Microsoft Entra ID Protection vs Silverfort comparison

Microsoft and Silverfort are both solutions in the Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) category. Microsoft is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.9, while Silverfort is ranked #12. Microsoft holds a 7.1% mindshare in ITDR, compared to Silverfort’s 5.0% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Silverfort users who would recommend it.

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Read 21 Microsoft Entra ID Protection reviews

3,505 Views
1,998 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Silverfort

Read 1 Silverfort review

2,644 Views
952 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Silverfort

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 8, 2026

Silverfort and Microsoft Entra ID Protection are key players in identity protection. Microsoft Entra ID Protection has the upper hand with its comprehensive feature set enhancing its value.

Features: Silverfort offers adaptive authentication, unified policy enforcement across hybrid environments, and stands out in flexibility. Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides advanced threat detection, automated risk-based conditional access, and integrated threat intelligence for better security measures.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Silverfort is known for straightforward deployment and personalized customer service. Microsoft Entra ID Protection, part of Microsoft's ecosystem, provides a seamless deployment experience but may need more initial configuration. Microsoft provides robust support.

Pricing and ROI: Silverfort is cost-effective with rapid ROI, appealing to budget-conscious buyers. Microsoft Entra ID Protection might require more initial investment but delivers a strong ROI through advanced features and integration capabilities. Silverfort is noted for competitive pricing, while Microsoft justifies its cost with an extensive feature set.

To learn more, read our detailed Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Report (Updated: March 2026).

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

March 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 884,122 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

2nd

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Identity Management (IM) (7th), Microsoft Security Suite (8th)

Silverfort

Ranking in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

12th

Average Rating

0.0

Reviews Sentiment

8.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) (7th), Non-Human Identity Management (NHIM) (10th), Identity Security and Posture Management (ISPM) (4th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2026, in the Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra ID Protection is 7.1%, down from 18.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Silverfort is 5.0%, down from 5.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
Microsoft Entra ID Protection	7.1%
Silverfort	5.0%
Other	87.9%

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

Featured Reviews

Luis Gabriel Mieles Benavides

Cloud Architect at Sonda S.A.

Identity protection has strengthened daily access control and improved passwordless security

The best features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection include the password dictionary, which we do not have in Active Directory. Conditional access is excellent because we can select the location from which users authenticate, and this is the best feature for me. Another valuable feature is the ability to identify critical or suspicious computers. If computers are too old or too suspicious, the system does not allow authentication, which is excellent. The effectiveness of automated remediation for handling identity threats is great. I use passwordless authentication with cellular phone authentication, which is excellent because we do not always need a password. Microsoft Entra ID Protection is a great solution overall because it improves security in the company through identity management. It improves integration with other solutions such as Google, Gmail, Hotmail, Outlook, and Facebook. We can create different applications and integrate with different services.

Read full review

reviewer2342856

Senior Solutions Specialist at a computer software company with 5,001-10,000 employees

Positive feedback highlights lightweight design and compatibility while suggesting more AI integration

Silverfort helps identify blind spots in your identity and access management, covering areas that traditional systems don't, such as command line tools. It checks your Active Directory authentication and continues only if the check is okay, plus it works with older protocols such as NTLM, which is a significant advantage. It's complementary to other tools you may have, whether they are TAM solutions such as Delinea or Xerox. Silverfort also has a lightweight adapter for domain controllers, and it finds gaps in security. Its capabilities are expanding regularly, with new features voted on every few months. For companies with large Active Directory implementations and zero staff, Silverfort provides instant results in identifying risks and blind spots. It also includes built-in virtual features, and while I don't know the exact pricing, it's not expensively priced, making it an attractive option.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The valuable features include multifactor authentication, accessory capabilities, and conditional access for specific applications."

"The multifactor authentication feature is effective, providing an additional layer of security."

"I use conditional access most of the time."

"The reverse proxy feature provides additional security that is not available in other solutions."

"For me, automatization is most valuable."

