OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs SAP Signavio Process Manager comparison

OpenText and SAP are both solutions in the Business Process Management (BPM) category. OpenText is ranked #26 with an average rating of 8.3, while SAP is ranked #8 with an average rating of 7.6. OpenText holds a 0.4% mindshare in BPM, compared to SAP’s 7.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 89% of SAP users who would recommend it.

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Read 13 OpenText 360 for SharePoint reviews

612 Views
457 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Read 59 SAP Signavio Process Manager reviews

7,347 Views
4,858 Comparison Views

89% willing to recommend

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

OpenText 360 for SharePoint and SAP Signavio Process Manager are both leading solutions in document management and process management, respectively. OpenText 360 for SharePoint is often seen as the more cost-effective option with better customer support, whereas SAP Signavio's advanced features make it preferable for those seeking superior capabilities.

Features: OpenText 360 emphasizes document management integration, enhancing workflows and collaboration in Microsoft environments, and provides strong search and performance capabilities. SAP Signavio excels in process modeling and analysis, offering compliance and efficiency analytics with user-friendly collaboration tools.

Room for Improvement: OpenText 360 could improve in offering more advanced process management capabilities and integration flexibility outside SharePoint. SAP Signavio may need enhancements in cost management, deployment complexity, and real-time collaboration efficiency.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText 360 benefits from easy integration within Microsoft ecosystems and is praised for its responsive customer service. SAP Signavio offers flexible, cloud-based deployment adaptable to various IT setups, with comprehensive support to address its complex offerings.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText 360 is generally viewed as a more affordable solution with a faster ROI, especially for SharePoint-heavy organizations. SAP Signavio, while having higher initial costs, delivers significant long-term value through its robust process optimization features and potential for greater ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

26th

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

SAP Signavio Process Manager

Ranking in Business Process Management (BPM)

8th

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Business Process Design (5th)

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Business Process Management (BPM) category, the mindshare of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is 0.4%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of SAP Signavio Process Manager is 7.5%, up from 5.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Business Process Management (BPM)

Featured Reviews

Ravi Krishnan S

Head - Financial Reporting and Taxation at TVS Capital Funds

Has a strong and easy integration with Teams but the workflows could be more intuitive

OpenText 360 for SharePoint helps us with work and document management. We have all the functions and files of private equity firms stored according to particular investment portfolios. It handles all the document workflows and logging activities The product has a strong and easy integration with…

Read full review

Cirvesh-Daga

Director at T-Systems International GmbH

Good visual representation for modelling and business process mapping but room for improvement in reporting functionalities

There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting. That would be my recommendation for any OEM in this value chain. Reporting could definitely be improved. I would like to see new features in analytics. I like that they analyze the process and give it to me visually, but I'd like the option to use DPMM instead of just DPC. I'd also like the option to have the process map laid out top to bottom instead of horizontally. Especially a choice between DPMN and EPC as a format. Because there are some people who are very comfortable with the EPC notation. The process is very clearly event-driven. There's an event, there's an action. It's very simple to understand. BPMN, which is the most popular business process notation, generally tends to have multiple frames. Actually, in multiple swimlanes rather. And those frames could each represent a particular kind of entity. Maybe it's an action, maybe it's an actor, maybe it's an event. So there are two different ways of notation. I just like Signavio to give us the ability to choose that notation. Because some companies use BPMN and some use the EPC. And then, if the minute you make that change, I'd like them to give us the flexibility of having an already plotted or vertically plotted option. Moreover, I would like to see improvement in the visual part. It's the piece that needs improvement. Currently, you can plot the diagram horizontally or vertically. However, I'd like the option to change the way the diagram is created, like switching between different notations.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product has a strong and easy integration with Teams."

"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."

"It has a lot of flexibility, and Microsoft does come up with some new additions from time to time."

"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."

"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."

"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."

"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."

"The fact that you can see and create something that fits your business is the most valuable thing in this platform. It is a customizable product, so it fits your needs."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint pros

"The collaboration hub is good because it allows us to share the models that we've captured and to get comments back, and we don't all have to be in the same room, it can be remote and over time."

"It's easy and fast. It's very quick to work with process teams in terms of improving processes. You just have to send them a URL and to have a process in front of them. I don't use all of the possibilities we have in Signavio. This has made it easier for people to adopt, because when we scrambled the process team together and started a process of improvement, it improved their process. They are much more involved than they had been earlier, and they can also use Signavio to make smaller improvements in the process for themselves. There are many more interactions between the process teams and Signavio than in our previous solution, where you had to hire in a professional process modeler. It's been a great improvement."

"We could increase the transparency and speed for the new ERP introduction. The status and changes by the new system are now clear to everybody and it is a great tool to train the people."

"The formatting features are quite good because you can create very complex models, but you can easily clean them up so that they look very nice."

"The ability to leave comments in the Collaboration Hub is a good and easy way for the employees to give feedback on the processes."

"The solution is user-friendly."

"For the collaboration functions, we use the commenting and quick model functions for process owners who don't have specific knowledge about Process Manager."

"The interface is very intuitive and includes a drag-and-drop function."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pros

Cons

"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."

"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."

"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."

"I would like for there to be even more integrations in the next release and I believe that the price could go down a bit."

"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."

"The user interface could definitely be improved."

"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."

"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."

