Selenium HQ and OpenText UFT Digital Lab are competing products in the field of software testing automation. OpenText UFT Digital Lab appears to have the upper hand due to its robust suite of features and better deployment support.
Features: Selenium HQ includes key features such as cross-browser automation, extensive community-driven plugins, and support for multiple programming languages. OpenText UFT Digital Lab provides comprehensive testing capabilities across multiple devices and platforms, offers AI-driven insights for enhanced automation, and includes robust integration with HPE tools.
Room for Improvement: Selenium HQ could improve by offering dedicated customer support, streamlining deployment, and expanding its feature suite. OpenText UFT Digital Lab could benefit from lowering its price point, improving user interface customization, and enhancing community user support.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: OpenText UFT Digital Lab provides a structured deployment model with dedicated customer support, ensuring a smoother implementation process. Selenium HQ, being open source, requires more effort from technical teams for setup and lacks dedicated support, impacting deployment speed and reliability.
Pricing and ROI: Selenium HQ offers a low-cost, open-source solution making it highly cost-effective upfront. OpenText UFT Digital Lab, while initially more expensive, provides greater value through its advanced features and long-term benefits, yielding a higher ROI for businesses that leverage its full capabilities.
Selenium HQ is an umbrella project that includes a number of tools and frameworks that allow for web browser automation. In particular, Selenium offers a framework for the W3C WebDriver specification, a platform- and language-neutral coding interface that works with all of the main web browsers.
Selenium is a toolset for automating web browsers that uses the best methods available to remotely control browser instances and simulate a user's interaction with the browser. It enables users to mimic typical end-user actions, such as typing text into forms, choosing options from drop-down menus, checking boxes, and clicking links in documents. Additionally, it offers a wide range of other controls, including mouse movement, arbitrary JavaScript execution, and much more.
Although Selenium HQ is generally used for front-end website testing, it is also a browser user agent library. The interfaces are universal in their use, which enables composition with other libraries to serve your purpose.
The source code for Selenium is accessible under the Apache 2.0 license. The project is made possible by volunteers who have kindly committed hundreds of hours to the development and maintenance of the code.
Selenium HQ Tools
These three main Selenium HQ tools have powerful capabilities:
Reviews from Real Users
Selenium HQ stands out among its competitors for a number of reasons. Two major ones are its driver interface and its speed. PeerSpot users take note of the advantages of these features in their reviews:
Avijit B., an automation tester at a tech services company, writes of the solution, “The driver interface is really useful. When we implement the Selenium driver interface, we can easily navigate through all of the pages and sections of an app, including performing things like clicking, putting through SendKeys, scrolling down, tagging, and all the other actions we need to test for in an application.”
Another PeerSpot reviewer, a software engineer at a financial services firm, notes, “Selenium is the fastest tool compared to other competitors. It can run on any language, like Java, Python, C++, and .NET. So we can test any application on Selenium, whether it's mobile or desktop."
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.