Testim vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

Testim and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Testim is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.6, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Testim holds a 4.7% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Testim users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Testim

Read 10 Testim reviews

3,064 Views
2,176 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,405 Views
1,475 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Testim

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Testim and UiPath Test Suite are competitors in the software testing domain. UiPath Test Suite seems to have an upper hand due to its robust features and comprehensive platform, which might meet precise enterprise requirements better.

Features: Testim offers AI-driven test authoring, execution for enhanced stability, record and playback capabilities, and simplicity requiring minimal code. UiPath Test Suite provides advanced automation, integrates with various applications, and features comprehensive tools for recording test cases, generating documentation, and integrating synthetic data. It excels in cross-technology automation, integration, and ultimate scalability.

Room for Improvement: Testim could enhance its feature set to better compete with all-in-one solutions, expand integration capabilities, and provide more customization options for complex workflows. UiPath Test Suite may need to simplify its interface further, reduce the learning curve for non-technical users, and expand its task mining and process mining features to offer more streamlined user experiences.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Testim is easy to deploy with simple integration into existing workflows and offers responsive support. UiPath Test Suite also provides streamlined deployment processes and robust, personalized support, facilitating versatile setups to accommodate varying deployment scenarios effectively.

Pricing and ROI: Testim's competitive pricing offers low initial costs, appealing to budget-conscious buyers and delivering quick ROI through efficient processes. UiPath Test Suite may involve higher costs but offers superior long-term features and scalability, suggesting a higher ROI for complex environments, making it an investment for those prioritizing function depth over initial budget concerns.

To learn more, read our detailed Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Testim

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

7th

Average Rating

9.2

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (12th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Testim is 4.7%, up from 4.1% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

PiyushSingh

Director at Xceedance

A stable tool to help users take care of the implementation phases in their environment

There are a few minor areas where improvements are required, but they are not something that I can discuss at a high level. I will have to ask the team that uses Testim since they can give a better response to what requires improvement in the product. I only manage the team that uses Testim. I cannot be exactly described as an end user of the tool. There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it. There were some trial and error methods our company had to deal with while using the product's documentation, after which we were able to get through the setup phase. I want the documentation to have more information to help users with the setup process. I want the product to be more scalable in the future.

Read full review

Deepak Digar.

QA Manager at Quorum Software

Increases productivity compared to other tools

The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better. Building an automation test case from manual cases is easy, but sometimes we feel the process can get lengthy because we cannot create customized functions and the predefined ones are unsuitable for the particular purpose. We need to do a workaround that involves extra steps. I am unsure how UiPath will help with complex processes because they typically have multiple layers of various technologies. It also depends on the data synchronization. For example, if I have posted something in the front end, how long does it take to be reflected in the back end? That also matters because it's passing through different layers. End-to-end automation will be a little bit tricky because there are multiple front-end and back-end software involved. It is easy for either front-end or back-end testing. If we include the back end and front end to create an end-to-end scenario, it will be difficult because sometimes there are different databases and layers connected.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The ease of learning and the small learning curve allowed us to scale the test scripts and the test suite quickly."

"Testim introduces three services covering validation steps, eliminating the necessity to write complex code."

"I have seen reduced maintenance due to smart locators, as it automatically finds locators for us even with minor application changes."

"The automating smoke and regression tests have become easier and handier and manual efforts are saved."

"The feature I like most about Testim is the record and playback capability, which does not require writing a lot of code."

"It is a highly stable solution."

"The product is easy to use."

"The pre-defined tests are a great help, specifically the custom JS test that allows us to be able to use custom code to test complicated elements or scenarios."

More Testim pros

"The console, in a single pane, allows us to understand where we are in the testing environment."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"It's effective at testing whatever automation we've built or making sure the automation we've built is working fine."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"The document understanding is good."

"It is feature-rich. It has more features than other RPA tools."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"The API testing integration is a bit lacking and can be improved."

"There are common properties between multiple elements that we should be able to edit - such as 'when this step fails,' 'when to run this step,' and 'override timeout'. I should be able to update these properties if I select multiple elements."

"I get a little bit confused while creating new branches."

"Faster scripting would be beneficial, as test creation is faster now."

"In the last couple of months, I have experienced some downtime where it wasn't working."

"There were some issues in the product's initial setup phase in regard to the area of documentation since it wasn't very easy to understand everything mentioned in it."

"The accessibility reporting features could be more robust to be reported at the script level and allow users to map down to the step level."

"The UI could use a better design with a better user experience in mind."

More Testim cons

"If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it."

"UiPath’s Test Suite manual testing doesn’t work for our organization based on how the QA Analysts do their manual testing and the artifacts that are needed for deployment."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"Accessing the full functionality of the Test Suite manager, including the dashboard, requires a tenant license."

"With Selenium, there is a plugin called Healenium, which helps automatically detect changed properties of objects. With one click, it automatically updates the object repository with the changed properties. I would like UiPath to add that capability."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"UiPath needs to improve its Test Manager feature. Defect management and reporting also need improvement."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The tool offers a fixed pricing model for our company."

"I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools."

"The solution is not expensive."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"When we decided to buy the solution three and a half years ago, it was fairly priced."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"Its price is a bit high."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Educational Organization

Manufacturing Company

Computer Software Company

18%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Testim?

The tool's most valuable feature is the recently added AI feature.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Testim?

I rate the product’s pricing an eight out of ten compared to other tools.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Testim?

There is currently no room for improvement that I can identify as of now.

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

Tricentis Tosca vs Testim

Compared 54% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Testim

Compared 23% of the time

Functionize vs Testim

Compared 11% of the time

Testsigma vs Testim

Compared 6% of the time

Applitools vs Testim

Compared 3% of the time

More Testim Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 42% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 22% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 10% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 5% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Testim

January 2025

Download Testim product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Overview

Testim is an end-to-end agile testing automation solution which utilizes machine learning for test authoring, execution, and maintenance. Users can create tests in minutes, run thousands of tests in parallel across different browsers, integrate with their existing CI/CD and collaboration tools, and more.

Testim

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Microsoft, salesforce, JFrog, USA Today, Globality

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Free Report: Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Testim vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.