Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

Progress Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #18 with an average rating of 8.3, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Progress Software holds a 1.0% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.2% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

758 Views
491 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 23 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,283 Views
1,383 Comparison Views

86% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Test Automation Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: October 2024).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

October 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 816,406 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

18th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (17th), Load Testing Tools (13th), Regression Testing Tools (8th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

9.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 1.0%, up from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.2%, up from 1.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Test Suite has multiple tools that are fully integrated. It has everything you need to record your test cases, generate your documentation, and integrate synthetic data with your Orchestrator. I like the integrated aspect of it. The biggest advantage of UiPath is that it not only tests but also integrates with all the other services to offer a complete package."

"Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable."

"It's useful for automating tasks."

"UiPath's most valuable features are reusability and low-code aspects. It works across both desktop and web applications."

"We can generate our own workflow. In our case, it is a report on the PDF file. In the reporting category, we generally verify a couple of things and generate a lot of reports at the end of the day. It provides some useful details about the data captured from the PDF that we can put into an Excel file."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"It has reduced all the deployment cycles of the automation solutions by forty percent."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"I'd like the solution to be even more automated."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

"The product releases sometimes have issues."

"Storing the test scripts is what needs to improve in the UiPath Test Suite, as it's currently a challenge to some extent. Maintaining the files is a bit challenging, especially when you need to keep those locally."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"At FORWARD VI, we see new automations being built around AI and the ability to have developers understand how they can drive some of those AI capabilities with Studio. We are starting to see that. They should also drive that with UiPath Test Suite so that we can not only build that development side faster; we can also develop the tests that go along with it, hopefully automatically."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"I don't necessarily have a problem with the pricing of the UiPath Test Suite, especially because we're using the testing bot licenses as opposed to the unattended licensing."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"The cost of a UiPath Test Suite license for five users is over $10,000 USD."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

19%

Manufacturing Company

18%

Government

13%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Computer Software Company

19%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

10%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Telerik Test Studio?

The way it identifies elements is good.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Telerik Test Studio?

Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy. In addition, sometimes, tests used to fail intermittently. These were the two disadvantages.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Telerik Test Studio?

Instead of Telerik Test Studio, I'd recommend writing test cases in .Net so that in the future, if you move away from Telerik Test Studio to another tool, it would be easier for you. Your current c...

See all answers

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

More precise logging would be appreciated. Additionally, addressing some bugs could improve functionality, and pricing could be more competitive.

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 37% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 15% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 11% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 38% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 22% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 10% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

November 2024

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

October 2024

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Learn More

Progress Software

Video not available

UiPath

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

October 2024

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.