Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NGINX API Gateway vs OPNsense comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NGINX API Gateway
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
API Monitoring Software (2nd)
OPNsense
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

NGINX API Gateway and OPNsense aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NGINX API Gateway is designed for API Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 10.8%, down 12.4% compared to last year.
OPNsense, on the other hand, focuses on Firewalls, holds 14.5% mindshare, down 18.1% since last year.
API Monitoring Software
Firewalls
 

Featured Reviews

Narendra-Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a scalable open-source enterprise application that's easy to maintain and configure
We use NGINX for API routing.  API is an open-source solution. It serves as a reverse proxy, routing users to our services without leaving us exposed.  API routing is the most valuable feature.  The UI could be more attractive.  I have used API Gateway for about three months. I rate NGINX API…
Eddy Ramirez - PeerSpot reviewer
Good interface and firewall capabilities and overall easy to use
The security has improved as we can isolate the network. We can do attrition prevention via a tool that comes with the solution. We can have a VPN solution in place for those that work from home, outside the network, in a secure manner. We also like that it offers good authentication. It offers radius-based authentication, which has been useful for the company. The main platform is under the Open VPN firewall. The solution has high availability. When we have different ISPs, we can actually load balance those links or actually put some priority or even classify the traffic that might go into one ISP or another.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"API routing is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to install, and the performance is good."
"We do not face any lags."
"I have found the solution has some great features overall, such as guest access capabilities, dashboards, and ease of use. There is plenty of documentation and support and it has the plugins that I needed."
"The most valuable feature is the Dual WAN in OPNSense, which offers advanced capabilities."
"The tool's integration is more like a button press."
"The initial implementation process is simple."
"I feel that its valuable features are that it is simple and free."
"We have found pretty much all the features of the solution to be valuable."
"It has an open license. It works very well, and there is an update every month."
"The feature I find most valuable, is that the program helped me to realize all the requested functionality that was needed."
 

Cons

"The product must improve its security features."
"It could be more secure because security is always a problem."
"The UI could be more attractive."
"We did not like the fact that you have to configure everything with the graphic user interface. We have used other firewalls, such as FortiGate, that you can configure via code. OPNsense is not easy to integrate. When you are deploying via GitHub or another source repository, this is not possible. That's one thing we didn't like much."
"There is room for improvement in SSL inspection."
"The only thing that I would like to see improved is the Insight or the NetFlow analysis part. It would be good to have the possibility to dig down on the Insight platform. Right now, we can easily do only a few analyses. If this page becomes more powerful, it surely will be a well-adopted platform."
"pfSense has better performance and quicker updates."
"The reporting part could be better."
"The user interface could be improved, and the DNS section should be more intuitive."
"Given that OPNsense plays a pivotal role as a firewall, safeguarding against various threats, having a reliable backup ensures uninterrupted protection even if unforeseen events impact the primary virtual machine."
"The interface needs to be simplified. It is not user-friendly."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version."
"We are using the open source version, so there is no cost involved."
"As an appliance, it's in the medium price range."
"It is open source and free."
"Its pricing is unbeatable in comparison to other firewalls. You can have a small instance that could be €80 a month with the hardware underneath. Azure Firewall and FortiGate are out of the question at this price. If you are on a public cloud, you need the underlying infrastructure. Other than that, there is no additional cost. If you have it on-prem, you have to buy the server or the appliance. The hardware cost is replaced with the infrastructure cost in the cloud. You also have costs for the public IPs and underlying VMs, but that's not related to OPNsense. It would be the same for a FortiGate deployment on Azure. You need a FortiGate license, and you need the underlying infrastructure that scales up depending on your needs."
"There are no licensing costs for OPNsence."
"It is free."
"I would rate the pricing a nine out of ten, especially considering the availability of a free community edition."
"We are using the paid version."
"It is a free solution, and when you compare it to alternatives like FortiGate, which is quite powerful but also costly, the value becomes evident."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
11%
Government
8%
Educational Organization
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX API Gateway?
We are using the open-source version. We are planning to buy the licensed version. The solution costs less in the Asia-Pacific region.
What needs improvement with NGINX API Gateway?
If we publish API or GET requests, sometimes someone can do a POST request of the API. Such security violations are not visible in the product. Other solutions provide such security features. The p...
What is the difference between PfSense and OPNsense?
Two of the most common and well recognized firewalls, PfSense and OPNsense both support site-to-site IPsec VPN and client, Open VPN and client, and PPTP client. Both also have intrusion detection a...
What do you like most about OPNsense?
What I like the most about OPNsense is that it offers an easy-to-use dashboard for device management and control.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OPNsense?
I consider the pricing of OPNsense to be high when compared with other market products. However, as a free firewall product, it is one of the best available currently.
 

Comparisons

 

Learn More

Video not available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Deciso B.V. 2. iXsystems, Inc.  3. EuroBSDCon  4. Netgate  5. Claranet  6. Voleatech  7. Open Systems AG  8. Securebit AG  9. Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH  10. AVM Computersysteme Vertriebs GmbH  Additional customers include: T-Systems International GmbH, Deutsche Telekom AG, Vodafone GmbH, 1&1 IONOS SE, OVHcloud, Hetzner Online GmbH, Strato AG, PlusServer GmbH, Host Europe GmbH, United Internet AG, 1&1 Versatel Deutschland GmbH, QSC AG, Bechtle AG, Cancom SE, Computacenter AG & Co. oHG, T-Systems Multimedia Solutions GmbH, Atos SE, Capgemini SE, Accenture plc, IBM Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, Broadcom and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.