Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs Riskified comparison

"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."

"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."

"The case management tool is user friendly."

"The solution loads big data efficiently and quickly."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."

"The most valuable feature is automation which makes our transaction capture 40 percent easier."

"I like the tracking methodology. Though it was implemented on-premises, the compliance is compatible with it. It will have certain modifications with RPM and APR. It has good exposure from a compliance point of view."

"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."

"The scoring mechanism is good."

"Its user interface could be better."

"This solution is unnecessarily complex."

"I would like for it to proactively give suggestions or hints before initiating the transaction. It could make use of the data that has already occurred, like machine learning. It should learn patterns from specific countries."

"Sometimes when we move from one version to another, a few things don't work as expected."

"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."

"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."

"I would say — Actimize is not being moved forward by Nice."

"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."

"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."

"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."

"The user interface could be more intuitive."

"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."

"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."

"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."

"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."

"It is determined by the requirements of each company."