Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Opkey vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary
 

Categories and Ranking

Opkey
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
26th
Average Rating
0.0
Number of Reviews
0
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
UiPath Test Suite
Ranking in Test Automation Tools
4th
Average Rating
8.0
Number of Reviews
23
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Opkey is 1.2%, up from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Test Automation Tools
 

Featured Reviews

Deborah Yarosh - PeerSpot reviewer
Sep 13, 2023
Can be used by non-developers, and saves us time, but the manual testing needs improvement
UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment. The QA Manager needs to track which tests have been completed, the success rate, and other relevant information. The ability to have manual tests show up in multiple projects is a requirement that is not easily done in Test Suite. We have submitted the following enhancements request to UiPath and are waiting for them to address these issues before migrating our manual testing to the UiPath Test Suite platform. * Ability to import manual test cases from an Excel Spreadsheet. * Ability to create release folders and have manual tests under the folders (sub-folders are also needed). * Ability to copy tests between projects (manual and automated). * Ability to execute manual test cases in any order and skip tests if needed. * Ability to assign and see who has been assigned to test cases – need to know who created the test case and who executed the test case as they could be different people. * Ability for the QA manager to see which test cases have been run and which haven’t as well as which ones were successful, and which weren’t. * Ability for the QA manager to track defect cycles for a particular release. * Improving Search functionality – must enter the exact test case name in current search functionality. * Ability to extract key data for artifacts for Release Management or Audit* Test Set or Individual Cases, * Include Test Results (passed / failed), * Include how many iterations a test case went through until it passed.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."
"Its price is a bit high."
"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."
"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."
"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."
"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."
"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."
"It represents good value for the investment."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Manufacturing Company
15%
Computer Software Company
15%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Energy/Utilities Company
7%
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Manufacturing Company
10%
Healthcare Company
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Which solution is better for the automation of Oracle Cloud testing: CloudTestr or Opkey?
CloudTestr and Opkey are both popular test automation tools for automating Oracle Cloud testing. Here is a comparison of the two tools: CloudTestr Pros: Cloud-based Easy to use Supports a wide ...
What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?
Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?
Its price is a bit high. I would rate it an eight out of ten for pricing. Most companies are using its licensed version. It has a lot of features such as Document Understanding, AI Center, etc. For...
What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?
It already has many features. No improvement is required currently. We are able to automate most tasks by using UiPath. Its interface is fine. However, its price is a bit high.
 

Learn More

 

Overview

Find out what your peers are saying about Tricentis, OpenText, Katalon Studio and others in Test Automation Tools. Updated: October 2024.
814,763 professionals have used our research since 2012.