SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. SmartBear holds a 6.1% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 75 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,598 Views
3,388 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 24 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,485 Views
1,518 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite both compete in the test automation software category. TestComplete holds the upper hand for users seeking detailed test control, while UiPath is favored for those needing seamless business-friendly integration.

Features: TestComplete supports multiple scripting languages, cross-platform automation, and an efficient Object Browser feature crucial for developing test scripts. It offers desktop, web, and mobile testing with flexible logging. The integration with tools like Jenkins is also beneficial. UiPath Test Suite provides business users with drag-and-drop features, extensive technological support, and an integrated ecosystem. Features like Test Manager and comprehensive automation tools make it advantageous for application testing.

Room for Improvement: TestComplete's web and mobile testing features need refinement due to complexity similar to open-source tools. Licensing issues, language support limitations, and usability performance enhancements are required. UiPath Test Suite should improve its Test Manager and third-party tool integration. User-defined healing processes and AI-driven test case creation also require enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestComplete mainly offers on-premises deployment with limited cloud options, emphasizing robust customer service. User opinions on response times are mixed. UiPath Test Suite offers broad deployment options including public and hybrid clouds, with satisfactory customer service that can improve in resolving technical issues.

Pricing and ROI: TestComplete offers flexible licensing with options for node-locked and floating licenses, though it can be costly when scaling. The initial cost is justified by time savings and automation benefits. UiPath is somewhat expensive, especially with Orchestrator, yet offers significant value through its extensive features. Its pricing model could be more flexible, but it provides good value for enterprises needing comprehensive support.

To learn more, read our detailed SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,640 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (8th), Regression Testing Tools (5th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 6.1%, down from 7.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"I like the cross browser compatibility. It saves a lot of time re-writing scripts to accommodate different browsers."

"The integration with various tools is important."

"The product is stable for what we are currently using it for, and it is sufficient for us."

"The solution is mainly stable."

"The solution helps improve the stability of our product. It also decreases the work of our manual quality assurance engineers."

"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."

"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is its ability to integrate with Azure DevOps for continuous integration and deployment."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It is a very scalable product."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"The document understanding is good."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"At times, identifying or locating an element can be somewhat challenging. However, in a recent test update, they introduced Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability. This introduction has reduced the challenges to some extent, as we can now utilize OCR if the normal method doesn't work. Nevertheless, there is still significant potential for improvement in TestComplete's ability to identify various object elements. I don't have any specific concerns to mention. I have observed significant improvements in TestComplete over the past few years, especially in its support for highly dynamic object elements used in products like Salesforce Dynamics 365. In earlier versions, there were numerous challenges, but the current version is far superior to its predecessors."

"In scenarios where two of our engineers work on the same task, merging codes is a bit difficult."

"Headless testing would be a big improvement."

"During the distribution of our regression test cases, the control IDs are not always recognized correctly."

"What is currently missing from this solution is better support for mobile testing."

"The initial setup of SmartBear TestComplete was complex."

"The solution needs to extend the possibilities so that we can test on other operating systems, platforms and publications for Android as well as iOS."

"The artificial intelligence needs to be improved."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"UiPath could further enhance its functionality by simplifying the test case creation process within Test Suite."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is pretty reasonable."

"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."

"The product is becoming more and more expensive."

"The licensing costs are in the range of $1,000 to $3,000."

"The price is less, compared to other products, such as QTP."

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"The solution's pricing is too high."

"The option we chose was around $2,000 USD."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"Its price is a bit high."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I don't know much about the pricing, however, I think it's cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 22% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 10% of the time

Appium vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 42% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 6% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

January 2025

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Overview

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

SmartBear

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Free Report: SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,640 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.