MySQL vs SAP IQ comparison

Oracle and SAP are both solutions in the Relational Databases Tools category. Oracle is ranked #3 with an average rating of 8.6, while SAP is ranked #26 with an average rating of 7.7. Oracle holds a 8.5% mindshare in SQL, compared to SAP’s 0.7% mindshare. Additionally, 91% of Oracle users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 84% of SAP users who would recommend it.

MySQL

Read 148 MySQL reviews

7,193 Views
5,585 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

SAP IQ

Read 21 SAP IQ reviews

364 Views
264 Comparison Views

84% willing to recommend

MySQL

SAP IQ

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

SAP IQ and MySQL compete in the data management and business intelligence sector. SAP IQ may have an edge with its high query speed and data compression, ideal for large datasets.

Features: SAP IQ utilizes a columnar architecture to focus on query speed and data compression, offering high performance in data warehousing environments. This makes it well-suited for managing large datasets efficiently. MySQL, with its open-source model, supports various applications through its robust compatibility with programming languages and scalability. While MySQL is broadly applicable, SAP IQ is optimized for rapid data processing and compression.

Room for Improvement: SAP IQ could enhance its market presence and integrate more global support, as its underutilization is noted. Improvements in real-time analytics and enhanced backup options are needed for MySQL. The need for an improved user experience and better scalability options are also highlighted for MySQL.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: SAP IQ primarily deploys on-premises with mixed customer service experiences, including response delays. MySQL supports deployment across various cloud options and boasts a large community support network, although paid support quality can vary.

Pricing and ROI: SAP IQ's pricing, though high, is justified by its feature breadth, making it a worthwhile investment for high-performance needs. MySQL's open-source nature results in lower initial costs, attractive for startups, with possible investments in enterprise editions for advanced features justified by their capabilities.

To learn more, read our detailed MySQL vs. SAP IQ Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 846,617 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

ROI

Sentiment score

6.6

Quantifying MySQL ROI is challenging due to variable costs, but users report high return and cost-effectiveness without licensing fees.

Sentiment score

7.0

SAP IQ offers a high ROI with low implementation costs and significant hardware savings, despite some users not tracking exact returns.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Customer Service

Sentiment score

6.8

MySQL users rely heavily on community support, with mixed reviews on paid support due to cost and variable responsiveness.

Sentiment score

5.6

SAP IQ's service is mixed, with good global support but issues with expertise, staff shortages, and inefficient initial responses.

We have no issues and usually receive timely responses.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score

6.8

MySQL scales well for small to medium databases but may face challenges with horizontal scaling in larger datasets.

Sentiment score

7.4

SAP IQ excels in scalability, with easy expansion, though some multiplex architecture limitations are noted by users.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Stability Issues

Sentiment score

7.7

MySQL is highly stable and reliable, praised for ease of integration and requiring proper resources for optimal performance.

Sentiment score

6.1

SAP IQ's stability has improved, handling high data volumes well, despite occasional issues in earlier versions under high load.

We face certain integration issues, especially when we integrate the database with security solutions like IBM QRadar.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Room For Improvement

MySQL struggles with performance, scalability, and ease of use, needing improvements in tools, features, backup, and system integration.

SAP IQ needs better integration, stability, training, and affordability to overcome awareness and concurrency issues, enhancing user appeal.

It could be more beneficial if MySQL can enhance its data masking functionality in the same way it has improved data encryption.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Setup Cost

MySQL offers free and enterprise editions, with flexible licensing and cost-effective options for diverse business needs and support.

SAP IQ offers cost-effective licensing options and economical implementation, ideal for large databases needing partitioning and performance evaluation.

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Valuable Features

MySQL offers cost-effective, reliable, and scalable performance with extensive support, flexibility, and advanced features for versatile applications.

SAP IQ provides fast query processing, data compression, and scalability, ideal for BI with high data demands and user concurrency.

With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment.

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

For more quotes and insights, download the MySQL report

No quotes available

For more quotes and insights, download the SAP IQ report

Categories and Ranking

MySQL

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

3rd

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.4

Number of Reviews

148

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (1st)

SAP IQ

Ranking in Relational Databases Tools

26th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Data Warehouse (13th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Relational Databases Tools category, the mindshare of MySQL is 8.5%, down from 8.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP IQ is 0.7%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Relational Databases Tools

Featured Reviews

Muzzamil Hussain

Assistant Vice President at National Bank of Pakistan

Native encryption ensures secure data management with a simple deployment

The most valuable feature is the on-premises data encryption facilities. By default, we can provide encryption, and this feature in MySQL is why we prefer it over other databases. The native encryption in MySQL encourages us to use this database model more frequently compared to Oracle and other databases. With Oracle, we have to buy another solution for encryption and masking, but MySQL supports native encryption, which enhances our return on investment. It perfectly supports our ROI, and we have no issues with its functionality.

