Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs Zenoss Cloud comparison

Nutanix and Zenoss are both solutions in the Container Monitoring category. Nutanix is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.5, while Zenoss is ranked #10. Nutanix holds a 0.2% mindshare in DCM, compared to Zenoss’s 0.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Zenoss users who would recommend it.
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Read 12 Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reviews
  • 61 Views
  • 51 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Zenoss Cloud
Read 8 Zenoss Cloud reviews
  • 96 Views
  • 65 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Feb 3, 2025

Zenoss Cloud and Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE compete in IT operations and cloud-native environments. NKE seems to have the upper hand in Kubernetes management due to its robust feature set.

Features: Zenoss Cloud's standout features include real-time IT monitoring providing deep insights, integration across various environments for a centralized view, and a customizable dashboard for network overview. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine emphasizes automation within Kubernetes clusters, scalability to streamline management processes, and an intuitive platform for easy cluster setup.

Room for Improvement: Zenoss Cloud could enhance its user interface to be more intuitive, reduce complexity in configuration for beginners, and expand integration with emerging technologies. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine could improve its multi-cloud compatibility, offer more detailed monitoring capabilities, and enhance documentation for better guidance.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Zenoss Cloud provides a straightforward deployment process supported by responsive customer service for seamless integration. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine offers a streamlined deployment process optimized for cloud-native environments, with customer service proficient in managing Kubernetes complexities.

Pricing and ROI: Zenoss Cloud's pricing involves moderate setup costs with ROI closely related to its comprehensive monitoring features. Nutanix Kubernetes Engine may require a higher initial investment, balanced by its automation capabilities and reduced operational overhead, making it more suitable for those who prioritize advanced Kubernetes management.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud Report (Updated: March 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud
March 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Ranking in Container Monitoring
6th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
12
Ranking in other categories
Container Management (11th)
Zenoss Cloud
Ranking in Container Monitoring
10th
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
8
Ranking in other categories
Application Infrastructure (33rd), Event Monitoring (14th), Network Monitoring Software (76th), Server Monitoring (23rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (53rd), Cloud Monitoring Software (40th), AIOps (20th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Container Monitoring category, the mindshare of Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE is 0.2%, down from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Zenoss Cloud is 0.5%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Monitoring
 

Featured Reviews

Prasanthraj PN - PeerSpot reviewer
Offers efficient deployment and management with easy resource allocation, yet faces challenges in integration and compatibility
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE ( /products/nutanix-kubernetes-engine-nke-reviews ) offers easy and fast deployment, management, stability, reliability, and cost-effectiveness. The resource allocation is very simple. If we need to expand the memory, storage space, or processor core, it is very easy to manage through our central control. These features are what stand out the most.
Read full review
ClaudiaChen - PeerSpot reviewer
Generates close to real-time alerts so users can resolve issues, but needs more integration and public cloud monitoring features
As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The product integrates well with our infrastructure."
"Nutanix's support is really good."
"The solution provides no downtime features. If we face issues, we create a new port, deploy it there, and then drop the existing one. This way, we avoid NKE downtime on our website."
"Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"We can do a lot of provisioning."
"We can add some add-ons and plugins to the product if we need to."
"The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase."
"The platform is valuable due to its ease of use and quick deployment capabilities."
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE pros
"They have also accommodated many state-of-the-art technologies like Docker and ZooKeeper."
"Its Docker Container concept is mind blowing. It is the first monitoring tool which comes with Docker features."
"The product offers good documentation that helps with initial training."
"It's easy to use."
"The custom built integration is one of the most valuable features because you can see all the especially critical items."
"What I like most about Zenoss Service Dynamics is that it monitors the devices and gives close to real-time alerts. For example, in case the device is not available, Zenoss Service Dynamics generates an alert so my team can resolve the issue."
"The most valuable feature is the flexible discovery mechanism."
 

