Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs OpenText Data Protector comparison

Nutanix and OpenText are both solutions in the Backup and Recovery category. Nutanix is ranked #54 with an average rating of 7.0, while OpenText is ranked #23 with an average rating of 7.5. Nutanix holds a 0.6% mindshare in BRS, compared to OpenText’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 50% of Nutanix users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 80% of OpenText users who would recommend it.
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Read 6 Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup reviews
  • 896 Views
  • 769 Comparison Views
50% willing to recommend
OpenText Data Protector
Read 102 OpenText Data Protector reviews
  • 1,521 Views
  • 931 Comparison Views
80% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Sep 11, 2024

OpenText Data Protector and Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup are prominent solutions in the data protection marketplace. OpenText Data Protector seems to have the upper hand due to its comprehensive support and flexibility.

Features: OpenText Data Protector provides multi-platform compatibility, extensive integration capabilities, and flexibility. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup integrates seamlessly with Nutanix infrastructure, offers advanced backup features, and delivers high performance.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Data Protector could benefit from a more modern interface, enhanced reporting capabilities, and a simpler user experience. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup needs more efficient storage utilization, broader third-party integrations, and improved customer service response times.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Data Protector offers straightforward deployment processes and reliable support, though initial setup can be complex. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup provides smooth deployment within the Nutanix ecosystem but has inconsistent customer service response times.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Data Protector is considered affordable with a good ROI based on user feedback. Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup has a higher upfront cost but justifies this with its feature-rich environment. Many users feel Nutanix's advanced features and integration capabilities justify the higher pricing.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector Report (Updated: April 2025).
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector
April 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 848,270 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
54th
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
6
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
OpenText Data Protector
Ranking in Backup and Recovery
23rd
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
5.8
Number of Reviews
102
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Backup and Recovery category, the mindshare of Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is 0.6%, up from 0.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of OpenText Data Protector is 0.6%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Backup and Recovery
 

Featured Reviews

Ingvar Ingason - PeerSpot reviewer
An affordable product that offers a reasonably good technical support
I rate the product's initial setup phase an eight on a scale of one to ten, where one is a difficult setup phase, and ten is an easy setup phase. The product's installation phase took me around two weeks. On average, it usually takes about a week or two to deploy when everything is in place. The solution is deployed on a hybrid cloud from Azure.
Read full review
Jeroen Vranckaerts - PeerSpot reviewer
Though a highly stable tool, it needs to be made easier to use and configure
Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a five out of ten. OpenText Data Protector is complex to configure correctly, but the areas concerning the data and compression are good. Once you get the product to work, it works, but it's much too complex to configure and troubleshoot, as it takes a lot of time and energy, making it not so efficient. Once the tool is configured in your environment, it provides good backup and compression features. In my company, we use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our servers, and we have a team of 20 people to take care of the data backup using the tool. My company doesn't use OpenText Data Protector as a backup for our client's computers. In my company, we have scheduled the process related to backup, which makes the tool run daily around 30 to 40 times.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Nutanix can converge legacy-style rack mount servers, so it is highly scalable."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten."
"We use this solution as an integrated backup solution and it is integrated from the backup provider to the Nutanix solution."
"We find the ease of use valuable."
"Nutanix has its own backup system known as HYCU, as well as its own virtual server."
"I like the autofill-over feature and the simplicity of the solution."
"The tool's most valuable aspect is its ease of management. It was not complex. In terms of features, I can mention a couple of things. For example, if you need to restore a VM, you can do it with multiple streams in OpenText Data Protector, which is an advantage over Commvault, from what I've noticed, having worked with multiple tools. Another thing is the Oracle backups; configuring Oracle backups is much easier in OpenText Data Protector."
"The reliability of HP Data Protector is the most valuable feature for us."
"Performs the backup properly and protects our data."
"Deduplication implementation with CAPA is very good."
"The initial setup was relatively easy."
"I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"Ability to automatically detect and secure new data sources without requiring manual configuration intervention."
"The solution is easy to use."
More OpenText Data Protector pros
 

