HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance comparison

Why PeerSpot?

Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Oracle are both solutions in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category. Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.8, while Oracle is ranked #9. Hewlett Packard Enterprise holds a 12.9% mindshare in MS, compared to Oracle’s 6.0% mindshare. Additionally, 94% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Read 304 HPE 3PAR StoreServ reviews

16,773 Views
4,361 Comparison Views

94% willing to recommend

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Read 2 Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance reviews

1,144 Views
1,041 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 2, 2025

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance and HPE 3PAR StoreServ provide enterprise storage solutions. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance leads in pricing and customer support, while HPE 3PAR StoreServ is preferred for its feature set.

Features: Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is known for its hybrid storage, advanced analytics, and data insight. HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers scalability, high performance, and customization options.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance ensures straightforward installation and strong support. HPE 3PAR StoreServ features rapid deployment and superior integration services for complex infrastructures.

Pricing and ROI: Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance has an attractive initial setup cost providing good ROI. HPE 3PAR StoreServ, though more costly at first, offers substantial ROI over time due to durability and advanced features.

To learn more, read our detailed HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Report (Updated: August 2026).

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

August 2026

Download the complete report

Helped 911,436 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

2nd

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

304

Ranking in other categories

NAS (7th), All-Flash Storage (11th)

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appl...

Ranking in Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

9th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of August 2026, in the Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) category, the mindshare of HPE 3PAR StoreServ is 12.9%, up from 10.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is 6.0%, up from 4.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) Mindshare Distribution
Product	Mindshare (%)
HPE 3PAR StoreServ	12.9%
Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance	6.0%
Other	81.1%

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

Featured Reviews

Muhammad Saqib

System Engineer at Hybrid Tech

Uninterrupted upgrades accelerate performance with good support

I would rate the solution eight out of ten. It should be noted that in Pakistan, some parts are not readily available, and we need to import them from Singapore or other countries. We encountered an issue with a customer where the midplane failed and was not available. We had to wait for several days for a replacement, even in a 24/7 support case. Additionally, we faced motherboard failures in the customer's environment, encountering two motherboard failures simultaneously. We obtained one motherboard immediately, yet had to wait ten days for another. These issues should have been resolved promptly given the 24/7 support level.

Read full review

RobertMakale

IT Consultant at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees

A stable unified storage system that enables quick access to data

The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The performance is pretty good and the usability is excellent."

"Before using centralized storage, we needed to make sure that we have enough physical disks installed in a server, now we know exactly the capacity that we need for the upcoming year, and it's much easier for us to enlarge the capacity and expose these disk volumes to the relevant servers."

"3PAR's ease-of-use has really improved our functioning because it requires less administration and less tuning."

"The technical support has been fantastic."

"It's a very attractive product that is easy to use and deploy."

"We have more uptime, better trade times, and less hassle opening tickets with HPE."

"Resilience and reliability, unmatched. They take good care of us."

"The command line is very extensive, a lot of tools so in comparison to other vendors. It's one of the great things about 3PAR, that you can really drill down on performance, get statistics, really know how your system is internally performing."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pros

"I like its storage capacity, quick access to the data, speed, and overall storage management."

"Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is a very stable and durable product that's very strong and mature."

"Very good analytics Very easy to configure."

Cons

"From my point of view, the part of this product that needs improvement is the reporting."

"I would like an easier user interface and setup to help with deployment."

"We had some issues, now they are resolved, but one issue existed for a year."

"HPE gives you how to get everything going, but it would be nice if they could go a little deeper sometimes. That is always the case: To get the value-add, you have to pay for those services."

"We've got some issues at the moment on scalability. We need to grow our data quite significantly."

"I would like to see an automatic re-balancing system or functionality for adaptive optimization."

"It increased performance for a while, but then, as we grew, and we did not grow significantly, performance dropped down."

"We had some initial hardware problems that gave us a bad taste."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ cons

"Uptime. We had some crashes here and there."

"The main thing Oracle can improve is the cost. It would be better if Oracle opened up the system to enable integration with other vendors. Whether it's the database, application server, or storage appliance, they should make it easy to integrate them. They need to open up more to ensure that it can work in any environment and IT ecosystem."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The support for the solution is free for three years, then it is an additional cost. It is approximately $30,000 annually. The price includes a lot of equipment we have not only HPE 3PAR StoreServ."

"I rate the tool's pricing an eight out of ten. It is expensive."

"3PAR was quite a bit less money than EMC, and that was one of the deciding factors."

"HPE 3PAR StoreServ is an expensive solution."

"It's very reliable and it was cost competitive with other arrays at the time that we purchased it."

"You can't get software maintenance from a third party. You have to do it from HPE, which is a letdown."

"We paid for five years of support when we purchased the product."

"It's a good price."

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ pricing and cost advice

"The price could be better. We have many competing products now like Huawei and Dell EMC, and these are slightly cheaper."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

911,436 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Comparison Review

it_user182013

Federal Civ/Intel Engineering Lead at a tech vendor with 1,001-5,000 employees

May 1, 2015

Measuring Up: EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR

Leading up to EMC World 2015, IT Central Station asked how I would compare EMC XtremIO and HP 3PAR. Until recently, the flash storage conversation in my organization and many others has centered on XtremIO and Pure Storage, the leaders of the all-flash array (AFA) space. To that end, I've written a…

Read full review

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Construction Company

12%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Outsourcing Company

11%

Manufacturing Company

Construction Company

12%

Healthcare Company

Insurance Company

Computer Software Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

By reviewers
Company Size	Count
Small Business	73
Midsize Enterprise	74
Large Enterprise	170

No data available

Questions from the Community

What's the difference between HPE 3PAR StoreServ and HPE Primera?

