OpenText Silk Test vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

OpenText and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. OpenText is ranked #21 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. OpenText holds a 0.8% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 93% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

OpenText Silk Test

Read 17 OpenText Silk Test reviews

847 Views
563 Comparison Views

93% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,405 Views
1,475 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

OpenText Silk Test

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

OpenText Silk Test and UiPath Test Suite are products in the automated testing solutions category. UiPath Test Suite appears to have the upper hand with superior testing capabilities, although OpenText Silk Test offers more competitive pricing and support services.

Features: OpenText Silk Test stands out with its broad platform support, scripting flexibility, and robust integration capabilities. It also provides good cross-browser testing, especially for JavaScript-heavy applications. UiPath Test Suite stands out with its powerful automation tools, AI integration features, and capability to automate tests across various technologies, offering a comprehensive solution for advanced automation needs.

Room for Improvement: OpenText Silk Test needs enhancement in its advanced feature set to improve its ROI and attract larger enterprises. It could also benefit from more user-friendly interfaces for non-technical users. For UiPath Test Suite, the setup can be streamlined, and its initial cost might deter smaller businesses. Additionally, improving the ease of integration with some enterprise tools could make it more attractive to larger setups.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText Silk Test offers a straightforward deployment process with efficient customer service, ideal for small to medium setups. UiPath Test Suite, though requiring more intricate setup procedures, provides extensive customer support tailored for larger environments, making it suitable for enterprises seeking detailed assistance and scalable solutions.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText Silk Test is known for its lower initial setup cost, making it appealing for smaller budgets, but its ROI remains moderate due to fewer advanced features. UiPath Test Suite requires a higher initial investment yet delivers significant ROI through its advanced capabilities and high scalability, making it favorable for enterprises focused on long-term value.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,265 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText Silk Test

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

21st

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (20th), Regression Testing Tools (9th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText Silk Test is 0.8%, down from 1.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

SrinivasPakala

Director Consulting Expert at Cgi Deutschland KG

Stable, with good statistics and detailed reporting available

While we are performance testing the engineering key, we need to come up with load strategies to commence the test. We'll help to monitor the test, and afterward, we'll help to make all the outcomes, and if they are new, we'll do lots and lots of interpretation and analysis across various servers, to look at response times, and impact. For example, whatever the observations we had during the test, we need to implement it. We'll have to help to catch what exactly is the issues were, and we'll help to see how they can be reduced. Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are. The solution needs better monitoring, especially of CPU.

Read full review

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

Increases productivity compared to other tools

The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The feature I like most is the ease of reporting."

"The statistics that are available are very good."

"A good automation tool that supports SAP functional testing."

"It's easy to automate and accelerate testing."

"The major thing it has helped with is to reduce the workload on testing activities."

"The scalability of the solution is quite good. You can easily expand the product if you need to."

"Scripting is the most valuable. We are able to record and then go in and modify the script that it creates. It has a lot of generative scripts."

"The ability to develop scripts in Visual Studio, Visual Studio integration, is the most valuable feature."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"The Test Manager, the final stage of the UiPath Test Suite, is its most valuable feature."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"The support for automation with iOS applications can be better."

"The solution has a lack of compatibility with newer technologies."

"The pricing could be improved."

"We moved to Ranorex because the solution did not easily scale, and we could not find good and short term third-party help. We needed to have a bigger pool of third-party contractors that we could draw on for specific implementations. Silk didn't have that, and we found what we needed for Ranorex here in the Houston area. It would be good if there is more community support. I don't know if Silk runs a user conference once a year and how they set up partners. We need to be able to talk to somebody more than just on the phone. It really comes right down to that. The generated automated script was highly dependent upon screen position and other keys that were not as robust as we wanted. We found the automated script generated by Ranorex and the other key information about a specific data point to be more robust. It handled the transition better when we moved from computer to computer and from one size of the application to the other size. When we restarted Silk, we typically had to recalibrate screen elements within the script. Ranorex also has some of these same issues, but when we restart, it typically is faster, which is important."

"They should extend some of the functions that are a bit clunky and improve the integration."

"The pricing is an issue, the program is very expensive. That is something that can improve."

"Could be more user-friendly on the installation and configuration side."

"Everything is very manual. It's up to us to find out exactly what the issues are."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"More precise logging would be appreciated."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"The test manager component could be improved."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Our licensing fees are on a yearly basis, and while I think that the price is quite reasonable I am not allowed to share those details."

"We paid annually. There is a purchase cost, and then there is an ongoing maintenance fee."

"Its price is a bit high."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

17%

Manufacturing Company

Energy/Utilities Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Silk Test?

The pricing depends on the license used. The pricing is similar to others in the market.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Silk Test?

The pricing could be improved.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Silk Test?

The product is used for manual, functional, and performance testing. I'm using the tool for loading data into ERP systems.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 46% of the time

Selenium HQ vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 21% of the time

OpenText UFT Developer vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 13% of the time

Qt Squish vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 11% of the time

Apache JMeter vs OpenText Silk Test

Compared 9% of the time

More OpenText Silk Test Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 40% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test

January 2025

Download OpenText Silk Test product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Also Known As

Segue, SilkTest, Micro Focus Silk Test

No data available

Learn More

OpenText

Video not available

UiPath

Overview

SilkTest is robust and portable test automation for web, native, and enterprise software applications. Silk Test's portability enables users to test applications more effectively with lower complexity and cost in comparison to other functional testing tools on the market. Silk Test's role based testing enables business stakeholders, QA engineers, and developers to contribute to the whole automation testing process, which drives collaboration and increases the effectiveness of software testing.

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Sample Customers

Krung Thai Computer Services, Quality Kiosk, Mªller, AVG Technologies

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Free Report: OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,265 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.