Telerik Test Studio vs UiPath Test Suite comparison

Progress Software and UiPath are both solutions in the Test Automation Tools category. Progress Software is ranked #20 with an average rating of 8.0, while UiPath is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Progress Software holds a 0.9% mindshare in TAt, compared to UiPath’s 4.7% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Progress Software users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 87% of UiPath users who would recommend it.

Telerik Test Studio

Read 5 Telerik Test Studio reviews

682 Views
440 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

UiPath Test Suite

Read 24 UiPath Test Suite reviews

2,485 Views
1,518 Comparison Views

87% willing to recommend

Telerik Test Studio

UiPath Test Suite

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 15, 2024

Telerik Test Studio and UiPath Test Suite compete in software testing automation, with UiPath often having an advantage due to its sophisticated features, while Telerik is appreciated for its affordability and customer support.

Features: Telerik Test Studio is known for intuitive automation capabilities, strong scriptless testing, and Visual Studio integration. UiPath Test Suite stands out with expansive automation features, AI integration, and native RPA testing, providing platform versatility.

Room for Improvement: Telerik Test Studio could enhance advanced features, expand cloud deployment options, and improve AI capabilities. UiPath Test Suite might benefit from reducing setup costs, enhancing customer service response times, and streamlining user interfaces further.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Telerik Test Studio offers on-premise deployment with responsive customer support. UiPath Test Suite provides both cloud and on-premise options but could improve its service response time.

Pricing and ROI: Telerik Test Studio features a straightforward pricing model with lower initial costs, offering high ROI for smaller teams. UiPath Test Suite, while involving higher setup costs, is often a worthwhile investment for organizations aiming to scale automation and testing.

To learn more, read our detailed Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 838,713 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Telerik Test Studio

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

20th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.7

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th), Load Testing Tools (14th), Regression Testing Tools (8th)

UiPath Test Suite

Ranking in Test Automation Tools

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Test Automation Tools category, the mindshare of Telerik Test Studio is 0.9%, down from 0.9% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of UiPath Test Suite is 4.7%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Test Automation Tools

Featured Reviews

Raghvendra Jyothi

Manager Project Management at Capgemini

Very good performance and load testing capabilities

There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test. When we use the solution instead of Microsoft Edge, more scripting is required. The reports for structure point or test management could be more compatible with other tools. For example, when I create an application I sometimes cannot generate a report.

Read full review

Manigandan Rajavelu

Sr software engineer at PricewaterhouseCoopers

Comprehensive, good value for money, and a lot of time savings

I discovered a lot of bugs in UiPath Test Suite. If I publish a test case in Test Manager as well as in Orchestrator, the existing test case does not get replaced. It is appending the test case but not replacing it. We want to replace the existing test case, but this functionality is not available. In Test Manager, there are a lot of defects in the ROI report that we provide to the operations team on a monthly basis. It is not very clear and detailed. There is no detailed explanation of every test case. There is only a high-level overview. We cannot download the report from Test Manager. We have to use some other tool, such as Power BI, to view the data.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"Has a very smooth process for launching and closing the application after execution."

"The way it identifies elements is good."

"The performance and load testing are very good."

"The most valuable aspects of the solution are the font, size, and interface."

"Before using Telerik Test Studio, I was a manual tester, so it was my first automation tool, yet I felt very comfortable using it. I've used the record and play feature, and Telerik Test Studio was easy to use. The tool was easy to understand, even for a first-time user like me."

"The document understanding is good."

"Its automated execution when a different package changes and using different test cases defined in an Excel file are particularly useful."

"It facilitates the delegation of control to multiple users and offers an efficient way to organize tasks using labels."

"We are finding bugs and defects much faster."

"UiPath's tools are generally designed for business users, so they can be as simple or as complex as needed."

"We could use it for Oracle and SAP and it did help significantly."

"Our team used to require five to six days to complete the entire release or execution cycle. Now, we're able to complete it within just one or one and a half days."

"We also don't develop test robots like typing codes; we program them with drag-and-drop features."

More UiPath Test Suite pros

Cons

"Its UI is not very user-friendly and could be improved. For new users, it isn't easy."

"There are some compatibility issues with the load standpoint test."

"It can be improved by including a feature that allows multiple file types to be selected simultaneously."

"The charts need to be more detailed and customizable."

"I observed that the Excel and Word validation was quite challenging, which is an area for improvement in the tool. I also experienced minor difficulties with Telerik Test Studio, particularly in fetching elements in some scenarios when using C# for coding."

"Orchestrator is not easy to use or understand."

"We are facing problems specifically with Desk Manager."

