One Identity Safeguard vs senhasegura SaaS comparison

"I like the discovery functionality and the change password feature through the check-in. I also like the bulk import with the help of templates that come with it out of the box. With the help of these few features, my tasks are made easier."

"I have found One Identity Safeguard to be stable."

"It has greatly helped improve our security posture. Safeguard has an option where it will reset passwords on service accounts, then go out to those servers where that service account is running as a service and update the password on it. That makes password changes very easy. We can regularly change passwords now and are planning on making it an annual activity, where all the people who own service accounts will go in and make sure all their passwords get changed, updated, and reset."

"The monitoring system is very good."

"The system is easy to manage, as it is not a system that you will change everything all of a sudden. It evolves most of the time with customer requests."

"The extensible framework for authentication is one of the most valuable features. We use an MFA plug-in and a lot of different factors, depending on what the business use-cases are. And of course, the auditing functionality is also valuable."

"The customer service and technical support are very good."

"The most unique and valuable features are the upstream and downstream throughput capacities; the Safeguard platform provides agile integration. In actuality, all the features are valuable. They're good, user-friendly."

"The product's initial setup phase is easy."

"The interface is better now, but it still could be improved a lot. It needs more organization, menus, automatic refresh of information, and Web 2.0."

"We would like to have the option of importing assets by using the CSV file. It was available in the earlier versions, but it is not available now."

"It needs more marketing."

"We have feature requests and would like to see the turnaround times on those features to be faster."

"Something for One Identity to look at is having integration guidelines for how to logically group accounts."

"The GUI has room for improvement because it is confusing and cumbersome."

"We can't review or audit HTTP and HTTPS. This functionality should be added so that we can review and audit HTTP and HTTPS."

"I would like to see support for RDP over HTTPS so this product can be used in conjunction with the Microsoft terminal."

"The tool has to improve its interface and make the product more user-friendly."

"The license is around $3,000 per month."

"It was definitely cheaper than the other two products that we evaluated."

"The license is very expensive for us, partly due to inflation and partly because of the exchange rate between the Dollar and the Iranian Rial. We purchased a perpetual license that we've been using up until now, but I believe that we are not going to update it in the future. Instead, we plan to find another third-party to support us with the license, in the sense that we would have access to their license as a shared agreement."

"The pricing depends on our perspective, our budget, and, of course, the competitors we are taking into account."

"They offer a fair price for a robust solution."

"Its subscription cost is too much, and sometimes, it is very difficult to pitch the solution to the management for cost approval. If the cost is reduced a little bit, it would be easier. If its cost was less, many other organizations that currently cannot afford it would be able to use this technology. I'm sure many organizations around the globe are having issues with identity management, and it is a very difficult task for IT to manage privileged accounts."

"One Identity Safeguard is expensive and the cost goes up as we scale."

"Our licensing costs are on a yearly basis."

"Compared to CyberArk, the tool is very cheap."