Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs SAP Customer Identity and Access Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft Entra Verified ID
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
7th
Average Rating
7.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
Microsoft Security Suite (24th)
SAP Customer Identity and A...
Ranking in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
12th
Average Rating
8.6
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) category, the mindshare of Microsoft Entra Verified ID is 7.9%, down from 9.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Customer Identity and Access Management is 2.2%, up from 2.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Andy Yen - PeerSpot reviewer
Nov 27, 2023
Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights
We use the product as a single sign-on for our business applications.  Microsoft Entra Verified ID is our primary way of authenticating into ServiceNow apps. It helps us to stay connected in the company.  I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication.  I…
Srini-Dhanaraj - PeerSpot reviewer
Feb 7, 2024
A set of tools that allows you to manage user access to the Fiori apps and specify what users can do and see in the apps
Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is some functionality where you can go and enable and disable everything in no time.  You could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which allows us to create the…

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The most valuable features of the solution are mainly in the areas of security and auditing."
"I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is a there is some functionality where you could go and be enabled and disable everything, you can do it with no time."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is the provisioning of a lot of SAP systems. It offers automated provisioning."
 

Cons

"The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"The automated provisioning only works well with the SAP products and there are some problems with the non-SAP products. Even if it is SAP, if it is a non-ABAP system, it is a little bit problematic."
"Only component, I would think the database is inbuilt. So you could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which is which allow us to create the customer or delete the Customer. And it won't allow for any change. The data migration needs improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is cheap and ten is very expensive, I rate the product price as seven."
"The pricing of the solution is cheap."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Healthcare Company
8%
Government
8%
No data available
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft Entra Verified ID?
I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication.
What needs improvement with Microsoft Entra Verified ID?
Honestly, I cannot comment on what needs improvement because we don't have any requirements. All our requirements are met with the tool. The tool's expensive nature is an area of concern where impr...
What is your primary use case for Microsoft Entra Verified ID?
In our company, Microsoft Entra Verified ID is not used in a full-fledged capacity. I would say that the product is used partially, specifically when employees are being moved around.
What do you like most about SAP Customer Identity and Access Management?
Seamless integration is the most valuable feature. There is a there is some functionality where you could go and be enabled and disable everything, you can do it with no time.
What needs improvement with SAP Customer Identity and Access Management?
You could use only SAP provided the API to extract. And there is one channel I experienced during the data migration, which allows us to create the customer or delete the customer. And it won't all...
What advice do you have for others considering SAP Customer Identity and Access Management?
The implementation is very simplified, and it's a progressive implementation. Overall I would rate the solution a nine out of ten.
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. SAP Customer Identity and Access Management and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.