"We have output arguments in the workflow. We can check results only by using those arguments. It would be better to have some more options, such as screen variables. For example, in a workflow, if we want to check if an activity is present inside, we should be able to get the output to UiPath Test Suite through the activity itself. That would be great for testing."

"It would be very beneficial to do load testing with Test Suite."

"We'd like to see the solution integrate with more code or local frameworks."

"There is room for improvement in terms of introducing framework compatibility."

"Our primary application is built on Windows, so we've faced no significant challenges. However, I think mobile automation is one area where the solution still needs some work."

"The reporting could be improved. Often, we need to email a report to higher management, we can directly get the report from there. Also, the error reporting could be better."

More UiPath Test Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The pricing is fair so I rate it an eight out of ten."

"I am not aware of the exact cost. It seems reasonable, but it is an additional cost."

"Its price is a bit high."

"Regarding the pricing model, I believe it would be beneficial to combine it with some of the other platform aspects."

"It represents good value for the investment."

"I wasn't involved in the negotiations for the UiPath Test Suite, so I have no information on its pricing."

"UiPath Test Suite is a cost-effective solution. Orchestrator is the most expensive UiPath module, costing around $20,000, but you don't need to purchase Orchestrator to use Test Suite. You can buy a nonproductive version that costs about $2,400. It's a better value than other products I've seen."

"It is a little bit more expensive than Selenium, but it provides value for money. There are multiple types of licenses such as the Test Suite license, Studio Pro license, Test Manager license, and Test Robot license. The overall cost estimation is 13,800 dollars."

"One robot license costs 1,500 euros."

More UiPath Test Suite pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Test Automation Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

20%

Manufacturing Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

13%

Government

10%

Computer Software Company

18%

Financial Services Firm

11%

Manufacturing Company

11%

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

What do you like most about UiPath Test Suite?

Being able to use regular expressions, activities, and attributes is valuable.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for UiPath Test Suite?

UiPath Test Suite is costly; the licenses are expensive.

See all answers

What needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite?

There's only one thing that needs improvement with UiPath Test Suite which is the Object repository that should be considered as file instead of dependency. In that way, if any object during regres...

See all answers

Comparisons

Selenium HQ vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 35% of the time

Katalon Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 17% of the time

Tricentis Tosca vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 16% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 12% of the time

Ranorex Studio vs Telerik Test Studio

Compared 10% of the time

More Telerik Test Studio Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 42% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 21% of the time

Eggplant Test vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 9% of the time

SmartBear TestComplete vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 8% of the time

Worksoft Certify vs UiPath Test Suite

Compared 6% of the time

More UiPath Test Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Functional Testing Tools

February 2025

Download Telerik Test Studio product report

Buyer's Guide

UiPath Test Suite

February 2025

Download UiPath Test Suite product report

Overview

Telerik Test Studio is an innovative and easy-to-use automated web, WPF and load testing solution. Test Studio tests support essential technologies like ASP.NET AJAX, Silverlight, PHP and MVC. Test Studio functional testing is a comprehensive yet cost-effective automated testing suite. Users can complete tasks quickly and easily with the product's point-and-click interface, which is augmented by Telerik-exclusive features like a visual storyboard and 3D element selection. Test Studio also offers script-less test automation for Silverlight applications. Test Studio load tests allow users to capture quickly capture, multiply and replay complex web traffic. Record HTTP traffic from desktop browsers, mobile devices and web services, and replay traffic with hundreds or thousands of virtual users spread across multiple machines. Fine-tune your load scenario with data binding, user authentication, and dynamic targets. Test Studio Mobile is an intuitive and easy to use test automation solution for Mobile application testing. Create tests once and test across multiple devices and OS's. The point and click functionality allows users to capture quickly and replay complex mobile testing functionality. There is no need to write a single line of code. Test against any number of real devices as you wish or through an emulator by connecting through Wifi. Test Studio for APIs helps customers verify the integrity and reliability of their APIs in an easy way and incorporate their API testing effort in their continuous testing and delivery process. Test Studio for APIs is used to determine whether APIs return the correct response for a broad range of commonly accepted requests, react properly to edge cases such as failures and unexpected inputs, as well as deliver the responses in an acceptable amount of time.

Progress Software

Transform automated testing for your software, automations, and QA teams with Test Suite: the resilient testing solution powered by the UiPath Business Automation Platform. Leverage production-grade, low-code automation and AI power tools to automate testing for any technology while still managing testing your way.

UiPath

Sample Customers

Fox, Chicco, BNP Paribas, eBay, Coca Cola, AT&T

Information Not Available

Buyer's Guide

Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

January 2025

Free Report: Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

838,713 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Telerik Test Studio vs. UiPath Test Suite report.

See our list of best Test Automation Tools vendors and best Regression Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Test Automation Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.