Cons

"We need a backup of production clusters."
"Areas for improvement in Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) include upgrading management capabilities and enhancing the user interface for improved usability."
"NKE could benefit from additional features that support more advanced Kubernetes functionalities and configurations."
"One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMware to RHV or other solutions. It's not specifically a Nutanix problem but rather an issue migrating appliances from one VM infrastructure to another. Some kernel-level and storage-level issues impact this process."
"Nutanix has limitations compared to VMware, particularly in testing and industry tie-ups with different OEMs. Deploying virtual machines, especially for industrial automation, can be challenging due to compatibility issues."
"GUI lacks sufficient information to help with understanding the installation and process."
"In the next release, I would like to have automatic dynamic scaling, both upscaling and downscaling."
"I would like to have more nodes for availability and storage."
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE cons
"There was a problem with Zenoss and storage monitoring."
"As Zenoss Service Dynamics is more for network-centric devices and you want to monitor, for example, a server, its services, IP addresses, and interfaces, if it's a network and you're going to monitor multiple items, you'll be charged multiple times. This is what Zenoss Service Dynamics needs to improve to make sure that customers pay just one fee to monitor the entire server. What I'd like to see in Zenoss Service Dynamics in the future is a public cloud monitoring feature, particularly for the Azure public cloud. Another additional feature I'd like to see in the next release of the solution is integration with the Azure public cloud because I know that there are some services from Azure that Zenoss Service Dynamics is currently unable to monitor."
"It would be ideal if the product offered sound alerts."
"Now it is stable, but they should design threshold parameters in percentage instead of raw values."
"There is room for improvement with the administrative part. They introduced Control Center to manage things in Zenoss 5. The services that Zenoss provides remained the same, but the administrative part, since they introduced Docker, etc., has become a little complex"
"The AI aspect needs to improve."
"The inclusion of a feature to show a graphical view of the network would be a helpful improvement."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The platform is averagely priced. I rate the pricing as four out of ten."
"While deploying Kubernetes clusters on Nutanix is cost-effective, there may be additional costs for remote branch offices where Kubernetes is less common."
"I rate NKE's pricing a six out of ten."
"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is cheap, and ten is expensive."
"The product's licenses are included in the software version deployed in our data center."
"There are additional costs you'll have to pay apart from the license fee for Zenoss Service Dynamics. I can't remember exactly how much my company is paying because I don't handle the finance part, but the cost is paid annually. On a scale of one to five, with one being the cheapest and five being the most expensive, I'm rating the solution three out of five."
"It depends on the customer, what he wants."
"The pricing depends on the environment, the number of services, and the size of the data center. It can go from $100,000 to a million dollars."
"It is very cost-effective compared to the tools I worked with in the past. The company is gaining a lot with respect to the cost factor. It provides agentless monitoring and in a very cheap way."
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Container Monitoring solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
10%
Manufacturing Company
9%
Computer Software Company
23%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Insurance Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?
The most valuable features of the Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) are its simplicity and efficiency during the initial cluster creation phase.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?
One major issue we faced was that appliances couldn't migrate from VMware to the tool. However, this seems to be a common problem across platforms. We've seen the same issue when migrating from VMw...
See all answers
What is your primary use case for Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE?
We utilize NKE to create these clusters, configuring components to meet specific business requirements.
See all answers
What is the best network monitoring software for large enterprises?
In my experience, I worked with many monitoring software, but the one that gave me the most functionalities of a large-scale company is Zenoss, due to its ability to monitor completely hybrid and a...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Compared 38% of the time
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Logo
VMware Tanzu Platform vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Compared 25% of the time
Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Logo
Kubernetes vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Compared 11% of the time
Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Logo
Rancher Labs vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Compared 7% of the time
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Logo
Nutanix Kubernetes Platform (NKP) vs Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
Compared 4% of the time
More Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE Competitors
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Zabbix vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 40% of the time
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Nagios XI vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 33% of the time
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 15% of the time
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud Logo
Centreon vs Zenoss Cloud
Compared 13% of the time
More Zenoss Cloud Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE
March 2025
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE reportDownload Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE product report
Buyer's Guide
Zenoss Cloud
March 2025
Zenoss Cloud reportDownload Zenoss Cloud product report
 

Also Known As

Nutanix Karbon
Cloud Monitoring, Zenoss Service Dynamics
 

Overview

Nutanix Kubernetes Engine (NKE) is an enterprise Kubernetes management solution that simplifies provisioning, operations, and lifecycle management of Kubernetes.
Nutanix
Zenoss Cloud revolutionizes IT infrastructure monitoring with a service-centric approach, prioritizing the overall health of services and applications. Harnessing the power of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning (AIOps), Zenoss Cloud offers end-to-end visibility across servers, networks, storage, and applications. Real-time monitoring, event correlation, and automated remediation ensure immediate insights and efficient issue resolution. The customizable dashboards empower users to tailor visualizations to their needs, while scalability accommodates diverse infrastructures. Zenoss Cloud guarantees improved application performance, reduced downtime, and enhanced IT efficiency, making it an ideal choice for businesses of all sizes, from small enterprises seeking simplicity to large corporations requiring advanced scalability. Experience unified monitoring and proactive management with Zenoss Cloud, a comprehensive solution that transforms IT infrastructure optimization in today's complex environments.
Zenoss
 

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
2degrees, Rackspace, State of North Dakota, El Paso Independent School District, NWN Corporation
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud
March 2025
Free Report: Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nutanix Kubernetes Engine NKE vs. Zenoss Cloud report.
See our list of best Container Monitoring vendors.

We monitor all Container Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.