YAML files for security purposes is unrealistic without proper guidance or experience. This aspect needs improvement."

"The installation and configuration procedure should be simplified."

"Making it even more cost-effective could be explored."

"The performance could be better; it's a bit slow right now."

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We pay for the license on a monthly basis."

"Microsoft always provides the entry-level solution with a cheap license. Once you start to like the product, then you have to pay for the full package, which is more expensive than the entry-level solution. Every feature comes with a license and a cost. Some licenses have multiple features, and some features require a specific license."

"The price of the solution can be expensive."

"We pay a monthly licensing fee for the solution, which could be cheaper."

"It's an OPEX model, you pay as you go, or you can reserve funds."

"The pricing for us is higher because we are using IaaS."

"Reducing the price would be of benefit to our customers."

"With every cloud solution, you have to know what you need and the cost can be fine. The price can be a little bit high depending on how you manage your costs, but overall it's still a bit cheaper than an on-premise solution but with the advantage of flexibility. You're always up to date with the software, you only need to use it. You no longer have to be concerned with the on-premise physical security. We do not need to create a data center, it's more convenient for us."

More Microsoft Azure pricing and cost advice

"The pricing is a little high in China."

"This product is not costly when compared to other vendors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which PaaS Clouds solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user8586

Engineer at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees

Aug 14, 2013

Amazon vs Rackspace vs Microsoft vs Google: Cloud Hosting Services Comparison

Amazon Web Services, Rackspace OpenStack, Microsoft Windows Azure and Google are the major cloud hosting and storage service providers. Athough Amazon is top of them and is oldest in cloud market, Rackspace, Microsoft and Google are giving tough competition to each other and to Amazon also for…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Outsourcing Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Financial Services Firm

Construction Company

Comms Service Provider

18%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Performing Arts

10%

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	141
Midsize Enterprise	54
Large Enterprise	153

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Midsize Enterprise	2
Large Enterprise	6

Questions from the Community

Which is preferable - IBM Public Cloud or Microsoft Azure?

IBM Public Cloud is IBM’s Platform-as-a-Service. It aims to provide organizations with a secure cloud environment to manage data and applications. One of the features we like is the cloud activity ...

See all answers

Which is better - SAP Cloud Platform or Microsoft Azure?

One of the best features of SAP Cloud Platform is that it is web-based and you can log in from anywhere in the world. SAP Cloud Platform is suitable for companies of any size; it works well with bo...

See all answers

How does Microsoft Azure compare to Google Firebase?

I would recommend Google Firebase instead of Microsoft Azure, simply for the array of features that it has to offer. In particular, the Firebase library grants you access to a shared data structure...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

From a cost perspective, some cost-effective situations were more difficult to achieve in Azure than in OpenShift. Comparing them can be difficult since the financial services cloud had stripped ma...

See all answers

What needs improvement with Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

There is more work and effort needed for when many of the managed services are not accessible, especially in the security area. You have to do your own security setups as opposed to using a managed...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

If you want to control a more secure environment, like an on-premises environment, I use OpenShift on IBM Financial Services Cloud but not on the public cloud.

See all answers

Comparisons

Google Firebase vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 6% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 5% of the time

Pivotal Cloud Foundry vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 5% of the time

Alibaba Cloud vs Microsoft Azure

Compared 4% of the time

More Microsoft Azure Competitors

Google Cloud vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 14% of the time

Red Hat OpenShift vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 13% of the time

Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI) vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 12% of the time

Amazon AWS vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

Cloud Foundry vs Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Compared 9% of the time

More Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure

August 2026

Download Microsoft Azure product report

Buyer's Guide

PaaS Clouds

August 2026

Download Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud product report

Also Known As

Windows Azure, Azure, MS Azure

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Azure is a versatile cloud platform known for its scalability, flexibility, and ease of use, offering comprehensive solutions like virtual machines, identity management, and data storage with robust security measures and global data centers.

Azure provides a straightforward setup with dynamic scaling and seamless integration with existing tools. Its robust security, compliance with privacy laws, and global data center presence make it a trusted choice for enterprises. With features supporting DevOps, IoT, AI/ML, and hybrid cloud environments, Azure facilitates efficient cloud migration and modernization, enhancing operational efficiency.

What are some of the key features of Microsoft Azure?

Scalability: Adjust resources automatically to meet demand.
Flexibility: Support for hybrid cloud setup and smooth integration with existing tools.
Virtual Machines: Extensive support for VMs to run various workloads.
Active Directory: Robust identity and access management services.
Data Storage: Diverse storage options for different data management needs.
Security Measures: Comprehensive security protocols and compliance support.

What benefits and ROI should users consider when evaluating Microsoft Azure?

Cost Efficiency: Managed services that reduce operational costs.
Reliability: High availability with global data center coverage.
Ease of Migration: Facilitates transition from on-premises solutions to the cloud.
Operational Efficiency: User-friendly interface and extensive training resources.

Organizations primarily use Azure for infrastructure services, application hosting, and data management across industries such as finance, healthcare, and retail. Resellers deploy cloud services for clients in private, public, and hybrid clouds, supporting enterprise applications and digital transformation projects.

Microsoft

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is known for its efficient transaction processing, robust Kubernetes orchestration, and seamless portability. It enhances application management and provides a versatile GUI for accessing resources on any cloud, aiding developers with a stable setup across platforms.

This offering supports continuous integration and deployment pipelines, integrating security checks with Fortify. The intuitive console allows for direct resource access, streamlining application management. Suitable for deploying workloads on public or private clouds, it handles middleware telecom transactions, digital application APIs, and manages microservices effectively. While appreciated for easy setup and stable performance, areas like autoscaling, performance, and pricing require enhancements for improved user experience.

What are the key features of Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Kubernetes Orchestration: Efficiently manages Kubernetes applications across clusters.
Autoscaling: Dynamically adjusts resources based on demand.
Security Integration: Supports Fortify for robust security checks.
CI/CD Pipelines: Facilitates automation in deployment processes.
GUI Access: Provides a user-friendly interface for resource management.

What benefits can users expect from Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud?

Seamless Portability: Easily migrate applications across cloud environments.
Enhanced Stability: Offers a stable environment for deploying workloads.
Improved Efficiency: Streamlines management with advanced orchestration.
Cost-Effectiveness: Optimizes resource usage for budget-friendly operations.

Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud is widely implemented in industries focusing on telecom and digital applications. Companies deploy microservices for secure, cloud-based environments, leveraging Kubernetes for managing services effectively. It enables advanced cluster management and supports deployment of customer services on both IBM and Microsoft platforms.

IBM

Sample Customers

BMW, Toyota, easyJet, NBC Sports, HarperCollins, Aviva, TalkTalk Business, Avanade, and Telenor.

edenor, Ford

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

September 2026

Free Report: Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud and other solutions. Updated: September 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

912,753 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft Azure vs. Red Hat OpenShift on IBM Cloud report.

See our list of best PaaS Clouds vendors.

We monitor all PaaS Clouds reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.