

HPE Zerto Software and NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP are leading competitors in the disaster recovery and cloud storage domain. While HPE Zerto Software is favored for its competitive pricing and excellent support, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP gains an edge with its superior feature set.
Features: HPE Zerto Software offers near real-time continuous disaster recovery, easy orchestration for file recovery, and integration with VMware environments. Additionally, its hardware-agnostic nature and user-friendly interface simplify management and ensure minimal data loss. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP excels with its SnapMirror data replication, superior storage efficiency, and seamless integration with hybrid cloud environments offering users the ability to manage SAN and NAS data within a single solution.
Room for Improvement: HPE Zerto Software could enhance scalability in large environments, improve native cloud integration, and expand support for non-VMware hypervisors. NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP could benefit from improved snapshot management, enhanced native cloud service integration, and reduced costs associated with cloud operations.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE Zerto Software is praised for easy deployment and robust support services, achieving smooth implementation experiences for users. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP offers flexible deployment with scalable options and reliable customer service to assist clients in multi-cloud deployments.
Pricing and ROI: HPE Zerto Software provides competitive pricing, enabling a promising ROI due to its lower initial setup cost and effective disaster recovery capabilities. Conversely, NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP may require a higher upfront investment but delivers a high ROI with robust data management, compression, and storage efficiency features.
Before, it was a huge cost. It was several thousand dollars to do a DR test, whereas now, I click a button.
It saves us a lot of time and gives us the ability to perform other DR plans for other systems.
It's not only in the cloud; it's DR as a service, which means that the recovery operations are performed by a dedicated team specializing in this area.
I have never had an issue that was not resolved, and I have never been in a situation where they did not respond.
I would give them a rating of ten because it represents the highest level of support based on the technical knowledge of the support team, response time, and effectiveness of the provided resolutions.
When I open a ticket, I usually get a call within an hour or two.
I would rate it a ten out of ten for scalability.
Customers need to follow good engineering practices for optimal product use.
By adding more hosts and installing VRAs on each, tasks can be efficiently managed.
It wouldn't help with outages either; the scaling is manual, and there are no processes we've used to automate that for unexpected scenarios.
I promptly delete the malfunctioning elements and set them up again to resume replication, ensuring stability.
The ease of use was so good with Zerto that they were able to migrate things much quicker.
It is very reliable.
If I have 350 objects that I am protecting, I would like Zerto to be able to fire them up in one order, rather than having to manually bring them up in a sequence.
If the host has a lot of VMs on it, there may not always be enough time to relocate all of the VMs from a protection group standpoint to other hosts before the replication appliance that Zerto uses to manage that powers itself down.
If HPE Zerto Software has it built-in where we're going to vCenter and you click on it, it will build the VPG and indicate configuration requirements, that would be amazing.
My opinion is that support is generally very good. There are instances where they take longer to respond or resolve issues, especially when customers have urgent needs, but ultimately, resolution is achieved.
It would be nice to see technology supporting the Elastic Fabric Adapter on Amazon AWS, therefore getting RDMA technology for more low-latency connections.
If you want a good-quality tool that is robust and does a good job for you, you have to pay a higher price to get that, and Zerto is no different.
However, it can become quite expensive when you start looking at the number of workloads you have in the environment and what you would like to do.
Zerto is easier to set up and use, and it's less expensive.
Zerto offers excellent technical support with responsive and helpful experts.
If we were attacked, I could revert to a backup from five seconds before the attack, and no one would know we were attacked.
The replication time and the minor amount of time it takes to sync a new server outside of any of my huge 40-terabyte boxes is ridiculously quick.
The granular ability to divide up the performance and the amount of storage you want is really fantastic.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| HPE Zerto Software | 6.2% |
| NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP | 7.4% |
| Other | 86.4% |

| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 92 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 86 |
| Large Enterprise | 194 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 8 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 11 |
| Large Enterprise | 53 |
Zerto is used for disaster recovery, business continuity, data migration, and ransomware recovery, providing continuous data protection and near real-time replication. Valued for ease of use, efficient failover processes, and versatile integration, it enhances organizational efficiency, reduces errors, and boosts productivity.
NetApp Cloud Volumes ONTAP is an efficient storage management solution for managing and storing data in the cloud. It offers seamless integration with cloud providers, advanced data replication capabilities, and high data protection. With reliable performance, it is ideal for industries like healthcare and finance.
We monitor all Cloud Migration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.