SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

SmartBear and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. SmartBear is ranked #6 with an average rating of 7.8, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. SmartBear holds a 6.2% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.6% mindshare. Additionally, 87% of SmartBear users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

SmartBear TestComplete

Read 75 SmartBear TestComplete reviews

4,852 Views
3,527 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,405 Views
1,475 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

SmartBear TestComplete

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

SmartBear TestComplete and UiPath Test Suite both compete in the test automation software category. TestComplete holds the upper hand for users seeking detailed test control, while UiPath is favored for those needing seamless business-friendly integration.

Features: TestComplete supports multiple scripting languages, cross-platform automation, and an efficient Object Browser feature crucial for developing test scripts. It offers desktop, web, and mobile testing with flexible logging. The integration with tools like Jenkins is also beneficial. UiPath Test Suite provides business users with drag-and-drop features, extensive technological support, and an integrated ecosystem. Features like Test Manager and comprehensive automation tools make it advantageous for application testing.

Room for Improvement: TestComplete's web and mobile testing features need refinement due to complexity similar to open-source tools. Licensing issues, language support limitations, and usability performance enhancements are required. UiPath Test Suite should improve its Test Manager and third-party tool integration. User-defined healing processes and AI-driven test case creation also require enhancement.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: TestComplete mainly offers on-premises deployment with limited cloud options, emphasizing robust customer service. User opinions on response times are mixed. UiPath Test Suite offers broad deployment options including public and hybrid clouds, with satisfactory customer service that can improve in resolving technical issues.

Pricing and ROI: TestComplete offers flexible licensing with options for node-locked and floating licenses, though it can be costly when scaling. The initial cost is justified by time savings and automation benefits. UiPath is somewhat expensive, especially with Orchestrator, yet offers significant value through its extensive features. Its pricing model could be more flexible, but it provides good value for enterprises needing comprehensive support.

To learn more, read our detailed SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

SmartBear TestComplete

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

6th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (7th), Regression Testing Tools (5th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of SmartBear TestComplete is 6.2%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.6%, up from 1.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Prakhar Goel

Sr Test Lead at Emerson

Used for integration automation, user-based automation, and web automation

The solution's most valuable features are the drag-and-drop feature, keyword-driven approach, and reusability of the scripts. The solution has introduced a new feature that helps us identify objects we cannot normally identify. It gives you a fair idea of objects, resolving the object recognition issue. The solution can be used to perform different tests on different machines.

Read full review

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

Increases productivity compared to other tools

The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Selenium integration."

"The initial setup is pretty easy and it's quick to deploy."

"The solution has a very nice interface."

"Complete works perfectly with CUTE. That includes all dialogues, right-click menus, or system dialogues, etc., which are handled well."

"I like the cross browser compatibility. It saves a lot of time re-writing scripts to accommodate different browsers."

"It works very fine. It is fast on almost any machine, and it is also very well organized. I like its object mapping and its capability to find and interact with almost everything that exists on Windows."

"TestComplete fits almost perfectly with a large amount of stacks, such as Delphi, C#, Java and web applications."

"When compared to other tools, it is very simple."

More SmartBear TestComplete pros

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"It is a very scalable product."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"UiPath Test Suite is user-friendly and operates as a low-code platform."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"The way objects are added and used when utilizing descriptive programming could be improved. It is a little unwieldy, compared to UFT."

"Right now, when you buy the solution, you need to pay for one solution. You receive one set up and you install it and it's just in that one machine. It would be ideal if they could offer one subscription where you can connect to different machines with a group subscription."

"It is very hard to read the test log generated by TestComplete Executor if the log file is very big. TestComplete Executor is a small tool for just running the TestComplete test framework (not for developing)."

"The solution’s customer support should be improved."

"SmartBear products generally have a weak link when it comes to integration with other test management tools like Inflectra."

"At times, identifying or locating an element can be somewhat challenging. However, in a recent test update, they introduced Optical Character Recognition (OCR) capability. This introduction has reduced the challenges to some extent, as we can now utilize OCR if the normal method doesn't work. Nevertheless, there is still significant potential for improvement in TestComplete's ability to identify various object elements. I don't have any specific concerns to mention. I have observed significant improvements in TestComplete over the past few years, especially in its support for highly dynamic object elements used in products like Salesforce Dynamics 365. In earlier versions, there were numerous challenges, but the current version is far superior to its predecessors."

