Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and Microsoft Defender for Cloud compete in cloud and container management solutions. OpenShift is preferred for robust development processes and security, while Defender excels in integrating security across cloud services.
Features: OpenShift offers robust auto-scalability, a developer-friendly environment enhancing productivity, and excels in cluster management with strong security features. Defender for Cloud is recognized for strong security features, seamless integration with cloud-native services, and extensive regulatory compliance support.
Room for Improvement: OpenShift could improve networking capabilities, simplify deployments, and enhance cloud migration documentation. It also has a steep learning curve and high costs. Defender should address false positives, simplify its dashboard, and enhance threat detection automation while resolving pricing and complex licensing issues.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenShift is versatile across on-premises, private, and hybrid environments but requires technical expertise and may have support response delays. Defender offers strong public and hybrid cloud deployment with centralized support, but licensing complexities affect deployment preferences.
Pricing and ROI: OpenShift is viewed as high-cost with significant enterprise ROI due to reduced operational costs and productivity benefits. Its pricing matches its enterprise-level features. Defender is considered costly with complex licensing, but provides flexible pricing tiers justified by its security features and integration capabilities.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
They should prioritize skilled engineers for urgent issues.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
It has multiple licenses and features, covering infrastructures from a hundred to five hundred virtual machines, without any issues.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
I rate the scalability of Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform as a nine, as I haven't encountered any issues with scaling a cluster or applications.
Scalability is rated nine out of ten.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
There haven't been any issues so far; it remains stable with no downtime or crashes, and even the upgrades are handled seamlessly without issues.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
It would be beneficial to streamline recommendations to avoid unnecessary alerts and to refine the severity of alerts based on specific environments or environmental attributes.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
The solution itself doesn't require a high learning curve; it is actually quite good to manage.
I would like to see advanced cluster management added in future releases, such as a single pane of glass to manage multiple clusters.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
The current licensing cost for this solution is around $23,000 per year, per month.
Regarding whether Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform is expensive or if the price is reasonable for my customers, to me, the services it provides should incur some costs, but based on market feedback, it is quite expensive.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
It is important for critical systems.
The cluster scaling features, such as the auto-scaling of cluster nodes and application replicas using horizontal and vertical pod auto-scaling, significantly impact our operations.
In terms of features in Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform, I find the orchestration itself quite useful for my customers because it integrates with lots of tools.
Product | Market Share (%) |
---|---|
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform | 19.5% |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud | 1.1% |
Other | 79.4% |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 26 |
Midsize Enterprise | 7 |
Large Enterprise | 45 |
Company Size | Count |
---|---|
Small Business | 14 |
Midsize Enterprise | 4 |
Large Enterprise | 39 |
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
Red Hat® OpenShift® offers a consistent hybrid cloud foundation for building and scaling containerized applications. Benefit from streamlined platform installation and upgrades from one of the enterprise Kubernetes leaders.
We monitor all Container Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.