Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Rapid7 and PortSwigger are both solutions in the Application Security Tools category. Additionally, 100% of Rapid7 users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 98% of PortSwigger users who would recommend it.
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Read 62 PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reviews
  • 3,592 Views
  • 2,373 Comparison Views
98% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive Summary
We performed a comparison between NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Application Security Tools Report (Updated: December 2024).
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
Download the complete report
Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL]
Average Rating
9.0
Number of Reviews
1
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
PortSwigger Burp Suite Prof...
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.7
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Application Security Tools (8th), Static Application Security Testing (SAST) (6th), Fuzz Testing Tools (1st)
 

Featured Reviews

it_user245400 - PeerSpot reviewer
There were some incompatibility issues, but it's a fairly stable product.
The ability to exploit injection capabilities It has enabled me to develop a more comprehensive SDLC. The vulnerability mapping needs some work. I've been using it for one year alongside Rapid7. There were some incompatibility issues after a Windows update where the NTO consumed all the…
Read full review
Anuradha.Kapoor Kapoor - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers efficient scanning of entire websites but presence of false positive bugs, leading to time-consuming efforts in distinguishing real bugs from false alarms
We have found that so many times, false positive bugs are there, and then we spend a lot of time basically separating them from real bugs. So that's the reason we are looking for some other tool. So we were in discussion with Acunetix. Therefore, the false positive rate is, like, something that we would like to improve. What we are looking for is if this false positive rate goes down because we were OWASP Zap tool users, which was free anyway. But there were a lot of false positives there, and we used to spend a lot of time, like, for security reasons, reproducing those bugs for the development team to fix it. So then we thought, okay, why not we go with the tool? Even if it is not very expensive. But still, every year, we have to renew the license. And we got this tool. Again, we found that in this tool also, even if it is less, there are still a lot of false positive bugs out there. So we again have to spend so much time. So we hired a security tester, who was basically using Acunetix in his previous company for almost three years, and then you said that in that scanning is very slow. The scanning is also slow. Like, sometimes the site scan takes eight hours, six to eight hours. Yeah. And whereas in Acunetix, it took three to four hours. And plus, there are no false positives. I'm not saying none but there's very little. But here, the rate sometimes is very high. These are the two features I think we would like to improve further.
Read full review
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
Is OWASP Zap better than PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro?
OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with ...
See all answers
What do you like most about PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional?
The pricing for Burp Suite Professional is not very high, however, it could be more flexible for clients.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Acunetix vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 18% of the time
Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
Fortify WebInspect vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 14% of the time
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
OWASP Zap vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 10% of the time
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
SonarQube Server (formerly SonarQube) vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 9% of the time
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Logo
HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
Compared 8% of the time
More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] reportDownload NT OBJECTives NTOSpider [EOL] product report
Buyer's Guide
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
January 2025
PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional reportDownload PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional product report
 

Also Known As

NTOSpider
Burp
 

Learn More

Rapid7
PortSwigger
 

Overview

While today's malicious attackers pursue a variety of goals, they share a preferred channel of attack - the millions of custom web, mobile, and cloud applications companies deploy to serve their customers. NTOSpider dynamically scans these applications for vulnerabilities across all modern technologies, provides tools that speed remediation and monitors applications for changes.

Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

 

Sample Customers

University of Salzburg, Chr. Hansen, American Chemical Society, North American Retail Chain, Wiltshire Council, Redner's Markets, Acosta Sales & Marketing
Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
Buyer's Guide
Application Security Tools
December 2024
Download Free Report
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools. Updated: December 2024.
DOWNLOAD NOW
831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.