One Identity Safeguard vs senhasegura SaaS comparison

"The most valuable feature of One Identity Safeguard is the user-friendly interface."

"The Transparent Mode is the number one advantage of the product."

"In terms of the user experience, it is a pretty useful product. It works in a good way."

"We have limited the possibilities for malicious actions and have made it safer for our users when they are using privileged accounts."

"We don't need to use VPN for remote access."

"I have found the most useful feature of One Identity Safeguard to be Privileged Sessions."

"We use the solution’s Approval Anywhere feature which enables us to add an extra layer of security for critical passwords without adding time-consuming approval processes. By using this platform, if someone goes on a vacation, out of office, or needs urgent/planned leave, then our setup will select the functions tied to that person and automatically delegate them to the next person. That person can start performing that duty based on their access. No sharing of passwords is required."

"From my experience, the features are best for monitoring and the usage of LDAP and SSH."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"We have feature requests and would like to see the turnaround times on those features to be faster."

"The product uses a lot of resources in current sessions."

"One Identity Safeguard can improve by having more integration with multiple devices."

"We've had issues managing accounts and access to some data saved on the servers. Accounts are granted a new working certificate daily. We have an account to do it on APIs online and sync it with that. If the path changes at some point or someone changes the password, I don't know if it's from the Active Directory or what."

"We sometimes face issues with configuration and things like that, but we manage to solve them."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"We currently have a problem with the Active Directory integrations on Windows. Some of our users need to be logged with Active Directory, but we are having communication issues between One Identity and Active Directory. It seems that Active Directory is not well-integrated."

"There is a lack of documentation and many problems with the plugins."

"The tool has to improve its interface and make the product more user-friendly."

"As compared to other products, it is reasonable, but the training sessions are too expensive."

"Setup cost, pricing and licensing are all very expensive."

"They have comparable pricing. All identity products are essentially priced in a similar way. It's a per-user base."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"It is a bit on the pricey side, but you get what you pay for. You don't want to get anything too cheap because then you get cheap stuff and cheap support. That really never helps anybody."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"Compared to CyberArk, the tool is very cheap."