Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs Nintex Process Platform comparison

Microsoft and Nintex are both solutions in the Process Automation category. Microsoft is ranked #19 with an average rating of 9.0, while Nintex is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.3. Microsoft holds a 0.8% mindshare in PA, compared to Nintex’s 1.9% mindshare. Additionally, 33% of Microsoft users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 90% of Nintex users who would recommend it.

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Read 2 Microsoft System Center Orchestrator reviews

1,113 Views
314 Comparison Views

33% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

1,771 Views
1,052 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Nintex Process Platform

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and Microsoft System Center Orchestrator are products in the business process automation domain. Nintex has an advantage in ease of use and scalability, while Microsoft System Center Orchestrator stands out with integration capabilities due to its alignment with Microsoft's ecosystem.

Features: Nintex Process Platform offers no-code process automation, flexible form design, and document generation. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator enables deep integration with Microsoft technologies, delivering robust automation across systems and applications. Nintex focuses on user-friendly interfaces and rapid deployment, whereas Orchestrator supports extensive customization for complex IT environments.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform is known for simplified deployment requiring minimal IT intervention, reducing time to market, and offers strong customer support through comprehensive resources. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator, with its extensive feature set, requires more complex deployment but benefits from integration with larger IT infrastructure and Microsoft's extensive support network. The choice depends on the organization's tech setup, with Nintex favoring non-technical deployment and Orchestrator aligning with deeper infrastructural integration.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform provides tiered pricing options to reduce upfront costs, delivering high ROI through quick automation. Microsoft System Center Orchestrator may have higher initial setup costs but offers strong ROI in Microsoft-reliant environments. The decision hinges on initial budget limits versus long-term infrastructural benefits.

To learn more, read our detailed Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 847,959 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Microsoft System Center Orc...

Ranking in Process Automation

19th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Process Automation

9th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Management (BPM) (10th), Workload Automation (11th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Process Automation category, the mindshare of Microsoft System Center Orchestrator is 0.8%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 1.9%, down from 3.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Process Automation

Featured Reviews

Dan Campeanu

Security Engineer at ProVision

Automates tasks and manages multiple servers from a central location

The initial setup was quite complex. It required careful preparation of installation steps, as many tasks were not automated as expected. Special attention was needed to prepare groups, users, and permissions at each step to ensure a smooth setup process. Please do so accurately to avoid having to start over. Challenges encountered during deployment included issues with installation and configuration and difficulties detecting machines and executing tasks as expected. Some solutions were found through trial and error during installation, while others were discovered through recommendations from other users. Despite these challenges, the deployment and rollout of Orchestrator took approximately one and a half months to ensure proper functionality.

Read full review

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Automation is the most valuable feature of the solution."

"It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location."

"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."

"Only Nintex has the feature which allows attachments to an email."

"The strength of this solution lies in its connectors and the accessibility of an open API. The presence of an open API allows users to create custom connectors if necessary, provided there is access to the source API documentation. Additionally, the platform features a straightforward yet highly effective forms tool. This tool not only seamlessly integrates with the workflow functionality but also facilitates the transmission of information to the document generation tool. This comprehensive integration is particularly noteworthy when compared to alternatives such as Oracle, which tends to rely on more complex and separate logic for similar functionalities. A key strength of Nintex lies in its user-centric approach to help documentation. The materials are designed to be easily understood, avoiding complex terminology. In cases where technical terms are used, they are linked to articles for further clarification. This contrasts with platforms like Microsoft and Oracle, which may employ technical jargon without clear explanations. Nintex further supports its users through a robust online community, fostering collaboration and shared insights. Additionally, Nintex University offers online training across all applications, following a role-based structure. Unlike some other platforms, Nintex's training is thoughtfully broken down into shorter courses, focused on specific roles. This approach ensures that users can efficiently access the information they need without navigating through extensive and potentially irrelevant content, as may be the case with Oracle's training structure."

"It saves time as tasks are automated."

"It provides data accuracy with fewer failures."

"NWC forms could be better. Also, the ability to build workflows that are not dependent on SharePoint is very desirable. The forms feature just isn’t as functional as the forms for SharePoint."

"It can scale well."

"The solution helped us automate several processes we used to do manually."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

Cons

"I find the Orchestrator UI to be problematic."

"The product's management aspect needs enhancement."

"Currently, it's taking quite some time to deploy a package, it needs improvement"

"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."

"Bring all features available from the on-premise product into the cloud version and the workflow error reporting."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

"The licensing needs to be improved. Right now, we find it's getting more expensive to use the product."

"User interface could use some improvement. Perhaps integration with Visual Studio or SharePoint Designer would be useful."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

"It's very tedious to manage."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost."

"I give the cost of the solution a five out of ten."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"For the initial hundred users, the cost is $21,000 per year, which I find too high."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"Comparatively, it's expensive."

"It's more suited for enterprise level, not for small or medium-sized businesses (SMBs)."

"Prices for licenses of K2 are high."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Process Automation solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

14%

Government

11%

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

It can manage multiple servers and workstations from a single location.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The platform was almost free of cost for us. We obtained a license that bundled Windows Server with System Center at no additional cost.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Microsoft System Center Orchestrator?

The product's management aspect needs enhancement. It affects the visibility of powerful scripts that were previously accessible. Furthermore, the focus is shifting towards cloud-based features, sp...

See all answers

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Comparisons

ServiceNow Orchestration vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 25% of the time

BizTalk Server vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 20% of the time

Camunda vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 20% of the time

vCenter Orchestrator vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 14% of the time

Rundeck vs Microsoft System Center Orchestrator

Compared 12% of the time

More Microsoft System Center Orchestrator Competitors

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 23% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Process Automation

April 2025

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator report

Download Microsoft System Center Orchestrator product report

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

March 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Also Known As

MS System Center Orchestrator

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Overview

As an IT administrator, you probably perform a lot of tasks and procedures to keep your computing environment healthy. You may have automated individual tasks, but typically, not the whole process. With System Center - Orchestrator you tie disparate tasks and procedures together using a graphical user interface Runbook Designer to create reliable, flexible, and efficient end-to-end solutions in your IT environment.

Microsoft

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

Sample Customers

Information Not Available

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Buyer's Guide

Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Free Report: Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

847,959 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Microsoft System Center Orchestrator vs. Nintex Process Platform report.

See our list of best Process Automation vendors.

We monitor all Process Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.