We performed a comparison between NetApp FAS Series and Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution is very stable and reliable"
"You can use different protocols at the same time. Monitoring is also very easy in NetApp FAS Series. There is a free tool for monitoring."
"It changed the way we do Disaster Recovery (DR) around NetApp replication."
"I have found all the features useful in NetApp FAS Series."
"The SnapMirror is a good tool because, as long as you're going NetApp to NetApp, it's ultimately the fastest way to move data. We replicate everything to another site for disaster recovery."
"Good for NAS and unified solutions."
"We can manage our applications from a single dashboard."
"Can use both SAN and NAS at the same time."
"I like its storage capacity, quick access to the data, speed, and overall storage management."
"The high cost of the product is an area of concern, so from an improvement perspective, the tool needs to be made cheaper."
"The product must support more drives."
"The user interface could be improved."
"The adoption of flash by NetApp has also been lagging behind the trendsetters, like TMS, Nimble, and others."
"We no longer have OEM support in South Africa which is not helpful, it can be difficult. They should add an office back to the country because it was better."
"The only downside is in ease in management; it is not easy to use."
"The solution could do more than just data."
"The product should improve its user experience."
"The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem."
More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Pricing and Cost Advice →
Earn 20 points
NetApp FAS Series is ranked 1st in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) with 98 reviews while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is ranked 9th in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network). NetApp FAS Series is rated 8.8, while Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of NetApp FAS Series writes "Offers good performance and ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance writes "A stable unified storage system that enables quick access to data". NetApp FAS Series is most compared with Dell PowerScale (Isilon), NetApp AFF, HPE StorageWorks MSA, Dell PowerProtect DD (Data Domain) and Dell Unity XT, whereas Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is most compared with Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI), IBM FlashSystem, Hitachi Virtual Storage Platform, HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE StorageWorks MSA. See our NetApp FAS Series vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance report.
See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.
We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.