Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.3
Qt Squish reduced manual testing time, enabled agile cycles, improved efficiency, and optimized processes with stable automation suites.
Sentiment score
8.1
UiPath Test Suite delivered rapid ROI with reduced costs, quick deployment, and decreased developer reliance despite high licensing fees.
For the part that has been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.9
Qt Squish's customer service is efficient and knowledgeable, with quick responses, but video support can be expensive.
Sentiment score
7.9
UiPath Test Suite customer service is highly rated for its responsiveness and effectiveness, though premium support costs concern some users.
Support should be free, especially for product-related issues.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.2
Qt Squish is praised for scalability, especially with floating licenses, but some face minor issues like image recognition glitches.
Sentiment score
7.2
UiPath Test Suite excels in automation scalability and regression testing despite connectivity challenges and licensing affecting access.
With one license, just one user or one test scenario can be run at a time.
Proper knowledge of Orchestrator and CI/CD processes makes the product truly scalable.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.0
Users report high stability with Qt Squish, experiencing minimal issues, which are quickly resolved by support and updates.
Sentiment score
7.8
UiPath Test Suite is mostly stable and reliable, with minor issues in non-string variables, server delays, and cloud performance.
UiPath Test Suite has matured over the years and is now quite stable.
 

Room For Improvement

Qt Squish needs improvements in object identification, testing stability, integration, and enhanced support for non-Qt applications while addressing pricing and speed issues.
UiPath Test Suite needs improved usability, better automation capabilities, enhanced logging, and cost-effective solutions for optimal test management.
If you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java.
UiPath should introduce compatibility so existing processes in Selenium or other tools can work seamlessly with UiPath Test automation.
 

Setup Cost

Qt Squish receives mixed reviews for its pricing, with high costs and inflexible licensing compared to other tools.
UiPath Test Suite is a premium, feature-rich option, valuable but less flexible and costlier compared to competitors.
For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it.
 

Valuable Features

Qt Squish is a versatile UI testing tool praised for cross-platform support, Python compatibility, and seamless CI integration.
UiPath Test Suite integrates with tools, reduces costs, enhances productivity, supports multiple apps, and offers robust automation.
For the parts that have been automated in Qt, not everything is suitable for automation.
What I really like about UiPath Test Suite is its ability to ensure that any changes made do not affect other functionalities.
 

Categories and Ranking

Qt Squish
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
20
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Test Suite
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Qt Squish is 3.0%, up from 2.6% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.9%, up from 2.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Luc Vangrunderbeeck - PeerSpot reviewer
Testing solution supports Java testing with good reliability
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need the Qt version of Java. You need to set up some special environment variables to be able to do that.
Manigandan Rajavelu - PeerSpot reviewer
Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings
I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
22%
Computer Software Company
16%
Healthcare Company
8%
Transportation Company
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for froglogic Squish?
I'm aware of the price from three or four years ago, and it depends on the number of users. For the developer license, it is about $5200 a year.
What needs improvement with froglogic Squish?
There is nothing you can do for almost every application. If you do it for a single version, it is rather easy. However, if you want to run it for different versions of the software, then you need ...
What is your primary use case for froglogic Squish?
I am not really using the solution during development, however, for regression and automatic regression tests, I am using it. I use it to do visual Qt, which focuses on the GUI part of the applicat...
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
The pricing of UiPath tends to be on the higher side, which can restrict smaller companies from adopting it. Although justified by the solution's capability, excessive costs should not be necessary...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility. Many companies use test automation as an alternative to Selenium but need to develop a fully functional bot in UiPath ...
 

Also Known As

froglogic Squish
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Google, Nokia, Pfizer, Siemens, Synopsys, Airbus, Boeing, Mercedes Benz, Disney, Shell, Reuters, Vodafone, XILINX, GE, Ericsson
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Qt Squish vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
839,319 professionals have used our research since 2012.