We performed a comparison between Microsoft Entra Verified ID and Okta Customer Identity based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Auth0, Ping Identity, Omada and others in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM)."I like the Microsoft Authenticator app since it comes with two-factor authentication."
"As far as our security team is concerned, the ease of implementing multifactor authentication is definitely the biggest value for our organization."
"We can integrate two-factor authentication with the applications."
"The solution has great multifactor authentication."
"Okta has more when it comes to the policy level. It has distinctive features where you can do a mix and combination to have users access applications for various business cases."
"The most valuable feature of Okta Customer Identity is its SSO because it's very easy to use and it's user-friendly. Even the admin portal of the solution is very user-friendly, and you can walk through it with ease. Okta Customer Identity is not a complicated solution, and even the workflow automation feature is very, very easy to understand."
"The end user's ease of use is the most valuable feature."
"I think all the functions of the solution are vital and important because life cycle management is important for some companies. The Single Sign-On feature is fantastic for different customers and advanced server access is really good for access to the servers."
"There is no password hash saved on the cloud, which is the part that I like the most."
"I must do two-factor authentication when I sign in from a different location. It creates friction. It's not personalized for the end user. I would like to see specific insights."
"I would like to see the provisioning simplified."
"Okta has a limitation with directory integrations. If you have multiple Active Directory integrations, the user distinguished name (DN) and the manager DN don't get imported properly into the Okta user profile."
"There is an access request system that is very limited access to the systems available for end-users. The access request should improve in Okta Customer Identity."
"Some limitations in scalability. Each application we work with can be completely different, resulting in highly variable implementation processes."
"The integration process takes a bit longer than we would want it to."
"All of the governance functionality and privileged account management could be improved."
"The product must be provided for free."
"In the future, we'd like to see the product implement more security features, like, for example, zero-trust."
Microsoft Entra Verified ID is ranked 8th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 1 review while Okta Customer Identity is ranked 5th in Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) with 13 reviews. Microsoft Entra Verified ID is rated 6.0, while Okta Customer Identity is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Entra Verified ID writes "Offers single sign-on feature for business applications but needs to offer personalized insights ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Okta Customer Identity writes "Ability to work with a wide range of applications and security mechanisms". Microsoft Entra Verified ID is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Identity, Microsoft Intune, Microsoft Entra ID, Auth0 and Microsoft Purview Data Governance, whereas Okta Customer Identity is most compared with ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Auth0 and Frontegg.
See our list of best Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) vendors.
We monitor all Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.