NewgenONE Digital Transformation Platform vs Temenos Quantum comparison

"NewgenONE's document management and workflow approach tools are very useful."

"It is an important solution for reducing the development efforts by developing a mobile application efficiently, in a shorter period of time, across multiple platforms, such as Android and iOS."

"With the new VM releases, it is a faster product with more abilities that benefit the user."

"We can use a single channel to create an interface for iOS, Android, and other channels."

"You can build your own customized, native, mobile applications in an efficient matter."

"The best feature is the Kony Studio, which is the product that is used to develop interfaces."

"You can do rapid development across multiple platforms.​"

"The best thing about Temenos Quantum is how it smoothly connects with Temenos Fabric. This simplifies our quantum application by handling identity, authentication, and security tasks seamlessly, saving us from extra coding."

"The most valuable features of Temenos Quantum are user-friendliness and customizability."

"Setting up NewgenONE is still a technical task. Simplifying the setup process would make it easier for users."

"We would like to have widgets for graphs and analytics, as well as the integration of machine learning."

"There are many issues when integrating with native sides when building an Android application of the retail accelerator or an iOS application of the retail actuator. We have to incorporate on the native side of things, which creates a lot of issues. Temenos Quantum is a proprietary product and not open source. There is not much information available on the internet for developers to reference when solving issues. You have to contact the help desk, who will then give you an appointment and work to resolve the issue. In terms of what Temenos can do better, they can make the product more mature so that we do not encounter as many black holes when encountering an issue."

"They need to improve their tech support's abilities. They do have a good tech support, but it still requires improvement."

"One area where Temenos Quantum could improve is in the flexibility of widgets and additional libraries."

"Temenos Quantum needs to improve its usability. It lacks information on the network. We have to contact the support when we are stuck with something."

"Using the API manager can be complicated when you're dealing with multiple teams, projects, and APIs. Quantum doesn't have user-based access, so I can't restrict parts of the project to specific users."

"It would be highly beneficial if future iterations of Temenos could incorporate support for QR-based payment methods, as it would enhance the platform's capabilities and align it more closely with modern payment trends"

"The UI lacks flexibility, especially regarding customizations. There are numerous issues at the fabric end, and working with the visualizer is extremely challenging. Basic development tasks require a high-end machine, and even clicking on an icon initiates a thirty-second processing time. The challenges mainly revolve around fabric and content."

"The product is expensive. First, they must purchase the product, and then pay an annual renewal fee. The renewal fee depends on the product details and the license term’s length. Clients can buy licenses for five or ten years and pay for them upfront, or they can set up a yearly renewal cycle."

"It is expensive solution."

"Temenos Quantum is an expensive tool. Taking into consideration my company's use of Temenos Quantum for a bank, the costs attached to the solution ranged from 3,00,000 to 5,00,000 USD for building one application for the bank."

"​The price is too high. The annual cost for the Kony license is very high. Every year you have to renew it in order to maintain it​"

"This is an expensive solution, and it is the biggest challenge that we face when we present this platform to customers."