Cons

"The solution's setup process should be simplified."
"The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"I would like to see the multi-cloud improve."
"Nutanix is not secure enough, and it needs to be more resilient."
"This solution could be improved with regards to the hosts that integrate with the platform itself. Each of the hosts integrated with the storage and networking only provide one instance of a backup."
"It could be cheaper."
"In terms of what can be improved, I would say integrations with MongoDB. We use MongoDB and we need to go to scripts to do backups. We need more integrations."
"We faced some certification issues after we upgraded to version 10.2."
"The technical support is poor and should be improved."
"People prefer Veeam because the interface is easier, and Data Protector is difficult in comparison."
"The downside of the flexibility on offer is if you over-configure it, it may fail to function as some configurations may not match."
"It would be ideal if they could improve their level of support."
"Recently, clients have raised concerns about the lack of comprehensive documentation for Data Protector."
"VM backups needs to be improved. They need to make it similar to the way Veeam and Commvault are doing the virtual backups."
More OpenText Data Protector cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"I rate the pricing a five out of ten because the price is average."
"Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is fairly priced."
"While Nutanix Mine is extremely expensive for small businesses, it is a very cost-effective product for enterprise businesses."
"On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two."
"There is a perpetual license involved in addition to support which needs to be renewed annually."
"Avoid using many LTO drives; when using fewer drives, the price will be extremely good."
"They have two types of licensing, one is for storage capacity and the other is client licensing. The capacity licensing here is a bit expensive."
"Pricing/licensing is Data Protector's single best offering. In its most basic environment, the only license required is for whatever target device is required."
"In Data Protector, if you need extra features, you need to buy the agents for these features. Some of the features are Terabytes, some of them are agents. There's some complexity in the pricing and licensing."
"The licensing structure provides cost savings to business."
"Data Protector's pricing is very competitive and we have no issues in this regard. I would give it an eight out of ten in terms of pricing."
"The license for the solution is very expensive compared to the other products in the market."
More OpenText Data Protector pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Backup and Recovery solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Government
11%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
Manufacturing Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Nutanix Mine?
Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...I rate the technical support a nine out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Nutanix Mine?
On a scale of one to ten, where one is affordable or low, and ten is expensive or high, I rate the price as two.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Nutanix Mine?
The price of the product is an area of concern where improvements are required.
See all answers
What do you like most about Micro Focus Data Protector?
I haven't experienced any crashes while using the solution...Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten.
See all answers
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Micro Focus Data Protector?
The solution is expensive as it requires purchasing all features without the option to negotiate based on client numbers, unlike Veeam which offers flexibility in pricing.
See all answers
What needs improvement with Micro Focus Data Protector?
OpenText Data Protector is not user-friendly, especially for cloud backup. It lacks functions and facilities compared to Veeam, which offers more user-friendliness for virtual machine backups. Ther...
See all answers
 

Comparisons

Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Logo
Dell PowerProtect Data Manager vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Compared 29% of the time
IBM Spectrum Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Logo
IBM Spectrum Protect vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Compared 16% of the time
Dell Avamar vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Logo
Dell Avamar vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Compared 13% of the time
N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Logo
N-able Cove Data Protection vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Compared 11% of the time
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Logo
IBM Spectrum Protect Plus vs Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup
Compared 10% of the time
More Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup Competitors
Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veeam Data Platform vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 74% of the time
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Veritas NetBackup vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 17% of the time
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector Logo
Commvault Cloud vs OpenText Data Protector
Compared 10% of the time
More OpenText Data Protector Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Backup and Recovery
April 2025
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup reportDownload Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup product report
Buyer's Guide
OpenText Data Protector
April 2025
OpenText Data Protector reportDownload OpenText Data Protector product report
 

Also Known As

Nutanix Mine
Micro Focus Data Protector, Data Protector, OmniBack, HPE Data Protector
 

Overview

Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup is a turnkey solution that makes backup infrastructure simple and invisible by combining the Nutanix Cloud Platform technology with leading enterprise backup software for dedicated data backup and recovery.
Nutanix
OpenText Data Protector standardizes and consolidates backups across multiple platforms. It provides secure, comprehensive backup protection for business-critical data and applications whether virtual, physical, or online in the cloud.
OpenText
 

Sample Customers

JetBlue, International Speedway Corporation, SAIC Volkswagen
GSK Vaccines, Repsol, Vodafone Group, Siemens AG, Medium Enterprise Transportation Services Company
Buyer's Guide
Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector
April 2025
Free Report: Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector
Find out what your peers are saying about Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector and other solutions. Updated: April 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
848,270 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our Nutanix Mine Integrated Backup vs. OpenText Data Protector report.
See our list of best Backup and Recovery vendors.

We monitor all Backup and Recovery reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.