OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs pCloudy comparison

OpenText and pCloudy are both solutions in the Mobile App Testing Tools category. OpenText is ranked #5 with an average rating of 8.3, while pCloudy is ranked #7 with an average rating of 9.0. OpenText holds a 2.5% mindshare in MTT, compared to pCloudy’s 0.6% mindshare. Additionally, 82% of OpenText users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of pCloudy users who would recommend it.

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Read 17 OpenText UFT Digital Lab reviews

502 Views
286 Comparison Views

82% willing to recommend

pCloudy

Read 2 pCloudy reviews

290 Views
83 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

pCloudy

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Mar 4, 2025

OpenText UFT Digital Lab and pCloudy are competing products in the testing automation sector. OpenText UFT Digital Lab has the upper hand in integration capabilities while pCloudy provides superior performance in real-device testing.

Features: OpenText UFT Digital Lab offers strong integration with various development tools, AI-driven testing, and a robust cloud-based analytics platform. pCloudy provides extensive real-device testing, AI-driven capabilities for both manual and automated testing, and efficient test execution.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Digital Lab offers scalable cloud deployment with comprehensive support tailored for large organizations. pCloudy is noted for its intuitive setup process and quick deployment, emphasizing straightforward initiation and configuration.

Pricing and ROI: OpenText UFT Digital Lab involves higher initial costs, delivering significant ROI for large enterprises through its extensive capabilities. pCloudy is more affordable, prioritizing real-device testing and offering efficiency that attracts businesses seeking high ROI with smaller budgets.

To learn more, read our detailed OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy Report (Updated: March 2025).

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy

March 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,849 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

5th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

6.9

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (18th)

pCloudy

Ranking in Mobile App Testing Tools

7th

Average Rating

8.6

Reviews Sentiment

8.3

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Mobile App Testing Tools category, the mindshare of OpenText UFT Digital Lab is 2.5%, down from 3.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of pCloudy is 0.6%, down from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Mobile App Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Robinson Caiado

Sales Leader at a computer software company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Automates mobile solutions while boosting productivity and fostering innovation

It allows multiple devices to be used and gives flexibility in adding devices when a project is needed. Most of the time, I have several devices where it is predefined. We can use it, but sometimes, we must scale it in a particular situation. It's very flexible. It is very important because we can use a different approach to software testing, for example, to find a way to execute UFT software testing with only one execution. This reproduces all the platforms that we need.

Read full review

Rabindra Kumar Maharana

Business Consultant at Laminaar Aviation

Very good on the UI level and reasonably priced

We are customers of pCloudy. We only use cloud devices and pCloudy is cheaper compared to Amazon and other tools. The product is also very good on the UI level where they can see the logs. They can discover any problem at the app level, so that the development team can fix that. The connectivity…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The product is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature of this solution is virtualization."

"The fact that it allows users to test on real mobile devices instead of emulators is something that projects have told us is beyond compare."

"There are numerous valuable features such as automation, the ones that facilitate importing and synchronization capabilities between our platform, Jira, and Azure DevOps."

"For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily."

"The solution is easy to use. There are features to orchestrate mobile testing, including mobile testing automation. You can test different devices at the same time."

"It is a complete solution for mobile application testing."

"The product is very good on the UI level."

"The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs."

Cons

"The product's object detection method needs to be improved since it can help testers do perfect testing."

"For the most part, the key challenge is ensuring that customers fully utilize the product as intended and adopt the appropriate frameworks to implement the solutions effectively."

"We need to scale devices easily. Some customers would like to loop in AWS or other cloud providers to check if their devices have the cloud factor. OpenText UFT Digital Lab needs to improve it."

"We like to host the tools centrally. We would need them to be multi-tenants, so different projects could log on and have their own set of devices and their own set of apps, and they wouldn't see data from other projects that are using it."

"I would like to see more integration with automation tools."

"The documentation and user interface both need improvement."

"They should introduce a pay-per-use subscription model."

"The connectivity is always a challenge for us."

"The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a UI level. I want a pop-up that asks users to refresh the page or check their internet connection. The product's reports also need to be optimized and refined to be presented in a better way. The tool needs to add a search option that will help users filter and extract the information that they need."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"While the pricing may seem relatively high, when compared to competitors, it often falls in line or can even be more cost-effective."

"OpenText UFT Digital Lab's pricing is average, and I rate it a five out of ten."

"The product could be more affordable."

"I would rate the tool's pricing a six-point five out of ten. It is neither too low nor high. The product has different packages like gold, silver, and platinum. The number of users is determined on the basis of the package. My company has subscribed for the product's annual plan."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Mobile App Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

22%

Computer Software Company

21%

Non Profit

Manufacturing Company

No data available

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

For automation testing, the tool provides the record and playback option, which helps with object detection easily.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

Sometimes, it's challenging to have relations with OpenText support.

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Micro Focus UFT Mobile?

We use it in financial services companies to automate mobile solutions and applications.

See all answers

What do you like most about pCloudy?

The product is user-friendly. We can see the logs when we find the bugs.

See all answers

What needs improvement with pCloudy?

The tool has connectivity issues. I had raised the issue with the support team who had asked me to check my internet connection and refresh the browser. I want that communication to be present at a...

See all answers

What is your primary use case for pCloudy?

My company's ground crew and cabin crew use an application. The solution helps the application to be compatible with other devices.

See all answers

Comparisons

Perfecto vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 27% of the time

Sauce Labs vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 21% of the time

BrowserStack vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 20% of the time

Appium vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 16% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs OpenText UFT Digital Lab

Compared 15% of the time

More OpenText UFT Digital Lab Competitors

No data available

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab

March 2025

Download OpenText UFT Digital Lab product report

Buyer's Guide

Mobile App Testing Tools

March 2025

Download pCloudy product report

Also Known As

Micro Focus UFT Digital Lab, Micro Focus UFT Mobile, Mobile Center, Micro Focus Mobile Center, HPE Mobile Center

No data available

Overview

Our enterprise-level solution is a complete, centralized lab of real mobile devices and emulators. With remote access, developers and testers can develop, debug, test, monitor, and optimize mobile apps from anywhere.

OpenText

pCloudy is the next-gen mobile app testing platform powered by emerging technologies like Artificial Intelligence and Predictive Analytics. You can perform manual as well as automation testing on more than 5000 device-browser combination hosted on cloud. It provides hosts of other services like bot testing, in-field user experience testing.

pCloudy

Sample Customers

Bci, BPER Services, Die Mobiliar, Harvard Pilgrim Healthcare, HPE, Independent Health, Shanghai OnStar Telematics, Pick n Pay, UCB

Philips, Capgemini, Honeywell, Jio, Northwell Health, Swiggy

Buyer's Guide

OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy

March 2025

Free Report: OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy

Find out what your peers are saying about OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy and other solutions. Updated: March 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,849 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our OpenText UFT Digital Lab vs. pCloudy report.

See our list of best Mobile App Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Mobile App Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.