Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

One Identity Safeguard vs Symantec Privileged Access Manager comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 6, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
4.3
Symantec Privileged Access Manager's customer service receives mixed reviews, with praise for support but concerns about response times and expertise.
 

Room For Improvement

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
3.5
Symantec Privileged Access Manager suffers from weak rule management, limited reporting, poor integration, and has scalability and support issues.
Delinea is better than Symantec Privileged Access Manager in terms of security and features.
 

Scalability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.8
Symantec Privileged Access Manager excels in scalability for large enterprises, though identity management and peak usage issues need addressing.
 

Setup Cost

No sentiment score available
No sentiment score available
Symantec Privileged Access Manager offers competitive pricing influenced by licensing and infrastructure costs, with planning and negotiation essential.
Symantec Privileged Access Manager is potentially cheaper than other solutions.
 

Stability Issues

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.3
Symantec Privileged Access Manager is generally stable, with occasional initial challenges and Java-related issues reported by users.
 

Valuable Features

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
8.1
Symantec Privileged Access Manager enhances security with access controls, seamless integration, and user-friendly management of privileged credentials.
The agent-based credential management solution allows clients to programmatically use the agent to collect passwords during runtime from Symantec Privileged Access Manager.
 

Categories and Ranking

One Identity Safeguard
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
3rd
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
40
Ranking in other categories
User Entity Behavior Analytics (UEBA) (6th)
Symantec Privileged Access ...
Ranking in Privileged Access Management (PAM)
21st
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
52
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Privileged Access Management (PAM) category, the mindshare of One Identity Safeguard is 4.5%, down from 5.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Symantec Privileged Access Manager is 1.7%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Privileged Access Management (PAM)
 

Featured Reviews

Tor Nordhagen - PeerSpot reviewer
Transparent mode for privileged sessions will greatly simplify our client's administrative situation
We're introducing the solution's transparent mode for privileged sessions. This is part of what the client hasn't used before. It will simplify their administrative situation greatly. So far, the rollout of this feature has been a seamless process, but we're still in the midst of rolling it out. The benefits will be on the risk side. Right now, the way accounts are managed, you don't necessarily know who is using an account. There's a shared admin account, and that's not a good thing. And those accounts are shared in wallets by several people. One of the real benefits of safeguarding here is that the client will have an absolute audit of who is using an administrative interface, whether it's server or network.
Krishnan Srinivasan - PeerSpot reviewer
Enhances credential management and relatively inexpensive but needs feature improvements
I work for a service provider company, and we implement Symantec Privileged Access Manager solutions for our clients, which include various banking and mining clients We have implemented both the remote access and credential management features. The agent-based credential management solution…
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions are best for your needs.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
22%
Financial Services Firm
12%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
Financial Services Firm
18%
Computer Software Company
17%
Manufacturing Company
16%
Government
9%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about One Identity Safeguard?
The identity discovery is good, and the performance is pretty good value.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for One Identity Safeguard?
One Identity Safeguard is expensive. The license is around $3,000 per month.
What needs improvement with One Identity Safeguard?
One Identity's support is not appropriately structured, and it has a lot of room to improve.
What do you like most about Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
We can check the activities in the server for fragile files and documents in case of any issues.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
Pricing is reasonable. It's neither as expensive as BeyondTrust nor as cheap as other solutions. One can negotiate corporate discounts through franchises, as Broadcom manages most customers through...
What needs improvement with Symantec Privileged Access Manager?
Broadcom has neglected product development since acquiring Symantec, and nothing major has been added to PAM. The product has not kept up with market demands or introduced new features to compete w...
 

Also Known As

No data available
CA PAM, Xceedium Xsuite, CA Privileged Access Manager
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Cavium
NEOVERA, Telesis, eSoft
Find out what your peers are saying about One Identity Safeguard vs. Symantec Privileged Access Manager and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
816,636 professionals have used our research since 2012.