Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
UiPath Test Suite Logo

Top 10 UiPath Test Suite Alternatives

Vendor: UiPath
4.0 out of 5
Post review

Top UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to UiPath Test Suite based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, and OpenText UFT One. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

UiPath Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with UiPath, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Tricentis Tosca
4.1 out of 5
Tricentis Tosca offers a user-friendly, scriptless approach with strong model-based test automation, ideal for non-technical users. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite's comprehensive integration and AI with RPA make it versatile and cost-effective, appealing to smaller enterprises seeking seamless technology automation.
Download Tricentis Tosca vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Tricentis Tosca has a straightforward setup cost outlined in product_a_reviews_section, while UiPath Test Suite's setup cost is highlighted in product_b_reviews_section, showing distinct differences in initial financial commitment between the two testing solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Tricentis Tosca has a straightforward setup cost outlined in product_a_reviews_section, while UiPath Test Suite's setup cost is highlighted in product_b_reviews_section, showing distinct differences in initial financial commitment between the two testing solutions.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Katalon Studio
3.9 out of 5
Katalon Studio offers flexibility with features like Object Spy and data-driven testing, suitable for various platforms including web, mobile, and API testing. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite enhances business process automation with comprehensive technology support and strong integration with other UiPath products.
Download Katalon Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
View comparison
Pricing
There is no cost for setup or licensing.
This product is freeware, so there is no charge for using it.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
OpenText UFT One
4.0 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
OpenText UFT One
4.0 out of 5
OpenText UFT One offers extensive technology support, including platforms like Oracle and SAP, with robust testing frameworks and broad coverage. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite excels in low-code functionalities and lifecycle tool integration, appealing to those seeking flexibility and cost-effectiveness.
Download OpenText UFT One vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
OpenText UFT One setup cost is typically higher, focusing on enterprise-level features, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more flexible pricing model, appealing to businesses looking for scalable testing solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText UFT One setup cost is typically higher, focusing on enterprise-level features, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more flexible pricing model, appealing to businesses looking for scalable testing solutions.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
UiPath Test Suite Logo
SmartBear TestComplete
3.8 out of 5
SmartBear TestComplete focuses on dynamic methods, cross-platform automation, and a robust object browser, aiming for comprehensive automation. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite emphasizes integration, low-code automation, and business process adaptability, targeting extensive automation needs with intuitive tools.
Download SmartBear TestComplete vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
SmartBear TestComplete features more economical setup costs, while UiPath Test Suite has a higher initial investment, highlighting noticeable differences in their pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
SmartBear TestComplete features more economical setup costs, while UiPath Test Suite has a higher initial investment, highlighting noticeable differences in their pricing strategies.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Eggplant Test
3.9 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Eggplant Test
3.9 out of 5
Eggplant Test appeals with platform independence and ease of scripting, providing high ROI by reducing manual tests. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite enhances automation efficiency, offering integration capabilities and broad feature sets suitable for diverse environments, also ensuring substantial ROI through improved testing processes.
Download Eggplant Test vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Eggplant Test involves a higher initial setup cost, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more economical setup, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
View comparison
Pricing
Eggplant Test involves a higher initial setup cost, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more economical setup, highlighting distinct pricing strategies.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Worksoft Certify
4.2 out of 5
Worksoft Certify offers script-free testing, ideal for SAP, emphasizing reusability. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite excels in test management and robotic process automation. Worksoft's higher cost is offset by ROI, while UiPath offers cost-effectiveness with diverse deployment options.
Download UiPath Test Suite vs. Worksoft Certify Report
Worksoft Certify involves higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced integration capabilities, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more budget-friendly setup, which may appeal to teams seeking cost-efficient test automation.
View comparison
Pricing
Worksoft Certify involves higher initial costs, reflecting its advanced integration capabilities, while UiPath Test Suite offers a more budget-friendly setup, which may appeal to teams seeking cost-efficient test automation.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Ranorex Studio
4.0 out of 5
Ranorex Studio offers user-friendly automation with extensive libraries, ideal for both technical and non-technical users, despite Windows focus. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite provides a comprehensive feature set with flexible deployment options, appealing to businesses needing integration across diverse technologies.
Download Ranorex Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Ranorex Studio incurs a lower setup cost, highlighting its budget-friendly approach, whereas UiPath Test Suite demands a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
View comparison
Pricing
Ranorex Studio incurs a lower setup cost, highlighting its budget-friendly approach, whereas UiPath Test Suite demands a higher initial investment, reflecting its comprehensive features.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Testim
4.6 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Testim
4.6 out of 5
Testim offers ease of use with AI-driven test creation, appealing to teams seeking rapid automation and cost-effective options. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite attracts enterprises with its robust features, extensive integration, and scalability, justifying its higher price and promising long-term ROI.
Download Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Testim offers a straightforward setup cost, ideal for smaller teams, while UiPath Test Suite has higher setup expenses, catering to larger enterprises with complex needs.
View comparison
Pricing
Testim offers a straightforward setup cost, ideal for smaller teams, while UiPath Test Suite has higher setup expenses, catering to larger enterprises with complex needs.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Qt Squish
4.4 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Qt Squish
4.4 out of 5
Qt Squish offers robust cross-platform GUI testing with strong scripting capabilities, appealing to those prioritizing GUI across various OS. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite excels in comprehensive end-to-end automation and seamless integration, making it ideal for businesses seeking broader automation across processes.
Download Qt Squish vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Qt Squish offers a more cost-effective setup compared to the higher investment required for UiPath Test Suite, highlighting a notable difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Qt Squish offers a more cost-effective setup compared to the higher investment required for UiPath Test Suite, highlighting a notable difference in initial expenditure between the two solutions.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
UiPath Test Suite Logo
OpenText UFT Developer
3.7 out of 5
OpenText UFT Developer integrates well with Java and C# environments, ideal for teams needing legacy system support. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite offers extensive lifecycle tool integration and ease of use, appealing to diverse users with minimal coding requirements.
Download OpenText UFT Developer vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
OpenText UFT Developer requires significant setup investment, while UiPath Test Suite offers a cost-effective setup option. Each solution caters to different budget needs, highlighting economic flexibility versus a premium upfront expenditure.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText UFT Developer requires significant setup investment, while UiPath Test Suite offers a cost-effective setup option. Each solution caters to different budget needs, highlighting economic flexibility versus a premium upfront expenditure.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
OpenText Silk Test
3.8 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
OpenText Silk Test
3.8 out of 5
OpenText Silk Test attracts tech buyers with its reasonable pricing and strong customer support, ideal for budget-conscious companies. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite appeals to those needing advanced features and integrations, offering greater flexibility and a potentially higher ROI long-term.
Download OpenText Silk Test vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
OpenText Silk Test offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while UiPath Test Suite has a higher setup cost requiring additional investment.
View comparison
Pricing
OpenText Silk Test offers a straightforward setup with moderate initial costs, while UiPath Test Suite has a higher setup cost requiring additional investment.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Telerik Test Studio
4.0 out of 5
Telerik Test Studio offers strong web and desktop test automation with intuitive features, making it suitable for controlled environments. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite excels in RPA integration and cloud deployment, catering to complex enterprise needs with robust flexibility and integration capabilities.
Download Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report
Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while UiPath Test Suite presents higher setup expenses but includes extensive integration features.
View comparison
Pricing
Telerik Test Studio offers a straightforward setup with lower initial costs, while UiPath Test Suite presents higher setup expenses but includes extensive integration features.
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Opkey
1 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
Opkey
1 out of 5