More OpenText 360 for SharePoint cons

"The user administration, the user-group administration, and the license models need improvement."

"For me, given I've got a lot of experience working with BPMN and other process management tools, in terms of the interface, I think there's a little bit more that can be improved to match what the conventional BPMN offers. I've been constantly trying to give this feedback to Signavio, to let them know that it needs to be more coherent with the original BPMN version of the stencil."

"There is room for improvement in analytics. People don't realize it, but the world has changed in the last six to eight months. Customers want to see AI like ChatGPT and ML capabilities in all aspects of business processes and reporting."

"I think the intuitive handling is an issue which they should be more focused on, especially as we have issues with the glossary. If you want to implement Signavio within procedures in contact with other software, it's quite difficult to integrate and you will have several points where you have to double and triple the work, because you cannot maintain the data centrally. With other solutions, we can integrate it and have only one data transfer, to import and export with other solutions. A glossary is still limiting us."

"The reporting is too slow and there is a limit of 250 processes."

"The solution’s pricing could be improved."

"One of the most important points in Signavio that would be a great change would be the management of variants of the process."

"We sometimes experience downtime or a dropped connection, so I think that the stability can be improved for the SaaS solution."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The solution has a very complex pricing model."

"On-premises version is expensive"

"OpenText 360's price varies depending on how long you've been a customer, how many licenses you have, and which products you use."

"It has a reasonable price."

"There is a license needed to use OpenText 360 for SharePoint and we pay annually. The price of the solution could be less expensive."

"SharePoint uses a subscription model."

"Its price is reasonable, but its licensing is very complex. This platform contains a number of pieces, and you have to be an expert in reading all the conditions in the license. They should simplify its licensing."

"Pricing is a part of the enterprise agreement that we have."

"It is expensive. The license is monthly."

"I rate the product price a five on a scale of one to ten, where one is low price and ten is high price."

"SAP is always more expensive. The per-user cost is hard to calculate and forecast for a big company."

"My client purchased one editor license and the collaboration hub, which covers up to a hundred people."

"We are only able to use the free academic licenses because we have a financial constraint. We are not able to pay for commercial licenses to use this kind of tool."

"Although Signavio is a feature-rich solution, it is expensive for companies who haven’t reached a certain maturity level in their process management initiatives."

"I think that the price of the licenses is between $2,000 USD and $3,000 USD per license per year, plus the hub usage. I cannot remember the exact cost, but it is affordable."

"This solution provides really great value for the money."

More SAP Signavio Process Manager pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Business Process Management (BPM) solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Government

13%

Legal Firm

Computer Software Company

Manufacturing Company

14%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Computer Software Company

10%

Energy/Utilities Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

We concentrate on the legal industry, such as legal libraries. It's the most structured solution we have used and implemented for five years.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The price is not cheap but entirely reasonable.

See all answers

What needs improvement with OpenText 360 for SharePoint?

The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive.

See all answers

Which is better - Signavio Process Manager or Celonis?

SAP Signavio Process Manager is a very robust industrial-grade business process modeling tool. It is easy to use and does not require too much technological involvement. This solution has a collabo...

See all answers

What do you like most about Signavio Process Manager?

The visual representation is extremely powerful and easy to use in process modeling and analysis. I can show it to someone who doesn't know business process mapping, and they still understand bec...

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Signavio Process Manager?

Due to its SaaS nature, it is slightly challenging as a BPM tool. The pricing could be reduced further. I don't have the exact figures, but I believe it can be lowered because it's cloud-based.

See all answers

Comparisons

No data available

Celonis vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 23% of the time

ARIS BPA vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 14% of the time

Camunda vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 8% of the time

ADONIS vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 6% of the time

UiPath Process Mining vs SAP Signavio Process Manager

Compared 4% of the time

More SAP Signavio Process Manager Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint

January 2025

Download OpenText 360 for SharePoint product report

Buyer's Guide

SAP Signavio Process Manager

December 2024

Download SAP Signavio Process Manager product report

Also Known As

Process 360, Global 360, OpenText Process 360

Signavio Process Editor

Learn More

OpenText

Video not available

SAP

Overview

With Process360, businesses can take advantage of enterprise process applications delivered on top of SharePoint that also leverage other Microsoft technologies for content management, collaboration, user interface design, and integrated communications.

The Signavio portfolio of web-based business transformation solutions helps companies to understand and optimize all of their business processes quickly and at scale, providing instant insights for informed decision-making. Signavio’s intuitive analysis, change management and execution solutions around process excellence include use cases like digital transformation, operational excellence and customer-centricity, placing them at the heart of global organizations.

Over 1 million users in more than 1,500 organizations worldwide rely on Signavio products to make processes part of their company’s DNA. Headquartered in Berlin, Germany, Signavio was founded in 2009 to address the need for a collaborative approach to process management.

Signavio was acquired by SAP in the first quarter of 2021. For more information, visit www.signavio.com

Sample Customers

iTAC Software, AG Alcatel-Lucent, Pacific Life, Deutsche Verbindungsstelle Krankenversicherung Ausland (DVKA)

DHL, Coca Cola EP, Prudential, Zalando, T-Systems, Jabil, Endress+Hauser, Rakuten

Buyer's Guide

OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

January 2025

Free Report: OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText 360 for SharePoint vs. SAP Signavio Process Manager report.

See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.

We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.