Tenable Vulnerability Management and Microsoft Defender for Cloud are leaders in the cybersecurity category. Tenable stands out in vulnerability scanning, whereas Microsoft Defender excels in seamless integration and regulatory compliance support, giving it an edge in multi-cloud environments.
Features: Tenable Vulnerability Management provides a complete view of both on-premises and cloud environments, supports remote device monitoring through local agents, and integrates with third-party tools. Microsoft Defender for Cloud offers comprehensive threat detection, seamlessly integrates with Microsoft services, and provides extensive regulatory compliance guidance through Microsoft’s threat intelligence network.
Room for Improvement: Tenable could enhance its user interface, improve reporting capabilities, and clarify licensing information. It does not provide a platform for testing vulnerability exploitability. Microsoft Defender should reduce false-positive alerts, enhance automation, and improve integration with third-party tools. Its user interface requires better consistency and customization for reporting.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Tenable offers a straightforward initial setup across various environments but faces challenges in customer support responsiveness and the need for co-support structures. Microsoft Defender is easily deployed in public cloud environments but can have complexities in user support and service consistency.
Pricing and ROI: Tenable is considered expensive for SMBs, though it provides good ROI but could benefit from a pay-as-you-go option. Microsoft's bundled offerings are competitively priced, but activating extensive features can be costly. The complexity of its pricing model may deter smaller businesses.
Defender proactively indexes and analyzes documents, identifying potential threats even when inactive, enhancing preventative security.
Identifying potential vulnerabilities has helped us avoid costly data losses.
The biggest return on investment is the rapid improvement of security posture.
Since security is critical, we prefer a quicker response time.
The support team was very responsive to queries.
They understand their product, but much like us, they struggle with the finer details, especially with new features.
It needs improvement in response time and addressing feature requests promptly.
We are using infrastructure as a code, so we do not have any scalability issues with Microsoft Defender for Cloud implementation because our cloud automatically does it.
Defender won't replace our endpoint XDR, but it will likely adapt and support any growth in the Microsoft Cloud space.
There might be scalability issues as you scale up to large enterprises.
They can seamlessly scale the number of endpoints from 100 to 1,000,000 in a day.
Defender's stability has been flawless for us.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is very stable.
Microsoft sometimes changes settings or configurations without transparency.
I have faced no stability issues with Tenable.
Microsoft, in general, could significantly improve its communication and support.
The artificial intelligence features could be expanded to allow the system to autonomously manage security issues without needing intervention from admins.
I've heard there might be issues with scalability for larger enterprises.
They should also accelerate the process of implementing new features upon request.
Every time we consider expanding usage, we carefully evaluate the necessity due to cost concerns.
We appreciate the licensing approach based on employee count rather than a big enterprise license.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is pricey, especially for Kubernetes clusters.
Tenable charges around $40 per device, while Rapid7 costs $10 to $15 per device.
The most valuable feature for me is the variety of APIs available.
This feature significantly aids in threat detection and enhances the user experience by streamlining security management.
The most valuable feature is the recommendations provided on how to improve security.
Tenable enables vulnerability management through potential AI integration that consolidates efforts and resolves multiple vulnerabilities simultaneously.
Microsoft Defender for Cloud is a comprehensive security solution that provides advanced threat protection for cloud workloads. It offers real-time visibility into the security posture of cloud environments, enabling organizations to quickly identify and respond to potential threats. With its advanced machine learning capabilities, Microsoft Defender for Cloud can detect and block sophisticated attacks, including zero-day exploits and fileless malware.
The solution also provides automated remediation capabilities, allowing security teams to quickly and easily respond to security incidents. With Microsoft Defender for Cloud, organizations can ensure the security and compliance of their cloud workloads, while reducing the burden on their security teams.
Managed in the cloud and powered by Tenable Nessus, Tenable Vulnerability Management (formerly Tenable.io) provides the industry's most comprehensive vulnerability coverage with real-time continuous assessment of your organization. Built-in prioritization, threat intelligence and real-time insight help you understand your exposures and proactively prioritize remediations.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.