Top 10 Microsoft Entra Verified ID Alternatives

4.0 out of 5

4 reviews
75% willing to recommend

Top Microsoft Entra Verified ID Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Microsoft Entra Verified ID based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Auth0, Ping Identity Platform, and Okta Customer Identity. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Microsoft Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Microsoft, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Auth0

4.2 out of 5

Auth0 is preferred for its ease of integration and support while Microsoft Entra Verified ID is known for its strong security and seamless Microsoft integration. In comparison, Auth0 offers quick deployment, whereas Microsoft Entra provides long-term ROI within Microsoft-centric environments.

Download Auth0 vs. Microsoft Entra Verified ID Report

Pricing

Auth0's setup cost is competitive, offering simplicity in initial implementation, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID tends to have a higher setup cost, focusing on advanced features and enterprise integration, highlighting a distinct approach in pricing structures.

View comparison

Pricing

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Ping Identity Platform

4.1 out of 5

Ping Identity Platform offers strong security and flexible access management across multiple applications, attracting businesses prioritizing high-security management. In comparison, Microsoft Entra Verified ID caters to those seeking decentralized identity solutions and seamless integration with Microsoft’s ecosystem, benefiting enterprises already using Microsoft services.

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Ping Identity Platform Report

Pricing

Ping Identity Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Entra Verified ID, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting their distinct pricing strategies.

View comparison

Pricing

Ping Identity Platform has a higher initial setup cost compared to Microsoft Entra Verified ID, which offers a more budget-friendly entry point, highlighting their distinct pricing strategies.

Okta Customer Identity

4.2 out of 5

Okta Customer Identity

4.2 out of 5

Okta Customer Identity is favored for streamlined integration and excellent customer service. In comparison, Microsoft Entra Verified ID offers advanced features and robust security with higher costs. Tech buyers may choose Okta for simplicity or Microsoft for innovative verification and long-term value.

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. Okta Customer Identity Report

Pricing

Okta Customer Identity may require a significant setup cost, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID typically offers more affordable initial setup options.

View comparison

Pricing

Okta Customer Identity may require a significant setup cost, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID typically offers more affordable initial setup options.

SAP Customer Identity and Access Management

4.3 out of 5

SAP Customer Identity and Access Management

4.3 out of 5

SAP Customer Identity and Access Management excels in streamlined deployment and cost-effectiveness, appealing to budget-conscious organizations. In comparison, Microsoft Entra Verified ID offers decentralized identity solutions with advanced security, requiring a more complex setup, appealing to those prioritizing comprehensive identity protection.

Download Microsoft Entra Verified ID vs. SAP Customer Identity and Access Management Report

Pricing

SAP Customer Identity and Access Management has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID is more budget-friendly.

View comparison

Pricing

SAP Customer Identity and Access Management has a higher setup cost, while Microsoft Entra Verified ID is more budget-friendly.

Related categories

Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)

Microsoft Security Suite

Single Sign-On (SSO)