OneSpan DIGIPASS vs Thales Authenticators comparison

OneSpan and Thales Cloud Security are both solutions in the Authentication Systems category. OneSpan is ranked #23, while Thales Cloud Security is ranked #16 with an average rating of 8.0. OneSpan holds a 1.5% mindshare in AS, compared to Thales Cloud Security’s 2.6% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OneSpan users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of Thales Cloud Security users who would recommend it.

OneSpan DIGIPASS

Read 1 OneSpan DIGIPASS review

767 Views
639 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Thales Authenticators

Read 6 Thales Authenticators reviews

1,292 Views
1,138 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OneSpan DIGIPASS

Thales Authenticators

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between OneSpan DIGIPASS and Thales Authenticators based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems.

To learn more, read our detailed Authentication Systems Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,067 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

OneSpan DIGIPASS

Ranking in Authentication Systems

23rd

Average Rating

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Thales Authenticators

Ranking in Authentication Systems

16th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Authentication Systems category, the mindshare of OneSpan DIGIPASS is 1.5%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Thales Authenticators is 2.6%, up from 2.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Authentication Systems

Featured Reviews

it_user1406394

Technical Lead Specialist at Hitachi Systems, Ltd.

Good authentication options, but the setup can be complex and the user interface should be improved

Many of the users with licenses are not getting their IPs all of the time. It seems that the licenses are not active on the user end. There are multiple errors. At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code. The user interface could be improved. The setup could be simplified. The mobile app that is available for Digipass does not scan the QR code to activate the license. Users would like to see more functions and creation options for the user base and the UI console. They are not getting all of the features that are available on the UI Console. The features are the same but they are not able to configure them.

Read full review

Gustavo Merighi

Automation and Telecommunications Analyst at Grupo Energisa

Has an easy-to-use management interface and a straightforward initial setup process

Our primary use cases include multifactor authentication for VPN connections and access to security tools like jump servers and firewalls. We also use it to enhance security measures in an enterprise environment The most valuable feature is the YAML 2.0 integration. It has an easy-to-use…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"OneSpan Digipass is very useful, easy to use and work with."

"We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon."

"Scalable and stable."

"I like how the solution allows me to support different types of hardware tokens and integrate with OTP."

"The most valuable feature of SafeNet Authentication Manager is authentication."

"One valuable feature is Thales' ability to provide off-site tokens."

"The technical support services are good."

Cons

"At times, when the user is trying to scan and activate the license, it comes up with an error code."

"The problem with SafeNet is that it's not integrated with Microsoft 365."

"The solution should allow for support of multi-tenant architecture."

"The product could be improved by adding more features for sending tokens via SMS or phone calls."

"The stability could improve."

"We faced issues due to slow ticket responses, which improved over time."

"Lacks integration with other platforms."

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available

"There is an annual licensing fee."

"Thales is more expensive than its competitors."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Authentication Systems solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

23%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Wholesaler/Distributor

Computer Software Company

15%

Financial Services Firm

14%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Government

10%

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about Thales Authenticators?

We use this solution to log into virtual machines like VMware and VMware Horizon.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Thales Authenticators?

Currently, the solution fulfills our requirements. We are very satisfied with its features, and do not have any specific ideas for improvement right now. Perhaps, in the future, three-factor authen...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Thales Authenticators?

Our employees, whether working on-site or remotely, use Thales Authenticators for two-factor authentication to log in to their laptops or PCs. This is our primary use case.

See all answers

Comparisons

Yubico YubiKey vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 35% of the time

Fortinet FortiAuthenticator vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 21% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 19% of the time

Cisco Duo vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 16% of the time

RSA SecurID vs OneSpan DIGIPASS

Compared 9% of the time

More OneSpan DIGIPASS Competitors

Yubico YubiKey vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 30% of the time

Microsoft Entra ID vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 13% of the time

Cisco Duo vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 10% of the time

Utimaco SecurityServer vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 10% of the time

Atalla Hardware Security Module vs Thales Authenticators

Compared 6% of the time

More Thales Authenticators Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

December 2024

Download OneSpan DIGIPASS product report

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

December 2024

Download Thales Authenticators product report

Also Known As

VASCO DIGIPASS, DIGIPASS

Gemalto Ezio, Ezio, Gemalto Authenticators, SafeNet Authentication Manager

Learn More

OneSpan

Thales Cloud Security

Overview

DIGIPASS authenticators are the most effective first-line-of-defense and have a proven record of stopping hacking attacks.

Offering the broadest range of authentication methods and form factors, Thales allows customers to address numerous use cases, assurance levels, and threat vectors with unified, centrally managed policies—managed from one authentication back end delivered in the cloud or on premise.

Sample Customers

AGBank, Odeabank, Bradesco, Briggs and Morgan, Caixa Galicia, Chicago Clearing House Association, Diamond Bank Plc, DnB NOR, Document Centric Solutions

Standard Chartered Bank (SCB)

Buyer's Guide

Authentication Systems

December 2024

Download Free Report

Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Fortinet and others in Authentication Systems. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best Authentication Systems vendors.

We monitor all Authentication Systems reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.