Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Mule ESB vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus comparison

Salesforce and TIBCO are both solutions in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category. Salesforce is ranked #2 with an average rating of 7.9, while TIBCO is ranked #10 with an average rating of 7.0. Salesforce holds a 25.4% mindshare in E, compared to TIBCO’s 4.5% mindshare. Additionally, 86% of Salesforce users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of TIBCO users who would recommend it.
Mule ESB
Read 49 Mule ESB reviews
  • 5,021 Views
  • 4,168 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Read 12 TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reviews
  • 923 Views
  • 704 Comparison Views
92% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between Mule ESB and TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 824,067 peers since 2012
 

Categories and Ranking

Mule ESB
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
2nd
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
49
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Ranking in Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
10th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) category, the mindshare of Mule ESB is 25.4%, up from 24.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is 4.5%, up from 4.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Enterprise Service Bus (ESB)
 

Featured Reviews

PurbayanSaha - PeerSpot reviewer
Has API-led architecture and provides a unique, user-friendly, and scalable architecture for hosting APIs
There's room for improvement in multi-file transfer functionality. It's not convenient when using MuleSoft, and it should have better capability for handling large amounts of data. For example, applications like GoAnywhere can handle huge chunks of data, so the tool should also have something to facilitate that aspect of integration.
Read full review
Mustofa Yonus - PeerSpot reviewer
A robust product that needs to improve the functionality it offers related to API lifecycle management
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a six to seven out of ten. My company consists of around 7000 employees, and we use the solution as an integrated service in around 300 to 400 systems, both internally and externally, making it a huge number. Our company uses the solution every minute and every second, and we can't function without it.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The connectivity the solution provides is excellent. There are often too many systems that we have to integrate and this helps with that."
"Mule Expression Language"
"Once it is started, we don't see any problems on a day to day basis."
"Mule ESB is a very easy-to-use and user-friendly solution."
"The solution offers multiple deployment options."
"I like that it's user-friendly. Compared to other ESBs, I find it easier to use. I like it better than other ESBs. I like the connectors, which make calling the APIs through the routers easier."
"Everything runs in Java, which is a useful feature."
"Most of our use cases are for Salesforce. So, the connectors for Salesforce have been really helpful. They've made development two times faster."
More Mule ESB pros
"It's very stable and reliable."
"The stability of this solution is excellent."
"The GUI and IDE features of this solution are easy to work with and to develop. We find application management easy using this solution. It is a stable product"
"It is easy to develop. It has a very wide range of features. The older versions are very stable, and there are no issues with the product."
"TIBCO has the platform in terms of speed and ease of use."
"The solution is very stable."
"The most valuable feature is that it is a service-oriented architecture, SOA-based."
"The most attractive and beneficial feature is the ease of development."
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus pros
 

