Nintex Process Platform vs OpenText ProVision comparison

Nintex and OpenText are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. Nintex is ranked #10 with an average rating of 8.3, while OpenText is ranked #46. Nintex holds a 2.0% mindshare in BPM, compared to OpenText’s 0.3% mindshare. Additionally, 90% of Nintex users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 66% of OpenText users who would recommend it.

Nintex Process Platform

Read 24 Nintex Process Platform reviews

2,623 Views
1,564 Comparison Views

90% willing to recommend

OpenText ProVision

Read 3 OpenText ProVision reviews

223 Views
136 Comparison Views

66% willing to recommend

Nintex Process Platform

OpenText ProVision

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Nintex Process Platform and OpenText ProVision compete in the process management domain. Data suggests customers favor Nintex Process Platform for its intuitive automation capabilities, while OpenText ProVision is preferred for its comprehensive modeling tools crucial for complex processes.

Features: Nintex Process Platform focuses on process automation with advanced workflow capabilities, intuitive interface, and seamless integration with external systems. OpenText ProVision offers extensive modeling tools, enterprise architecture capabilities, and collaboration features necessary for detailed process analysis.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Nintex Process Platform is cloud-based with simple deployment and responsive customer service. OpenText ProVision supports both on-premise and cloud solutions, though its setup may be more time-consuming due to its comprehensive toolset. Nintex's deployment flexibility and customer support give it an edge in implementation ease.

Pricing and ROI: Nintex Process Platform has competitive pricing with potentially quicker ROI due to its efficient implementation and automation efficiencies. OpenText ProVision might incur higher initial costs but delivers long-term value through in-depth analytics and modeling capabilities. The choice depends on whether the organization prioritizes automation or detailed process analysis.

To learn more, read our detailed Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision Report (Updated: April 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision

April 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Nintex Process Platform

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

10th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Process Automation (9th), Workload Automation (11th)

OpenText ProVision

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

46th

Average Rating

6.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.2

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Enterprise Architecture Management (28th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of Nintex Process Platform is 2.0%, down from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText ProVision is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Damilola Adeleye

Business Automation Developer at Polaris Bank Nigeria Plc

Straightforward interface and user-friendly

There are a lot of apps in K2, but what I really found that needs improvement is the management section of K2, especially the management server and the admin page where you can manage processes, add users, set security fees, and add licenses. The reason for this is because the part that is the section of administration, particularly the management called rows, has multiple rules, as many as you want. For instance, you may have around 200 rules, and when you view them, only the first ten are displayed, and you have to click next to see the next ten and so on until you get to the hundredth rule. On that page, as of today, we only have what we call to fetch, where you can search for a particular rule you're looking for, or else you have to keep clicking until you get to the final page you want. So that's a bit challenging.

Read full review

reviewer1944672

Senior Director, Head of Process & Functional Architecture, Intelligent Automation at a real estate/law firm with 10,001+ employees

Good attribute attachment but problems with collaboration

I primarily use OpenText ProVision to create our end-to-end process repository and library for different parts of the organization, capturing the collaboration process to get the right inputs OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I find it useful to utilize LDAP query action to find out the status of a particular user."

"Our solutions using Nintex has been most successful in automating HR processes because it allows you to easily and rapidly build solutions that conform to the unique business processes for each entity."

"This tool is really helpful in reducing a lot of manual work. Its drag and drop components help to create a workflow faster than SharePoint Workflow Designer."

"The most valuable features of this solution are that it's no code, it's very flexible, and it's easy to design."

"The solution offers very good integration capabilities. We've never had issues integrating it without solutions."

"Easily maintained and customization is quite simple."

"I think the initial setup is fine."

"I like the feature of getting an email for a workflow error, then I do not have to go through every instance."

More Nintex Process Platform pros

"All the features come as part of a standard license."

"The stability of the product is very good."

"OpenText ProVision's best feature is the capability to attach a variety of attributes and extract and analyze that information."

Cons

"Difficult to include external partners with the solution deployed on-premise."

"There is room for improvement in the user experience in the forms."

"The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes."

"It is very flexible because you can design your own main forms, but if there were some templates according to your market, it would be more useful for a new customer. That would make K2 more user friendly and easier to use."

"The solution is a bit too expensive. It could be cheaper."

"The Workflow Designer needs improvement."

"Nintex seems to be very server intensive. It is one of the reasons that we are moving to a different product on the SharePoint 2016 platform."

"Unfortunately, Nintex Workflow is not that stable. We are looking at shifting to another tool."

More Nintex Process Platform cons

"OpenText ProVision's collaboration management is quite complicated and difficult to use."

"Integrating with or interfacing with other tools like data management tools would be very helpful."