"We can solve many problems without deep knowledge of coding, and it's very quick to solve problems with the no-code, low-code solution of Microsoft for us."

"The primary and most valuable aspect of Azure AD identity is its ability to function seamlessly on both on-premise and cloud infrastructure, eliminating the need for extensive updates. However, this dual solution can pose vulnerabilities that require substantial support and security measures in the on-premise environment. Despite the challenges, it is currently not feasible to completely abandon AD, especially for companies in the sales and energy sectors. The integration with Microsoft Defender is crucial for enhancing security, making identity and security the primary focus and purpose of Azure AD."

"Microsoft Entra ID Protection is a great solution overall because it improves security in the company through identity management."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection pros

"Silverfort helps identify blind spots in your identity and access management, covering areas that traditional systems don't, such as command line tools."

Cons

"Identity protection and trust issues, particularly in hybrid environments, could be addressed better with Microsoft Entra ID Protection. This would aid connectivity concerns."

"There is room for improvement in the ability for Entra ID Protection to inherit roles and configurations from whatever solution I am migrating from, so that these don't have to be built from the ground up during the implementation process."

"Microsoft has not offered control over how they calculate high or low-risk scenarios."

"Entra ID lacks a function to synchronize from the cloud to the local directory. This is a significant issue since there is no write-back feature from the cloud to local, which would allow me to use my own credentials from the cloud tenant securely."

"The pricing could be improved."

"Support or customer service with Microsoft Entra ID Protection can be challenging because you can get lost in the queue. You can open up a case, but sometimes it can be an hour or even a day between communications."

"Azure AD could improve by enhancing the availability of specialized courses for security, such as NETSCOUT security or other relevant certifications. It would be beneficial to have specific courses for security, to provide in-depth knowledge and skills related to Azure AD. While there are micro-learning resources available for various concepts, many people in the IT industry may not have the time to go through all the courses to properly configure and utilize Azure Active Directory. Simplifying the implementation process and making it easier for individuals to join a company with Azure AD could also be considered areas for improvement."

"I rate the quality of support at four out of ten because of inefficiencies in the ticket handling process. Tickets often bounce from person to person, requiring the sharing of information multiple times."

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection cons

"If Silverfort could integrate a gentle type of AI similar to Microsoft Copilot or enable workflow creation similar to Salesforce, it would further improve user navigation, even though the platform is already simple."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"From one to ten, if one is cheap and ten is expensive, I rate the tool a seven out of ten."

"The product cost is on the expensive side."

"The price of Azure AD is not expensive."

"Azure Active Directory Identity Protection is not very expensive."

"The pricing is competitive in the SMA segment and runs $5-$6 per user."

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

15%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Retailer

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	15
Midsize Enterprise	1
Large Enterprise	5

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

The pricing for Microsoft Entra ID protection is not expensive. It varies based on the company's size and quality.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

I do not think there are any areas that could be improved with Microsoft Entra ID Protection at this time.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Azure Active Directory Identity Protection?

I use Microsoft Entra ID Protection and provide support for features such as multifactor authentication and conditional access. I work with this solution every day.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silverfort?

I think Silverfort is actually a really good product. I might suggest adding more AI to it, which I believe could enhance its functionality. If Silverfort could integrate a gentle type of AI simila...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silverfort?

I'm calling from PeerSpot, and we're resellers in the identity space, offering products such as Savient, SailPoint, CyberArk, and Silverfort. We are resellers, and I work in presale, focusing on fi...

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Silverfort?

I prefer to remain anonymous. Please don't use my name; just label it as anonymous. I would prefer both my name and the company name to be kept anonymous. If you could just put identity presales sp...

