Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nagios Core vs Splunk AppDynamics comparison

Nagios and Splunk are both solutions in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category. Nagios is ranked #11 with an average rating of 8.0, while Splunk is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.4. Nagios holds a 3.7% mindshare in IM, compared to Splunk’s 3.3% mindshare. Additionally, 80% of Nagios users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Splunk users who would recommend it.
Nagios Core
Read 51 Nagios Core reviews
  • 4,301 Views
  • 3,307 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
Splunk AppDynamics
Read 245 Splunk AppDynamics reviews
  • 5,824 Views
  • 3,684 Comparison Views
91% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 6, 2025

AppDynamics and Nagios Core are competitors in the application and infrastructure monitoring category. AppDynamics has the upper hand with advanced application-centric features and strong ROI, whereas Nagios Core stands out for its cost-effectiveness and strong infrastructure monitoring capabilities.

Features: AppDynamics is favored for its abilities in deep transaction analysis, real-time insights, and workflow mapping, providing robust tools for managing application performance. Its comprehensive transaction tracking helps identify and resolve issues effectively. Meanwhile, Nagios Core provides solid infrastructure monitoring, harnessing extensibility to monitor various endpoints, and offers reliable alert features even without extensive application-centric functionalities.

Room for Improvement: AppDynamics could enhance integration with AI tools to stay competitive, improve support for emerging databases, and refine its agent-based architecture to minimize potential performance bottlenecks. Conversely, Nagios Core could benefit from an updated user interface and a more intuitive configuration process to align with contemporary enterprise solutions and ease deployment complexities.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: AppDynamics provides versatile deployment options across multiple cloud environments complemented by a strong customer support team, although some users have noted room for improvement following corporate changes. On the other hand, Nagios Core's deployment is primarily on-premises, offering flexibility and a strong community-driven support base but lacks the robust customer service framework provided by AppDynamics.

Pricing and ROI: AppDynamics is a premium solution with high licensing fees but is often justified by its substantial ROI in complex environments due to operational savings and enhanced performance. Nagios Core, being open-source, is cost-effective with negligible financial outlay, providing excellent value, especially for organizations focused on infrastructure monitoring.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,207 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
8.8
Nagios Core reduces downtime and costs with quick alerts, providing full ROI and eliminating expensive monitoring tools.
Sentiment score
7.3
Splunk AppDynamics enhances app performance, customer experience, and efficiency, offering quick ROI, cost reductions, and operational improvements.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
5.1
Nagios Core relies on community support, praised for stability and resources, but lacks official help compared to Nagios XI.
Sentiment score
7.3
Splunk AppDynamics support is praised for knowledge and engagement, despite occasional response time and geographical challenges.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
The customer service and support are helpful and responsive.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
6.7
Nagios Core shows scalability for large networks but may need customizations and integrations for distributed environments.
Sentiment score
7.4
Splunk AppDynamics is praised for scalability across environments, though pricing and large deployments pose occasional challenges.
The solution is scalable.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
We have reached maximum capacity in our tier, and extending capacity has not been cost-effective from Splunk's perspective.
I did not find any Docker solution available with it, and a separate instance has to be installed.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
HY
reviewer2674446 - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Nagios Core is highly stable and reliable with minimal footprint, supporting extensive monitoring without network burden.
Sentiment score
7.7
Splunk AppDynamics offers strong stability and high performance, with minimal downtime and excellent support despite occasional issues.
I tried many other solutions at work, however, in terms of Nagios, I haven't seen any disruption or downtime.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
It is necessary to conduct appropriate testing before deploying them in production to prevent potential outages.
I can rate it nine out of ten.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
HY
reviewer2674446 - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Room For Improvement

Nagios Core needs a more intuitive interface, better scalability, and features like enhanced reporting and integration with modern tools.
Splunk AppDynamics requires improvements in interface design, setup, mobile compatibility, real-time monitoring, and modern technology support.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
Splunk AppDynamics provides an end-to-end view of the application but misses the infrastructure part, which is crucial.
If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
 

Setup Cost

Nagios Core is a free, cost-effective open-source tool, but requires Linux expertise and incurs hosting and maintenance costs.
Enterprise users find Splunk AppDynamics pricing complex and costly, requiring careful assessment and negotiation for better deals.
No quotes available
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
Customers have to pay a premium price, however, they receive considerable value from the product.
All these solutions at the moment are cheap, but it is like paying for insurance; you pay insurance to avoid major damage.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
 

Valuable Features

Nagios Core provides flexible, low-resource monitoring with customization, automation, efficient alerts, and integration support for reliable IT performance visibility.
Splunk AppDynamics offers comprehensive observability, real-time monitoring, and efficient transaction analysis across development and production environments with minimal overhead.
It has a very handy dashboard, providing live alerts and visibility for everything.
For more quotes and insights, download the Nagios Core report
What I like the most about Splunk AppDynamics is the end-to-end observability for the application, along with traces.
The feature that I appreciate in AppDynamics Browser Real-User Monitoring is the intuitive and user-friendly dynamic mapping it creates for workflows.
The real-time feature provides me with insights into what's happening.
For more quotes and insights, download the Splunk AppDynamics report
HY
reviewer2674446 - PeerSpot reviewerMuhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewerOluwatoyin Deinde - PeerSpot reviewer
 