Read full review

Tejas Raj

Manager at Capgemini

Columnar database, so pulling records is easy but there isn't enough documentation for installation

I've seen very few SAP IQ systems in recent years. So people are moving away from SAP IQ In the last three years, I've rarely encountered customers using it. Fewer systems with SAP IQ usage among our customers. Most of them have moved on to HANA. There are parallel products, and there are also viable alternatives from AWS, so many have migrated to those.

Read full review

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Relational Databases Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

16%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Financial Services Firm

45%

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

Why are MySQL connections encrypted and what is the biggest benefit of this?

MySQL encrypts connections to protect your data and the biggest benefit from this is that nobody can corrupt it. If you move information over a network without encryption, you are endangering it, m...

See all answers

Considering that there is a free version of MySQL, would you invest in one of the paid editions?

I may be considered a MySQL veteran since I have been using it since before Oracle bought it and created paid versions. So back in my day, it was all free, it was open-source and the best among sim...

See all answers

What is one thing you would improve with MySQL?

One thing I would improve related to MySQL is not within the product itself, but with the guides to it. Before, when it was free, everyone was on their own, seeking tutorials and how-to videos onli...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SAP IQ?

IQ implementation costs about three thousand dollars. It's less expensive compared to alternatives like Teradata Base in terms of transactional efficiency.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SAP IQ?

The primary negative aspect is the cost, which can be a challenge due to the economic conditions in Peru.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for SAP IQ?

I worked on implementing new databases, migration data in production, and developer environments with SAP IQ.

See all answers

Comparisons

Firebird SQL vs MySQL

Compared 28% of the time

PostgreSQL vs MySQL

Compared 15% of the time

SAP HANA vs MySQL

Compared 8% of the time

MariaDB vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

Teradata vs MySQL

Compared 6% of the time

More MySQL Competitors

Snowflake vs SAP IQ

Compared 31% of the time

SAP HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 15% of the time

SQL Server vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

Apache Hadoop vs SAP IQ

Compared 12% of the time

SAP BW4HANA vs SAP IQ

Compared 9% of the time

More SAP IQ Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

MySQL

March 2025

Download MySQL product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP IQ

March 2025

Download SAP IQ product report

Also Known As

No data available

Sybase IQ

Overview

MySQL is a cost-efficient and scalable relational database management system widely used in web, mobile applications, and academic projects.

MySQL is utilized for backend operations, data analysis, reporting, financial transactions, and ERP databases. It supports deployment on local servers, Cloud, and Kubernetes. Its free, open-source nature along with strong community support make it popular among companies. MySQL's compatibility with multiple platforms and programming languages enhances its appeal. While it remains stable and easy to use, areas such as replication, clustering, and backup require improvement to better serve enterprise applications. Enhanced security, error messages, and monitoring tools are also desired for a better user experience.

What are the most important features of MySQL?

Free and Open-Source: No licensing costs, perfect for budget-conscious projects.
Compatibility: Works with multiple platforms and programming languages.
High Performance: Efficient performance across large datasets.
Scalability: Easily scales to meet growing business needs.
Clustering and Replication: Ensures data availability and redundancy.
Easy Installation: Quick setup process on various operating systems.
Community Support: Extensive resources and community assistance.
Cross-Platform: Operates seamlessly on different operating systems.
Data Management Interface: Simplifies data handling and manipulation.

What are the benefits of using MySQL?

Cost Efficiency: Reduce expenses with a free, open-source database.
Scalability: Adapt to increasing data demands effortlessly.
Performance: Handle large datasets with ease and speed.
Community Support: Access a vast pool of knowledge and resources.
Flexibility: Integrate with various platforms and languages for diverse use cases.
Data Reliability: Clustering and replication for high data availability.

In multiple industries, MySQL supports internal applications, billing systems, academic teaching purposes, and ERP databases. Companies leverage MySQL for Cloud and local deployments, ensuring effective data manipulation and backend operations in diverse projects. Its role in financial transactions and reporting further emphasizes its versatility.

Oracle

SAP® IQ software delivers speed and power for extreme-scale enterprise data warehousing and analytics. Its column-oriented, grid-based massively parallel processing (MPP) architecture and patented data compression and indexing technologies enable companies to exploit the value of huge amounts of data at the speed of business.

SAP

Sample Customers

Facebook, Tumblr, Scholastic, MTV Networks, Wikipedia, Verizon Wireless, Sage Group, Glassfish Open Message Queue, and RightNow Technologies.

ASR Group, Citrix, State of Indiana, PocketCard Co. Ltd.

Buyer's Guide

MySQL vs. SAP IQ

April 2025

Free Report: MySQL vs. SAP IQ

Find out what your peers are saying about MySQL vs. SAP IQ and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

846,617 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our MySQL vs. SAP IQ report.

See our list of best Relational Databases Tools vendors.

We monitor all Relational Databases Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.