Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management vs Riskified comparison

"The solution is easier to set up, configure, and use than other products."

"The core engine seems to be better than the rest for pattern recognition. It is able to process large amounts of data."

"Nice's most valuable feature would be its rule engine."

"The solution's technical support is good."

"They have a very expansive transaction monitoring fleet. They have a lot of models and rules to choose from. Its flexibility or ability to customize a model is very impressive as compared to other platforms."

"The solution user-friendly interactive, informative and it is also very light."

"It's a very good product for compliance and transaction monitoring for anti-money laundering."

"The most valuable feature is the designer, which allows us to connect to UI and build things directly, such as creating a platform with our synchronizing policy manager rules, without any additional requirements."

"Our clients have definitely avoided losing money on multiple occasions due to fraud."

"The most valuable features of this solution are the scoring and the yes, or no function."

"The scoring mechanism is good."

"One of the problems that our clients generally talk about is the price of the product when they have to purchase the product and the licenses for it. Those are on the higher side."

"From the front end side, the UI is definitely user-friendly. It is highly compatible as long as the reading is at the coding point of view. But it can't provide certain high coding. When a person clicks on any kind of scenario or alert, I would like to have a metadata help menu."

"Its user interface could be better."

"Processes don't function when front end is down."

"It would be better if it integrated with other tools. Actimize uses many databases, and everything on Actimize has been deployed to the database. On the customer side, on the front end side, if they focus more on integrating with other applications, it can make the tool better. The reporting feature and dashboards could be better. In the next release, I would like them to incorporate a Tableau-type reporting structure within this tool."

"The solution needs to mitigate and provide an update for one listener process that keeps failing."

"Licensing costs are high compared to other products in the market."

"The patch section has room for improvement."

"The user interface could be more intuitive."

"The fraud channel is a sensitive spot, so it's always complex."

"I can't think of any issues that we've faced that need to be improved."

"We need a separate license for each of the packages, such as the core package, self-development package, and customization package."

"Nice Actimize Fraud & Authentication Management is an expensive product."

"I don't know how licensing is handled in the current organization. I know that Actimize provides an option for yearly licensing because that's what we had in my previous job."

"I don't like the length of our vendor contracts because it kills our flexibility."

"It is reasonable for enterprise customers."

"It is determined by the requirements of each company."