"Lacks the ability to have your own in-house developments."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Certainly. Notably, in terms of cost, this solution presents a substantial advantage, being approximately forty percent more economical compared to Oracle. It offers flexibility with two deployment options, catering to both cloud and on-premises preferences. Moreover, within each deployment option, there are two variations available. For organizations with limited IT resources and relying on citizen developers—individuals from the business side comfortable with technology—the platform allows for a more hands-on approach. These users can independently implement solutions without extensive coding or custom development. In contrast, the KQ solution at Symantec is adept at addressing the needs of sectors like banking, where extensive custom development is required for seamless integration with existing applications, websites, and ensuring robust security measures."

"The price of this solution is affordable but the problem in Algeria is our community is a bit slower. The new clients might feel the solution is a bit expensive."

"Our maintenance costs are reduced."

"The enterprise version has some additional features that I would like to use, but the price is not fair."

"We pay on a yearly basis. It's my understanding that we pay approximately $11,000/year."

"There is an initial fee when purchasing and a fee for maintenance afterward."

"Nintex is around INR 200 per license in India, which is much cheaper. Smaller organizations are always looking for cost-effective solutions, and Nintex provides local solutions with very low pricing."

"Offering a licensing model that allows for multiple small workflows would be a huge improvement to an already great platform."

More Nintex Process Platform pricing and cost advice

Information not available

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

18%

Government

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

20%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Construction Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about K2?

The latest version of Nintex has many features. We have a clear roadmap and the necessary application to integrate it into our platform.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for K2?

Nintex Process Platform is expensive. Prices relate to both features and the professional services necessary due to our lack of an implementation team.

See all answers

What needs improvement with K2?

The user interface in Nintex needs improvement. It is not very intuitive and requires changes. Additionally, the deployment process should be easier.

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Camunda vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 23% of the time

SAP Signavio Process Manager vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 10% of the time

Pega Platform vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 8% of the time

Bizagi vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 7% of the time

Appian vs Nintex Process Platform

Compared 6% of the time

More Nintex Process Platform Competitors

Visio vs OpenText ProVision

Compared 100% of the time

More OpenText ProVision Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform

April 2025

Download Nintex Process Platform product report

Buyer's Guide

Business Process Management (BPM)

April 2025

Download OpenText ProVision product report

Also Known As

K2 blackpearl, K2 Five, Nintex Workflow

Metastorm ProVision

Overview

Nintex Process Platform automates processes such as approvals, vendor requests, and leave management, optimizing workflows in sectors like government, banking, and HR.

Nintex Process Platform streamlines collaboration and integrates seamlessly with Microsoft tools. It supports account management, loan origination, claims reimbursement, and public e-services, while also assisting with onboarding, resource management, and compliance workflows. Users benefit from its ease of maintenance, low-code development, and powerful workflow engine capable of handling complex processes through SmartObjects technology.

What are some key features?

Easy Maintenance - Simplifies ongoing management and updates.
Low-Code Development - Enables quick application creation with minimal coding.
Extensive Integration - Connects with diverse data sources through SmartObjects technology.
Drag-and-Drop Interface - Offers a user-friendly, visually intuitive design for creating workflows.
Automatic Workflow Triggers - Allows for seamless automation of predefined actions.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystems - Ensures compatibility with SharePoint and Office 365.

What benefits should users look for in reviews?

Affordability - Offers cost-effective solutions for businesses.
Customizability - Provides tailored solutions that meet specific needs.
Support - Beneficial for addressing issues and optimizing performance.
Rapid Development - Facilitates quick project turnaround due to its pre-built constructs.

Nintex Process Platform is implemented across various sectors, such as government, banking, and HR, providing significant improvements in workflow efficiency. In governmental agencies, it facilitates public e-services and compliance workflows, while in banking, it supports account management and loan origination. HR departments benefit from enhanced onboarding, resource management, and leave management processes.

Nintex

OpenTextâs MIM (formerly Metastorm Integration & Managed File Transfer) solution provides a single platform for you to manage both batch and real-time, system-based integrations and processes complete with an audit trail to ensure operational success. With OpenText MIM, your organization can: Track high volume transaction and data transfers and file content from a centralized dashboard Ensure corporate data and auditing compliance requirements Enhance agility and visibility into end-to-end process activities at the system, data and human interaction levels Tie legacy systems into new SOA environments Simplify interactions with your existing legacy systems and data by integrating them into your improved business processes

OpenText

Sample Customers

SEA Corp, Omnicom Group, Verizon, STIHL

Delta Technology, Export Development Canada, Rompetrol, Salt River Project, AMEC, U.S. Air Force, HP Consulting & Integration

Buyer's Guide

Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision

April 2025

Free Report: Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision

Find out what your peers are saying about Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Nintex Process Platform vs. OpenText ProVision report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.