We performed a comparison between Mirantis Container Cloud and Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Container Security solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup was really easy and the deployment was fast and straightforward."
"The most valuable feature is its ease of use."
"One of the most valuable feature is its scalability because it is easy to work with. Even though I haven't fully removed it before, it's simple to get started and develop further. It's comparable to working with languages like C++ and Python. Python. It is easy to understand and more user-friendly."
"When you have Kubernetes, you can use Mirantis Container Cloud to manage your Kubernetes for easy access and security. It also helps you to manage your CI/CD system. It helps you to build a container-oriented developer workflow. So, if you're building an application in Kubernetes, it provides you with a Kubernetes engine."
"You need to make an architectural runway before actually starting to implement Docker Compose, especially in a distributed environment."
"I use Docker in combination with Kubernetes. Management of software packages is easy. It also can be done fast. Rolling out new software updates is smoother and faster due to Mirantis Container Cloud."
"I like the automation in deployment. I can deploy whenever I want based on the environment, and I can easily roll back to a previous version for testing."
"It is a compact, complete solution that performs well."
"Prisma Cloud also provides the visibility and control you need, regardless of how complex or distributed your cloud environments become. It helps to simplify that complexity. Now we know what the best practices are, and if something is missing we know."
"I was looking for a vulnerability scanner and I was looking for one place in which I could find everything. This tool not only does vulnerability scanning, but it also gives me an asset management tool."
"It provides good visibility and control regardless of the complexity."
"CSPM is very useful because it gives us good policies and violation alerts."
"The visibility on alerts helps you investigate more easily and see details faster."
"The dynamic workload identity creation, attestation, and assignment is the best feature. In addition, the application dependency map across heterogeneous environments for compliance is a striking feature."
"My favorite feature is the CWPP module. We can define various kinds of rules for vulnerabilities, incidents, or suspicious activities."
"I found the network queue sets useful. I also liked the Workload Protection Module, the vulnerability findings, and how the rule sets handle the vulnerabilities based on severity."
"The initial setup was quite complex."
"The orchestration and tracing should be improved."
"More integrations with other platforms would be beneficial."
"I find Docker easier to use, but I gave it to an inexperienced developer and it took him a lot of time to understand."
"Integration with Windows is something that can be improved."
"It will be better if the product provides dynamic load-balancing capabilities."
"Sometimes the basic support is a bit difficult if you have a firewall and cloud servers behind the firewall and then try to implement the backup solution, it is a bit difficult to do by yourself."
"In my previous years, I have brainstormed about the development of Container software. I have recently shifted focus, but the knowledge gained from those were really helpful. In my experience, Containers have their own complexities and to implement them, open source information is crucial. A software with new features would be beneficial. I suggest to implement a flow-based approach for container sequences, similar to Google Cloud's machine learning. The current process of deploying containers involves too many steps, and a more streamlined method would be appreciated. I've even automated deployment using APIs. Overall, simplifying container management and deployment processes would be valuable."
"While the code security feature has undergone recent enhancements, there is room for improvement in terms of its cost module."
"The UI is the worst."
"They charge seven workloads for monitoring one compute, and that is quite expensive. This makes it difficult to move fully with the compute part because of the workload."
"When it comes to compliance, the issue is that when we are exporting the reports, there is only a single compliance option. If I need to report on multiple compliance requirements, that feature isn't available. For example, I made a single report for ISO 27000 but I can't correlate it with GDPR."
"It would be ideal if they could somehow reduce the deployment time."
"They could improve more features for the enterprise version of the solution."
"We have discovered that Prisma is not functioning properly with GCP."
"They can improve the integrations into the SDLC lifecycle."
More Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Mirantis Container Cloud is ranked 14th in Container Security with 29 reviews while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 1st in Container Security with 82 reviews. Mirantis Container Cloud is rated 8.8, while Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Mirantis Container Cloud writes "An easy-to-manage solution that helps to manage web pages ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks writes "The dashboard is very user-friendly and can be used to generate custom RQL based on user requirements". Mirantis Container Cloud is most compared with SUSE Rancher, whereas Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Wiz, Microsoft Defender for Cloud, Aqua Cloud Security Platform, AWS Security Hub and CrowdStrike Falcon Cloud Security. See our Mirantis Container Cloud vs. Prisma Cloud by Palo Alto Networks report.
See our list of best Container Security vendors.
We monitor all Container Security reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