HPE Primera has many great features but one of the best is that it is very easy to deploy. From an overall perspective, it is reliable, easy to set up, stable, and offers quality block storage. All...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

As a customer, I always prefer to have a lower price. Any customer will always ask for the cheaper price.

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

I have no specific ideas for improvement at present. We just need to verify whether our current virtual server setup is acceptable to the RBI, as they had raised questions about the VSO, ISO config...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

IBM FlashSystem vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 6% of the time

Dell Unity XT vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 5% of the time

NetApp AFF vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Everpure FlashArray vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 4% of the time

Tintri VMstore T7000 vs HPE 3PAR StoreServ

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE 3PAR StoreServ Competitors

NetApp FAS Series vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 15% of the time

IBM System Storage DS5000 Series vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 10% of the time

NEC D4 series vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 10% of the time

Huawei Symantec OceanSpace S5000 vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 9% of the time

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure (NCI) vs Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Compared 9% of the time

More Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ

August 2026

Download HPE 3PAR StoreServ product report

Buyer's Guide

Modular SAN (Storage Area Network)

July 2026

Download Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance product report

Also Known As

HPE 3PAR Flash Storage, InServ, Storeserv, 3PAR Flash Storage, HP Enterprise Storage, 3PAR Flash Array, HP 3PAR Flash Storage

Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Overview

HPE 3PAR StoreServ offers unparalleled performance and flexibility for enterprise storage needs. It is highly valued for its manageability and advanced capabilities, making it ideal for mission-critical workloads.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is a high-performance storage system known for its ease of use and robust architecture. It supports seamless upgrades and is adaptable to evolving technology, making it an excellent choice for electronic medical records, virtualization, and centralized data management. With integration capabilities supporting applications like SQL Server, VMware, and SAP, it effectively meets diverse business needs.

What are the key features of HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Ease of Use: Simplifies management tasks with an intuitive interface.
Reliability: Offers high availability and robust architecture for mission-critical workloads.
Flash Storage: Provides fast data access and improved performance.
Dynamic Provisioning: Enhances scalability and resource allocation.
Data Deduplication: Reduces storage costs by eliminating duplicate data.
Tiered Storage: Optimizes data storage with automated tiering.

What benefits should users consider when evaluating HPE 3PAR StoreServ?

Performance: Handles demanding workloads with efficiency.
Scalability: Grows with enterprise needs without compromising performance.
Integration: Seamlessly integrates with existing systems and applications.
Proactive Support: Ensures smooth operation with timely updates and support.

HPE 3PAR StoreServ is employed in industries like healthcare and finance, supporting applications such as Oracle databases and SAP. It enhances data processing and provides essential storage for virtual and real-time applications, meeting the rigorous demands of sectors requiring reliable and high-performance storage solutions.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance offers a robust storage solution designed to efficiently manage and protect data across various enterprise environments with its scalable and intuitive architecture.

Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is engineered to optimize data storage and retrieval processes, providing superior performance, seamless scalability, and efficient data protection. Its architecture supports hybrid flash and disk storage, catering to the needs of high-performance computing, cloud, and data-intensive applications. With advanced data services, it effectively handles storage consolidation, ensuring reliability and high performance for mission-critical applications. The integration flexibility allows deployment across different environments with a range of protocols for storage connectivity.

What are the standout features?

Hybrid Storage Architecture: Combines the efficiency of flash and disk storage to maximize performance.
Scalability and Flexibility: Supports growth from terabytes to petabytes, adapting to expanding data requirements.
Data Protection: Offers comprehensive data management and protection features to ensure business continuity.
Unified Storage Management: Simplifies management across mixed environments with integrated tools.

What benefits can businesses expect?

Reduced Operational Costs: Streamlines storage management, improving efficiency and reducing overhead.
Enhanced Performance: Delivers fast data access and retrieval, crucial for time-sensitive applications.
Improved Resource Utilization: Optimizes existing resources, minimizing waste and maximizing output.
High Reliability and Availability: Ensures uninterrupted access to data with coordinated data protection strategies.

In industries such as finance, healthcare, and telecommunications, Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance is implemented to manage critical workloads that demand high-speed data processing and reliable storage infrastructure. Its ability to integrate seamlessly within existing network architectures makes it an attractive choice for companies seeking to enhance their data center capabilities and ensure data integrity.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Just Energy, Latisys, team AG, DreamWorks, BlueShore Financial, Erasmus MC

Translational Genomics Research Institute, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, CyberSolutions Inc., Y-Telecom, First Alliance Bank Zambia Limited, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende, Mutlinet Pakistan, TDC A/S, Digi-Key Corporation, Thurgau Cantonal Bank

Buyer's Guide

HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

August 2026

Free Report: HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance

Find out what your peers are saying about HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance and other solutions. Updated: August 2026.

DOWNLOAD NOW

911,436 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our HPE 3PAR StoreServ vs. Oracle Sun ZFS Storage Appliance report.

See our list of best Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) vendors.

We monitor all Modular SAN (Storage Area Network) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.