Qt Squish vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

"The initial setup process is straightforward."

"I like the dashboard. It's virtual, and you can see the customer results. I can do it at night and in the morning. I think it also automatically emails results."

"Squish is integrated with Qt, which enables us to test the user interface effectively."

"This product can work with QT applications and cross-cut from them on Windows or Mac."

"I find it very user-friendly and easy to start working with. The main benefit for me is that it allows testing applications developed in the Qt language. This capability makes Squish a game-changer, as it's the only tool I've found that enables automation for applications written in Qt. I appreciate three main aspects. Firstly, the documentation is excellent. Secondly, I value the way the tool efficiently locates elements during testing. These are the two aspects I particularly like."

"froglogic Squish is one of the most desired solutions if you are having a Qt as a framework and if you are looking at GUI regression testing. froglogic is a part of Qt as a company."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"What I like most about UiPath Test Suite is that it's straightforward, and any user who knows how to use the UiPath Studio can learn how to create a test script in as fast as thirty minutes. There's nothing new you must learn to use UiPath Test Suite because it only has three sections: Given, Then, and When."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"Test Manager is helpful for tracking process steps. We can see which step is failing."

"The detailed logging is invaluable."

"In terms of integration with other lifecycle tools and applications, UiPath Test Suite works very well because of the basis of RPA, and how RPA and automation can handle different applications and different areas of expertise."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"It is a very scalable product."

"We encountered issues with the embedded environment and building for the Qt version."

"I'm relatively new to Squish, so I'm not familiar with all its pros and cons. Currently, I haven't identified any specific improvements. However, one feature I miss is Git integration within the tool. In my previous experience with Selenium and Python in PyCharm, it was straightforward to create and review changes before pushing them. I haven't found a similar option in Squish, and having an integrated tool for managing conflicts would be beneficial in certain scenarios where collaboration is involved."

"The platform could be improved by implementing some basic functionalities that are frequently used, such as login procedures and screen handling when multiple screens are used at the workplace."

"There had been a lot of improvements with froglogic Squish already. There were some scenarios in which this particular solution was available in different flavors. They have pulled everything together in one solution. There were some monitoring systems, which were missing out from the solution earlier. They have a centralized dashboard for monitoring the test cases and their execution. It's a full-blown solution, there are not many glitches in terms of something missing out of the package."

"The price could be better."

"ID could be improved with suggestions of names, variables or class."

"They could improve the visualization of the product."

"The test manager component could be improved."

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"I don't rate its ability to automate very well."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"The platform is highly-priced."

"It is expensive."

"The price could be better. I believe each developer license costs about 6000 or 7000 Euros per year."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."