Cons

"There are limitations with the subscription model that comes with the product."
"We would like the ability to use our own code. This would allow us to develop customizations with ease. Additionally, it would be nice to have more analytics or insights on the exchanged information between databases."
"From the product perspective, it was sometimes hard to manage the dependencies. When we had to add dependencies on a couple of different packages, it was sometimes confusing. It was hard to update them with Anypoint Studio, as well as with MuleSoft. There were challenges with that. So, that's one of the areas that could be improved."
"I would like to see support for BPM in the next release of this solution."
"It would be much more beneficial if the solution included AI and business process management."
"MuleSoft is not so strong in method-based integration, so they're not so functional in that regard."
"The price of Mule ESB could improve."
"The initial setup could be more straightforward."
More Mule ESB cons
"I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors."
"If TIBCO could be able to sort the size of their base image in the Container edition, it would be really marvelous. Right now it's around 299 MB. We'd really want it to reduce to a few MBs."
"We'd like to see improvements in product support."
"In the next release, there should be improvements made to the API manager."
"The stability of their latest version is not on par with their classic version 5.X."
"The initial setup process could be easier."
"Migration to cloud solutions or products should be made convenient, transparent, and easily understandable."
"The solution is very expensive when you use multiple components, it would b better if this could be reduced."
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Most of the challenges that I had with this solution were for smaller customers. There is not a good licensing model or pricing model. It is more expensive than other solutions, and that's the downside of MuleSoft. I had to be creative to be able to sell it to the business, but we did. This is something they have to work on because for large companies, it's affordable, but for small and medium businesses, it's very hard to sell."
"I think the price is very high. If you use TIBCO BW, the license is for the CPU usage, then the IPS, and support. I also think the license for the product is a one-time expense."
"The licensing is yearly, and there are additional fees for services."
"You will not get any support from Mule ESB's team for the tool's community edition...You can get support with the licensed version of Mule ESB."
"The various features and components for this solution are no longer free."
"Regarding licensing and pricing, I find it somewhat flexible. They are more flexible with larger customers compared to small and medium ones, as their licensing model depends on ports and other factors. Large customers benefit from more flexibility in implementation and renewal compared to smaller ones."
"The price of the Mule ESB commercial version is expensive. However, they have a free community version."
"The pricing must be improved."
More Mule ESB pricing and cost advice
"Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive."
"The biggest issue disadvantage of TIBCO is that it is expensive."
"When it comes to cost, TIBCO is much more competitive than a product like Pega."
"The licensing cost is a challenge for quite a few customers."
"Its licensing cost is considerably high as compared to other ESBs."
"The price is on the higher side. For the same price, if I go to the previous version, I would have got a lot more capacity with similar kinds of features."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
26%
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Migration from IBM Integration Bus to Mulesoft ESB for a large enterprise tech services company
I was previously part of the Oracle SOA/OSB development team. In my current capacity I architected solutions using MuleSoft Anypoint Platform on cloud / on-premises and hybrid modes and on PCE/RTF ...
See all answers
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB - which to choose?
Our team ran a comparison of IBM’s Integration Bus vs. Mule ESB in order to determine what sort of ESB software was the best fit for our organization. Ultimately we decided to choose IBM Integratio...
See all answers
What do you like most about Mule ESB?
The solution's drag-and-drop interface and data viewer helped us quite a lot.
See all answers
What do you like most about TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?
The most valuable feature of the solution is that the performance is robust.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?
Price-wise, I would say that the product is expensive.
See all answers
What needs improvement with TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus?
I don't like the product's API management platform, as it doesn't offer users enough functionality to help with API lifecycle management, making it a product that is way behind its competitors. The...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 33% of the time
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle Service Bus vs Mule ESB
Compared 12% of the time
webMethods.io vs Mule ESB Logo
webMethods.io vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB Logo
Oracle SOA Suite vs Mule ESB
Compared 7% of the time
JBoss ESB vs Mule ESB Logo
JBoss ESB vs Mule ESB
Compared 2% of the time
More Mule ESB Competitors
IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Logo
IBM Integration Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Compared 51% of the time
Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Logo
Oracle Service Bus vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Compared 20% of the time
Red Hat Fuse vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Logo
Red Hat Fuse vs TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Compared 11% of the time
More TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Mule ESB
December 2024
Mule ESB reportDownload Mule ESB product report
Buyer's Guide
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
November 2024
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus reportDownload TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus product report
 

Also Known As

No data available
ActiveMatrix Service Bus
 

Learn More

Salesforce
TIBCO
 

Overview

For companies looking to modernize and unlock the value of existing on-premises systems and applications, an enterprise service bus (ESB) architecture serves as a critical foundation layer for SOA. When deployed as an ESB, the Mule runtime engine of Anypoint Platform combines the power of data and application integration across legacy systems and SaaS applications, with a seamless path to the other capabilities of Anypoint Platform and the full power of API-led connectivity.
TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a platform for developing, deploying, and managing applications that conform to a service-oriented architecture. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus is a lightweight enterprise service bus that helps organizations bridge the mediation gap in their SOA infrastructure. It reduces complexity and increases flexibility and reuse by replacing hard-coded service dependencies with configuration, and can be used to onboard services from a third-party environment or a TIBCO-based infrastructure. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus provides service mediation capabilities to the TIBCO ActiveMatrix SOA platform. Service mediation allows you to adapt to changing requirements for developing mediation flows.
 

Sample Customers

Ube, PacificComp, University of Witwatersrand, Justice Systems, Camelot
Colonial Life, CTBC Bank, New World Mobility, QUALCOMM, Swisscom Mobile, T-Mobile USA, Tata Teleservices, Telecom Italia
Buyer's Guide
Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
December 2024
Free Report: Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus
Find out what your peers are saying about Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Mule ESB vs. TIBCO ActiveMatrix Service Bus report.
See our list of best Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) vendors.

We monitor all Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.