Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NGINX API Gateway vs OPNsense comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NGINX API Gateway
Average Rating
8.4
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
API Monitoring Software (2nd)
OPNsense
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
39
Ranking in other categories
Firewalls (3rd)
 

Mindshare comparison

NGINX API Gateway and OPNsense aren’t in the same category and serve different purposes. NGINX API Gateway is designed for API Monitoring Software and holds a mindshare of 11.6%, down 13.9% compared to last year.
OPNsense, on the other hand, focuses on Firewalls, holds 12.3% mindshare, down 17.6% since last year.
API Monitoring Software
Firewalls
 

Featured Reviews

Narendra-Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
It's a scalable open-source enterprise application that's easy to maintain and configure
We use NGINX for API routing.  API is an open-source solution. It serves as a reverse proxy, routing users to our services without leaving us exposed.  API routing is the most valuable feature.  The UI could be more attractive.  I have used API Gateway for about three months. I rate NGINX API…
Eddy Ramirez - PeerSpot reviewer
Good interface and firewall capabilities and overall easy to use
The security has improved as we can isolate the network. We can do attrition prevention via a tool that comes with the solution. We can have a VPN solution in place for those that work from home, outside the network, in a secure manner. We also like that it offers good authentication. It offers radius-based authentication, which has been useful for the company. The main platform is under the Open VPN firewall. The solution has high availability. When we have different ISPs, we can actually load balance those links or actually put some priority or even classify the traffic that might go into one ISP or another.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We do not face any lags."
"API routing is the most valuable feature."
"It's easy to install, and the performance is good."
"The solution has high availability."
"I mostly rely on the solution's network intrusion detection and prevention system, along with other systems, CMs, and log management."
"I feel that its valuable features are that it is simple and free."
"We have been operating here in our lab for several months, and everything appears to be extremely stable."
"OPNsense could improve by making the configuration more web-based rather than shell or command-line-based."
"The VPN server feature is the most valuable. It is integrated with Radius and AAA for doing accounting and authentication. Insight view is also an important feature for me at this time. It allows me to assess our network traffic. I also like the firewall feature. The BSD kernel has a packet filter. It is one of the most solid frameworks for firewalls. Its user interface is one of the best interfaces I have used."
"It has firewall and VPN capabilities, which are very valuable features."
"We can open a new VPN connection easily. It's much easier than with Fortinet in our experience."
 

Cons

"The UI could be more attractive."
"The product must improve its security features."
"It could be more secure because security is always a problem."
"The interface isn't so friendly user. But we have some technicians here who are quite confident with this tool. OPNSense could maybe add sets of rules so it's simpler to manage different groups with particular needs."
"We did not like the fact that you have to configure everything with the graphic user interface. We have used other firewalls, such as FortiGate, that you can configure via code. OPNsense is not easy to integrate. When you are deploying via GitHub or another source repository, this is not possible. That's one thing we didn't like much."
"There should be more technical documentation."
"An area for improvement in OPNsense is the hardware, which needs to be updated more frequently. DNS blocking is another good feature I want to be added to the solution. pfSense has a peer-blocking feature that I also want to see in OPNsense."
"The solution would not be suitable for anything large-scale."
"The scalability needs improvement."
"In terms of improvement, the performance could be enhanced."
"The ability to set the VPN IP address would be a welcome addition."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We are using the open-source version."
"We are using the open source version, so there is no cost involved."
"OPNsense is an open-source solution and it is free to use."
"As an appliance, it's in the medium price range."
"OPNsense is open source software so at this time it is free for us to use."
"It costs about $1000."
"We are using the paid version."
"I'm using the free version of OPNsense. I didn't check the pricing for the solution because I still need to test it before getting the approval to purchase OPNsense, and it isn't easy to get approval from the higher-ups."
"It's a free solution."
"I've used the free version. My computer with two network cards at home allows me to try as many different software options as I want. I did pay for the license, but it was for the Zenarmor license, which is the packet inspection tool. They use AI for packet inspection, which integrates with OPNsense and pfSense."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which API Monitoring Software solutions are best for your needs.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
16%
Comms Service Provider
13%
Government
7%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for NGINX API Gateway?
We are using the open-source version. We are planning to buy the licensed version. The solution costs less in the Asia-Pacific region.
What needs improvement with NGINX API Gateway?
If we publish API or GET requests, sometimes someone can do a POST request of the API. Such security violations are not visible in the product. Other solutions provide such security features. The p...
What is the difference between PfSense and OPNsense?
Two of the most common and well recognized firewalls, PfSense and OPNsense both support site-to-site IPsec VPN and client, Open VPN and client, and PPTP client. Both also have intrusion detection a...
What do you like most about OPNsense?
What I like the most about OPNsense is that it offers an easy-to-use dashboard for device management and control.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OPNsense?
I consider the pricing of OPNsense to be high when compared with other market products. However, as a free firewall product, it is one of the best available currently.
 

Comparisons

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Information Not Available
1. Deciso B.V. 2. iXsystems, Inc.  3. EuroBSDCon  4. Netgate  5. Claranet  6. Voleatech  7. Open Systems AG  8. Securebit AG  9. Proxmox Server Solutions GmbH  10. AVM Computersysteme Vertriebs GmbH  Additional customers include: T-Systems International GmbH, Deutsche Telekom AG, Vodafone GmbH, 1&1 IONOS SE, OVHcloud, Hetzner Online GmbH, Strato AG, PlusServer GmbH, Host Europe GmbH, United Internet AG, 1&1 Versatel Deutschland GmbH, QSC AG, Bechtle AG, Cancom SE, Computacenter AG & Co. oHG, T-Systems Multimedia Solutions GmbH, Atos SE, Capgemini SE, Accenture plc, IBM Corporation, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Company, Cisco Systems, Inc.
Find out what your peers are saying about Postman, F5, Broadcom and others in API Monitoring Software. Updated: March 2025.
842,767 professionals have used our research since 2012.