Categories and Ranking

Nagios Core
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
11th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.0
Number of Reviews
51
Ranking in other categories
Network Monitoring Software (8th)
Splunk AppDynamics
Ranking in IT Infrastructure Monitoring
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
245
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (3rd), IT Operations Analytics (2nd), Mobile APM (2nd), Container Monitoring (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the IT Infrastructure Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nagios Core is 3.7%, up from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Splunk AppDynamics is 3.3%, down from 4.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
IT Infrastructure Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Nishith-Vyas - PeerSpot reviewer
Valuable reporting and alert system with room for PDF export improvements
The NetEase reporting structure needs improvement, especially the availability report, which is weak. It should be generated automatically with minimal human intervention and should be exportable as a PDF. Besides that, an integrated PDF export feature for reports is necessary. Also, the alert mechanism and graphing mechanism need to be integrated properly into Nagios Core. Currently, integrating these requires advanced Linux knowledge. Integration of more visualization tools like Grafana and Prometheus for better graphing and visualization is also recommended.
Read full review
Muhammad Zeeshan Siddiqui - PeerSpot reviewer
Dynamic mapping enhances workflows that are user-friendly
One aspect that requires improvement is the agent. Without an agent, gathering sufficient information on applications is challenging. Additionally, the agent sometimes creates performance issues in production environments. If AppDynamics could develop a means to monitor without an agent, it could significantly improve application performance and reduce potential problems. Moving to an agentless solution, like what some competitors are doing, would be beneficial.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which IT Infrastructure Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Educational Organization
48%
Financial Services Firm
16%
Computer Software Company
9%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nagios Core?
What I like about Nagios Core is that it helps me ensure everything is running smoothly by checking the status of hosts and services.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nagios Core?
Nagios Core is a free and open-source product. We don't charge for the product itself, but we charge for the man-hour costs related to installation, configuration, ongoing operation, and maintenance.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nagios Core?
The dashboard should be improved. It's very simple. I don't have a very clear or specific suggestion. You can change the skin of the dashboard, however, it's good for me.
See all answers
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
See all answers
APM tools for a Managed Service Provider - Dynatrace vs. AppDynamics vs. Aternity vs. Ruxit
Hi Avi! It's great to see your thorough approach to selecting an APM package for your MSP company. Considering your focus on SMBs and enterprises in Israel, Dynatrace seems like a solid choice with...
See all answers
What do you like most about AppDynamics?
The solution saves time and cost.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Icinga vs Nagios Core Logo
Icinga vs Nagios Core
Compared 27% of the time
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core Logo
Nagios XI vs Nagios Core
Compared 18% of the time
Zabbix vs Nagios Core Logo
Zabbix vs Nagios Core
Compared 14% of the time
Centreon vs Nagios Core Logo
Centreon vs Nagios Core
Compared 9% of the time
OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core Logo
OP5 Monitor vs Nagios Core
Compared 4% of the time
More Nagios Core Competitors
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Dynatrace vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 15% of the time
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Datadog vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 10% of the time
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Splunk Enterprise Security vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 8% of the time
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
New Relic vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 7% of the time
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics Logo
Grafana vs Splunk AppDynamics
Compared 6% of the time
More Splunk AppDynamics Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core
March 2025
Nagios Core reportDownload Nagios Core product report
Buyer's Guide
Splunk AppDynamics
March 2025
Splunk AppDynamics reportDownload Splunk AppDynamics product report
 

Overview

This is IT infrastructure monitoring's industry-standard, open-source core. Free without professional support services.

Nagios

Splunk AppDynamics enhances application performance monitoring with advanced diagnostics and real-time insights, offering seamless end-to-end transaction tracking and infrastructure visibility.

AppDynamics provides critical tools for businesses to analyze application behavior and performance. Through innovative features like transaction snapshot analysis and adaptable dashboards, users can quickly identify and address issues, ensuring high levels of system uptime and efficiency. It is designed to support complex environments including Kubernetes and AWS, enhancing user experience by detecting performance issues early. Despite needing improvements in network monitoring and integration, it remains a robust option for tracking application health.

What are the key features of AppDynamics?
  • Real-time Performance Monitoring: Offers immediate insights into application behavior.
  • Business Transaction Tracking: Tracks transactions from start to finish for bottleneck identification.
  • JVM Memory Monitoring: Provides detailed JVM metrics and memory use information.
  • Deep-dive Diagnostics: Enables in-depth analysis of code and stack traces.
  • Adaptable Dashboards: Customizable views for better data interpretation.
How does AppDynamics benefit users?
  • Improved Incident Resolution: Faster problem detection and solution implementation.
  • Enhanced Application Performance: Real-time monitoring optimizes system operations.
  • Comprehensive Visibility: Provides a full view of application infrastructure.
  • Informed Decision Making: Detailed analytics guide performance improvements.
  • Customer Satisfaction: Enhances user experience through faster issue resolutions.

In industries like financial services and e-commerce, AppDynamics facilitates performance tracking across distributed systems, optimizing infrastructure to meet consumer demands. It excels in environments needing precise transaction monitoring and is pivotal in delivering high value and satisfaction.

Splunk
 

Sample Customers

Airbnb, Cisco, PayPal, FanDuel
Cisco, Sony, Nasdaq, Reserve Bank of New Zealand, Edmunds.com, Puma, Fox News, DirecTV, Pizza Hut, T-Systems, Cornell University, OpenTable, BITMARCK, Green Mountain Power, Care.com, Overstock, Paddy Power, eHarmony, Kraft, The Motley Fool, The Container Store, and more See more customers
Buyer's Guide
Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics
April 2025
Free Report: Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics
Find out what your peers are saying about Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,207 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nagios Core vs. Splunk AppDynamics report.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.