"Error handling features in the tool are a little limited."

"Headless testing would be a big improvement."

More SmartBear TestComplete cons

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"The pricing isn't as low as other options."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Overall, for us, the cost of the TestComplete platform and the three extra modules is around $8,000."

"We have a TestComplete 12 license."

"Our ROI is about $10,000 a year."

"The solution's licensing cost has increased because it has moved to some new SLM-based licenses."

"TestComplete now have come up with three modules (Web, Desktop & Mobile), so based on the type of product for automation, it is adequate to purchase the required module."

"The license price for a physical machine is cheap, and for virtual machine, it is very expensive."

"The price of SmartBear TestComplete could be less. The main challenge is when it comes to node-locked. They should use a subscription model, such as a monthly-based subscription or, a quarterly-based subscription. Their floating license is very expensive, and this high price should be reduced or provide, at a minimum, a subscription model."

"The solution is around $1500. Some are perpetual licenses, and some get a yearly report card."

More SmartBear TestComplete pricing and cost advice

"Its price is a bit high."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

13%

Financial Services Firm

12%

Government

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete has strong reporting capabilities. The reports they generate are really good.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SmartBear TestComplete?

I don't know much about the pricing, however, I think it's cheaper.

See all answers

What needs improvement with SmartBear TestComplete?

The recording function, when using Python, could be improved, as it does not work well in recording testing.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 22% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 11% of the time

Qt Squish vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 10% of the time

Appium vs SmartBear TestComplete

Compared 3% of the time

More SmartBear TestComplete Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 40% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 5% of the time

Katalon Studio vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete

December 2024

Download SmartBear TestComplete product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Learn More

SmartBear

Video not available

UiPath

Overview

What is SmartBear TestComplete?

TestComplete is a reliable, sturdy automated testing platform created by SmartBear Software. SmartBear Software is a worldwide technological leader known for developing quality enterprise-class development and testing solutions.

TestComplete simplifies the process of creating tests for numerous applications, including, but not limited to; Desktop, Android, IOS, Web browsers, and Windows. Application tests can be manual, scripted, and even recorded by using keyword-driven or data-driven functionality. There are even additional options for error reporting and automated playback. The object repository is extremely accurate and is fully customizable. TestComplete can easily be used by experienced developers and even by manual novice testers to develop quality automated UI tests quickly.

TestComplete offers three different testing scenarios:

Desktop: Users can easily and quickly automate UI tests using today’s most popular desktop applications, such as; Windows, Java, Python,.Net, VBScript, and more.
Web: Users can effortlessly create renewable tests for all of today’s popular web applications, including JavaScript frameworks on 2000+ trusted browser and platform integrations.
Mobile: Users can safely build and automate serviceable UI tests on actual or virtual android or IOS devices, locally or in the cloud. Users can create code or codeless tests. TestComplete seamlessly integrates with many of today’s popular frameworks.

Key Features

Easily create automated UI tests: TestComplete offers scriptless Record and Replay or simple keyword-driven tests to quickly develop any type of UI test users may require. Tests can be recorded once, then replayed when needed across various applications on mobile, web, or desktop environments. TestComplete integrates with many different languages, such as Java, Python, C+, and more.
Keyword driven tests: Users can easily divide testing steps, actions, objects, and data with an integrated keyword-driven test structure. This makes it easy for every user to participate in the test automation process; there is no programming experience needed. Everything is made simple with easy-to-use point-and-click options.
Data driven tests: Easily distinguish data from test commands to keep administrative efforts simple. Users can improve overall coverage by running various automated mobile, desktop, or web UI tests.
Record and Replay: Users can reuse created automated tests across every environment as often as desired. This helps to expand overall test coverage and represents a huge cost and time savings.

Reviews from Real Users

Sandhiya T S., Sr Solutions Engineer at Lexington Soft, relates, “The record and replay aspects of the solution are quite useful for people. With them, you don't have to write any scripts. Basically, you can record your actions and play them back later. The initial setup is also very easy.”

Sai S R., Staff Test Architect at a tech services company, says, "The most valuable features of the SmartBear TestComplete are self-healing, they reduce the maintenance required. The different languages SmartBear TestComplete supports are good because some of our libraries are written in Python, JavaScript, and C#. It's very easy to put them all under one project and use them."

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Sample Customers

Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit, and Thomson Reuters.

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

December 2024

Free Report: SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.