By following the principles of Automated Test First development, OpKey enables manual testers and SMEs in Agile teams to write automated tests as the features are being developed. Then using its patent pending Tool Agnostic engine, Opkey executes these tests with any automation tool that you have (selenium, HP UFT, Sahi, IBM RFT or any of the 8 tool that we support). You can execute your tests locally, on OpKey CLoud or popular servcies like Sauce Labs and Browser Stack.

View comparison
UiPath Test Suite Logo
ZAPTEST
4.2 out of 5
UiPath Test Suite Logo
ZAPTEST
4.2 out of 5
ZAPTEST offers cost-effective, straightforward deployment and cross-platform testing for comprehensive end-to-end automation, attracting budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, UiPath Test Suite provides extensive integration capabilities with higher investment, appealing to those seeking robust features and long-term value.
Download UiPath Test Suite vs. ZAPTEST Report
ZAPTEST has minimal setup costs, whereas UiPath Test Suite involves a more significant initial investment. This stark difference may influence budget-conscious users when choosing a suitable automated testing solution.
View comparison
Pricing
ZAPTEST has minimal setup costs, whereas UiPath Test Suite involves a more significant initial investment. This stark difference may influence budget-conscious users when choosing a suitable automated testing solution.

Related categories

Test Automation Tools
Functional Testing Tools
Mobile App Testing Tools