Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NetIQ Identity Manager vs Oracle Identity Governance comparison

Sponsored
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Nov 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
6.4
Omada Identity's high initial cost is offset by reduced maintenance costs, improved security, and process efficiency, but ROI measurement is challenging.
No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Organizations experienced mixed ROI from Oracle Identity Governance, with efficiency gains but inconsistent performance and financial returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Omada Identity's technical support is praised for responsiveness, but outdated documentation and inconsistent response times pose challenges.
Sentiment score
8.2
NetIQ Identity Manager customer service ratings vary, with mixed technical support experiences and significant concerns about response times and availability.
Sentiment score
5.5
Oracle Identity Governance support experiences vary, with performance influenced by relationships, regional factors, and individual agent expertise.
We do not contact their technical support directly because we have a service agreement already in place with them with some dedicated and some non-dedicated resources.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Omada Identity is praised for its scalability in cloud and hybrid environments, despite minor performance and customization feedback.
Sentiment score
6.7
NetIQ Identity Manager offers good scalability but faces challenges with bulk uploads, licensing costs, and complex scaling adjustments.
Sentiment score
6.9
Oracle Identity Governance scales well for medium to large enterprises, though high user loads may cause performance issues.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
7.6
Omada Identity is stable, with minimal issues, occasional bugs, and high ratings for reliability and performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
NetIQ Identity Manager is generally stable with a rating of 8/10, occasionally encountering bugs and crashes, especially on Windows servers.
Sentiment score
6.1
Oracle Identity Governance's stability is generally above average, with occasional issues resolved through tuning, support, and high availability.
 

Room For Improvement

Omada Identity needs UI improvements, better scalability, integration, documentation, and cost-effective upgrades, with enhanced API and automation.
NetIQ Identity Manager needs better documentation, modern interface, simplified use, and seamless Active Directory integration, particularly for educational access.
Oracle Identity Governance needs UI upgrades, better integration, improved support, cost reduction, and AI-driven enhancements for user-friendliness.
The biggest issue, which is the reason why we are transitioning from their product to SailPoint, is the overall user experience.
 

Setup Cost

Omada Identity offers cost-effective on-premises pricing, though cloud options are pricier, with flexible negotiations available for enterprises.
NetIQ Identity Manager costs vary, with high initial and annual fees; competitive and sector-specific pricing options are available.
Oracle Identity Governance's high costs challenge smaller organizations, but large enterprises find value in its comprehensive features.
 

Valuable Features

Omada Identity provides governance, customization, integration, and automation for efficient identity lifecycle management with advanced reporting and strong API connectivity.
NetIQ Identity Manager provides real-time synchronization, automated workflows, and supports over a billion users with prebuilt security configurations.
Oracle Identity Governance automates identity lifecycle, offering role-based access, seamless integration, scalable management, and robust analytics features.
Technically, the product does everything one would expect from an identity and access management platform.
 

Categories and Ranking

Omada Identity
Sponsored
Ranking in User Provisioning Software
3rd
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
4th
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
48
Ranking in other categories
Identity and Access Management as a Service (IDaaS) (IAMaaS) (6th), Customer Identity and Access Management (CIAM) (3rd)
NetIQ Identity Manager
Ranking in User Provisioning Software
9th
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
18th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
18
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Oracle Identity Governance
Ranking in User Provisioning Software
7th
Ranking in Identity Management (IM)
16th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
67
Ranking in other categories
Mobile Identity (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Identity Management (IM) category, the mindshare of Omada Identity is 3.9%, down from 4.0% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of NetIQ Identity Manager is 2.2%, down from 3.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Identity Governance is 2.9%, down from 3.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Identity Management (IM)
 

Featured Reviews

Pernilla Hulth - PeerSpot reviewer
The interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview
The cloud-based deployment was straightforward, but the on-prem deployment was in a highly complex ecosystem. Omada has matured since then. I wouldn't say that it isn't straightforward, but it depends on the customer. A standard deployment is relatively easy, but it can be more painful if you need a lot of customization. We deployed the cloud solution in around four months, nearly meeting the 12-week benchmark. The on-prem deployment took three years. It was a highly complex ecosystem that was dependent on other systems. Depending on the size of your environment, you need a product owner and some specialists for maintenance. My last customer was a university with a complex environment. They had around 12 people involved in maintenance at that organization. Typically, it's between 2-5 people.
SYAMSUL SALAM - PeerSpot reviewer
The product is affordable and easy to use, but the technical support must be improved
The solution is used to manage SSO and login for internal applications The product enables detailed user management. The product is easy to use. Our users found it easier than Microsoft Identity Manager. The solution must add more configurations. There are different types of user identity in…
Amimesh Anand - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers reliability through features associated with RBAC
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product because sometimes you cannot directly upgrade from one version to another version. You have to go to the lower version and then upgrade to the higher version, which is the biggest drawback of Oracle products. There are no additional features in the tool currently, and it has been the same for the last ten years. I want to see AI features in the tool so it becomes easy for implementers. There should be a change in the installation and deployment part, which is very heavy, due to which the team requires a lot of time, like two to three weeks. It should be easy to implement the tool in two or three days.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Identity Management (IM) solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Government
9%
Manufacturing Company
7%
Educational Organization
78%
Computer Software Company
6%
Financial Services Firm
4%
University
1%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Omada Identity?
We don't have to go in and do a lot of the work that we did before. It may have saved us somewhere in the range of 10...
What needs improvement with Omada Identity?
There are some technical bits and pieces that we have looked at that could be better. For instance, when you do a rec...
What is your primary use case for Omada Identity?
We wanted a solution that could help us make HR the master of identities. We wanted a solution that could take that d...
What do you like most about NetIQ Identity Manager?
The most valuable feature of NetIQ Identity Manager for identity synchronization is the ability to provide users with...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NetIQ Identity Manager?
The pricing depends on whether we buy the solution as a service or a license. The license is expensive. If we buy it ...
What needs improvement with NetIQ Identity Manager?
The tool is used mostly in big systems to understand what is happening. There are not many technicians who know how t...
What do you like most about Oracle Identity Governance?
Role-based access control (RBAC) has been crucial for role-based management in my current company. Granular access re...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Oracle Identity Governance?
Price-wise, the tool is a little bit costly. If you are going for the short term, like one year or two years, the too...
What needs improvement with Oracle Identity Governance?
Upgrading and making changes to the product is very difficult. It is difficult when you are upgrading the product bec...
 

Also Known As

Omada Identity Suite, Omada Identity Cloud
Novell Identity Manager
Oracle Identity Manager, Oracle IAM, Oracle Identity and Access Management Suite
 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Bayer, ECCO Shoes, Vattenfall, NuStar Energy, Unicredit, Schiphol Group, BMW Group, Deutsche Leasing
Sheetz
Werkbank, Oshkosh, PeerPay, Boingo, Kellogg's, Pella, Slanska, Avaya, D+M
Find out what your peers are saying about NetIQ Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.