Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

OpenText Business Processing Testing vs Tricentis Tosca comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 18, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

No sentiment score available
Sentiment score
7.1
Tricentis Tosca offers significant ROI and testing efficiency, ideal for large companies but less beneficial for short-term projects.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
4.8
OpenText's customer service is decent, but technical support is inefficient and lacks expertise compared to Tricentis Tosca.
Sentiment score
6.9
Tricentis Tosca's customer service is praised for responsiveness but criticized for delays and inconsistent resolution times.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.8
Users highlight the importance of a dedicated framework team and setup for successful scalability and effective project expansion.
Sentiment score
7.3
Tricentis Tosca is highly scalable for various applications, though there are some infrastructure and licensing cost challenges.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
OpenText Business Processing Testing is stable and versatile, integrating well with Jenkins despite minor web element challenges.
Sentiment score
7.5
Tricentis Tosca is stable, reliable, and highly rated, despite occasional minor issues with environment, network, and cloud storage.
 

Room For Improvement

OpenText Business Processing Testing needs faster execution, better navigation, and more guidance to improve usability and integration.
Tricentis Tosca needs improvements in integrations, performance, UI testing, AI features, mobile support, and better customer support.
 

Setup Cost

Tricentis Tosca's high licensing costs and complexity are often prohibitive for smaller organizations but beneficial for large enterprises.
 

Valuable Features

OpenText Business Processing Testing offers modular, scalable automated tests, enabling seamless collaboration between technical and non-technical users.
Tricentis Tosca excels in scriptless automation, model-based testing, and ease of use, making it ideal for comprehensive testing.
 

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Business Processin...
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
40th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
7
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Tricentis Tosca
Ranking in Functional Testing Tools
1st
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
107
Ranking in other categories
Mobile App Testing Tools (1st), Regression Testing Tools (1st), API Testing Tools (1st), Test Automation Tools (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Functional Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Business Processing Testing is 0.2%, up from 0.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Tricentis Tosca is 19.2%, up from 14.9% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Functional Testing Tools
 

Featured Reviews

AM
Excellent usability, but the solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with their ALM tool
The solution shouldn't be so tightly integrated with the ALM tool that they have. It should have its own base rather than the repository. If we could save it in other repositories or some other spaces, then that would be a plus. We should also be able to create a BPP script on its own.
Antonio Oteri - PeerSpot reviewer
Ability to automate tests across various platforms and simplifies test creation
From what I've seen with my colleagues who make the software selection, the prices for this software in Brazil are too expensive to be applied to anything but huge customers. I'm surprised because I was in charge of planning and control at the company before, when there was a manager there. Normally, the company has structural licenses that are based on the company they are selling to. I see that these companies cannot spend this money on Tricentis. I think Tosca is losing this type of market. They should have a different license policy for medium and small companies. The same happened in the past with SAP, which changed its policy and also made licenses for low.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Functional Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
14%
Manufacturing Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
13%
Insurance Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
How does Micro Focus UFT One compare to Tricentis Tosca?
We reviewed MicroFocus UFT One but ultimately chose to use Tricentis Tosca because we needed API testing. MicroFocus UFT is a performance and functional testing tool. We tested it, and it was well...
How does Tricentis Tosca compare with Worksoft Certify?
Tosca fulfills our business needs better because it is an end-to-end solution across technologies. We like that it is scriptless, so even non-experienced staff can use it. To put it simply, with To...
What do you like most about Tricentis Tosca?
For beginners, the product is good, especially for those who are interested in the quality side of software testing.
 

Comparisons

No data available
 

Also Known As

Micro Focus Business Process Testing, Business Process Testing, HPE Business Process Testing
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Migros Bank AG
HBO, AMEX, BMW Group, ING, Bosch, Austrian Airlines, Deutsche Bank, Henkel, Allianz, Bank of America, UBS, Orange, Siemens, Swiss Re, Vodafone
Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Business Processing Testing vs. Tricentis Tosca and other solutions. Updated: November 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.