See all answers

Comparisons

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 12% of the time

One Identity Manager vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 9% of the time

BloodHound Enterprise vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

SailPoint Identity Security Cloud vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 5% of the time

SentinelOne Singularity Identity vs Microsoft Entra ID Protection

Compared 3% of the time

More Microsoft Entra ID Protection Competitors

CrowdStrike Falcon vs Silverfort

Compared 10% of the time

CyberArk Privileged Access Manager vs Silverfort

Compared 6% of the time

Microsoft Defender for Identity vs Silverfort

Compared 6% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Silverfort

Compared 4% of the time

RSA SecurID vs Silverfort

Compared 3% of the time

More Silverfort Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft Entra ID Protection

February 2026

Download Microsoft Entra ID Protection product report

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

March 2026

Download Silverfort product report

Also Known As

Azure Active Directory Identity Protection, Azure AD Identity Protection

No data available

Overview

Microsoft Entra ID Protection enhances security through features like conditional access and multifactor authentication, optimizing identity management for enterprises. This robust solution ensures efficient control over access policies, supporting seamless integration and operational efficiency.

Microsoft Entra ID Protection provides advanced identity management, authentication, and authorization capabilities, supporting multifactor authentication and single sign-on to control digital identities effectively. It utilizes adaptive machine learning for security enhancements and automated risk-based actions, with seamless Microsoft Defender integration. Connectivity with third-party applications and real-time monitoring offers improved operational efficiency for managing large user bases. While it is a powerful tool, there is room to grow in areas such as identity labeling, password management, faster synchronization, better Mac compatibility, and improved scalability. Desired features include enhanced course availability for security training, streamlined implementation processes, and clarified interfaces.

What are the key features of Microsoft Entra ID Protection?

Conditional Access: Control access policies to secure identity-related activities.
Multifactor Authentication: Strengthen sign-in security with multiple verification methods.
Single Sign-On: Simplify access to applications with a single set of credentials.
Identity Governance: Maintain compliance and manage identities efficiently.

What benefits should be considered in reviews?

Enhanced Security: Adaptive machine learning and risk-based actions reduce vulnerabilities.
Operational Efficiency: Integration and monitoring capabilities facilitate large-scale management.
Compliance Support: Aids in maintaining security compliance strategies.
Seamless Integration: Works effectively with Microsoft Defender and third-party apps.

Organizations leverage Microsoft Entra ID Protection to manage identities and access across sectors such as finance, healthcare, and technology. They integrate hybrid environments, enforcing multifactor authentication and conditional access policies, which enables them to secure digital identities and align with compliance operations. Many synchronize on-premises Active Directory with cloud services, effectively managing users, groups, and licenses.

Microsoft

Silverfort is a unified identity protection platform that helps organizations protect their networks and cloud environments from identity-based attacks. The platform uses agentless and proxyless technology to continuously monitor all access of users and service accounts across both cloud and on-premise environments, analyze risk in real time using an AI-based engine, and enforce adaptive authentication and access policies.

Silverfort has been praised by real users for its ability to protect against a wide range of identity-based threats, including ransomware, credential theft, and lateral movement. The platform has also been shown to be effective in meeting the requirements of cyber insurance policies.

Some of the key features of Silverfort include:

Silverfort can be deployed without the need to install agents on endpoints or proxies in the network. This makes it easy to deploy and manage, and it also reduces the risk of introducing security vulnerabilities.
Silverfort uses an AI-based engine to continuously analyze all access and identify suspicious activity. This allows organizations to respond quickly to threats before they can cause damage.
Silverfort can enforce adaptive authentication and access policies based on real-time risk assessments. This helps to prevent unauthorized access and mitigate the risk of data breaches.

Here are some additional details about Silverfort that may be helpful for you:

Priocing: Silverfort is a subscription-based service. Pricing is based on the number of users and assets protected.
Customer Support: Silverfort offers 24/7 support via phone, email, and chat.
Integrations: Silverfort integrates with a wide range of third-party security solutions, including SIEMs, firewalls, and identity providers.

Silverfort

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

Singtel, Egan, Agilisys, Reliance Worldwide Corporation, Indosat, ZOL Hospital

Buyer's Guide

Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR)

March 2026

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about CrowdStrike, Microsoft, Huntress and others in Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR). Updated: March 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

884,122 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) vendors.

We monitor all Identity Threat Detection and Response (ITDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.